Mechanical properties of roots combined with prefabricated fiber post
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examined the mechanical properties of roots combined with prefabricated fiber post. Three types of specimens were evaluated: (1) prefabricated fiber post alone (FP); (2) core composite resin with FP (CFP); and (3) root with CFP (RCFP). The volume fractions of the prefabricated fiber post in the core composite resin (FP/CFP ratio) were set to 0, 0.16, 0.22, 0.28, and 0.48. Bending test for FP and CFP, and diametral compression test for FP, CFP, and RCFP were carried out. The FP/CFP ratio showed no effect on the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of RCFP; and there were no significant differences in DTS with/without FP. The flexural strength of CFP increased with increase in FP/CFP ratio. The DTS of CFP declined in comparison with that of core composite resin only.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Plant Disease Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12322710.1067/mpr.2002.123227 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.01210.1016/j.dental.2004.02.012 ↗
3. 3) Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 60-68.
4. 4) Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 2007; 35: 496-502.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.009 ↗
5. 5) Qualtrough AJ, Manocci F. Tooth-colored post system: a review. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 86-91.
6. 6) Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Ronnlof AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 250-256.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00357.x ↗
7. 7) Kalkan M, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 41-46.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005 ↗
8. 8) D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 193-198.10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9 ↗
9. 9) Perdigao J, Monteiro P, Gomes G, Santos V. Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19: 359-365.
10. 10.2341/04-16910.2341/04-169 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.01810.1016/j.dental.2006.01.018 ↗
12. 10.1097/00004770-200112000-0001110.1097/00004770-200112000-00011 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-410.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4 ↗
14. 14) Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1129-1135.10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.047 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70276-310.1016/S0022-3913(99)70276-3 ↗
16. 16) Viguie G, Malquarti G, Vincent B, Bourgeois D. Epoxy/ carbon composite resins in dentistry: mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 245-249.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90336-0 ↗
17. NAGASE DENIS YUDI · 2005 · 24 · 28010.4012/dmj.24.280 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90028-110.1016/S0022-3913(96)90028-1 ↗
19. 19) Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Nakahara H. Potential for load-induced cervical stress concentration as a function of periodontal support. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 215-222.10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00401.x ↗
20. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12837610.1067/mpr.2002.128376 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70005-310.1016/S0022-3913(99)70005-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-010.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 ↗
23. 23) Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Buchler A. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 86-91.10.1053/jopr.2002.124545 ↗
24. 24) Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SM. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 272-276.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70079-X ↗
25. 25) Shaini FJ, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 142-148.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00054-3 ↗
26. 26) Fonseca RG, Santos JG, Adabo GL. Influence of activation modes on diametral tensile strength of dual-curing resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2005; 19: 267-271.10.1590/S1806-83242005000400006 ↗
27. 27) American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. American National Standards Institution/American Dental Association Specification No. 27 for direct filling resins. J Amer Dent Ass 1977; 94: 191-19410.14219/jada.archive.1977.0360 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0102039710.1007/BF01020397 ↗
29. 29) Alander P, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The span length and cross-sectional design affect values of strength. Dent Mater 2005: 21: 347-353.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.009 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.00310.1016/j.dental.2003.12.003 ↗
31. 31) Coelho Santos G Jr, El-Mowafy O, Hernique Rubo J. Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 335-341.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.017 ↗
32. 32) Grobler DG, Driessen CH, Odendaal J. Bond integrity of dental core materials to esthetic intraradicular posts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 605-613.