Influence of the bracket on bonding and physical behavior of orthodontic resin cements
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine the influence of the type of bracket, on bond strength, microhardness and conversion degree (CD) of four resin orthodontic cements. Micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) test between the bracket base and the cement was carried out on glass-hour-shaped specimens (n=20). Vickers Hardness Number (VHN) and micro-Raman spectra were recorded in situ under the bracket base. Weibull distribution, ANOVA and non-parametric test were applied for data analysis (p<0.05). The highest values of ή as well as the β Weibull parameter were obtained for metallic brackets with Transbond™ plastic brackets with the self-curing cement showing the worst performance. The CD was from 80% to 62.5%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Stomatology, Campus de Cartuja, University of Granada
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Campus de Fuentenueva, University of Granada
Department of Stomatology, University Rey Juan Carlos, Campus of Alcorcón
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 65-70.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.003 ↗
2. 2) Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 490-494.10.1093/ejo/cjn029 ↗
3. 3) Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Yi, Dijkstra PU. Invitro orthodontic bond strength testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 615-622.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021 ↗
4. 4) Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 83-94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.023 ↗
5. 5) Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives —a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1-14.10.1007/s00784-011-0626-8 ↗
6. 6) Banks P, Elton V, Jones Y, Rice P, Derwent S, Odondi L. The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists. J Orthod 2010; 37:43-55.10.1179/14653121042867 ↗
7. 7) Ali O, Makou M, Papadopoulos T, Eliades G. Laboratory evaluation of modern plastic brackets. Eur Orthod 2012; 34: 595-602.10.1093/ejo/cjr063 ↗
8. 8) Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 610-617.10.1093/ejo/cjr044 ↗
9. 9) Theodorakopoulou LP, Sadowsky L, Jacobson A, Lacefield W.Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 329-336.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.015 ↗
10. 10) Sostena MMDS, Nogueira RA, Grandini CR, Moraes JCS. Glass transition and degree of conversion of a light-cured orthodontic composite. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 570-573.10.1590/S1678-77572009000600006 ↗
11. 11) Porto IC, Aguiar FH, Cunha WC, Liporon PC. Mechanical and physical properties of silorane and methacrylate-based composites. J Dent 2013; 41: 732-739.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.012 ↗
12. 12) Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Polymerization efficiency of chemically and visible lightcured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108: 294-301.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70024-2 ↗
13. 13) Gioka C , Bourauel C , Hiskia A , Kletsas D, Eliades T, Eliades G.Light-cured or chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins? A selection based on the degree of cure, monomer leaching, and cytotoxicity . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 413-419.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.015 ↗
14. 14) Cerveira GP, Berthold TB, Souto AA, Spohr AM, Marchioro EM. Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz-tungstenhalogen light. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 83-86.10.1093/ejo/cjp048 ↗
15. 15) Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 333-340.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8 ↗
16. 16) Katona TR. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 244-251.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70251-8 ↗
17. 17) Algera TJ, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Kleverlaan CJ. A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 608-612.10.1093/ejo/cjq112 ↗
18. 18) Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e50-62.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155 ↗
19. 19) Salz U, Bock T. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue —A review. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 343-371.
20. 20) Shin DH, Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1030-1038.10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.004 ↗
21. 21) De Munck J, Luehrs AK, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 635-644.10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.010 ↗
22. 22) Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e78-93.10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗
23. 23) Ghassemieh E. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 536-547.10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.022 ↗
24. 24) Soares CJ, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PCF, Armstrong SR. Microtensile specimens attachment and shape —Finite elements analysis. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 89-93.10.1177/154405910808700116 ↗
25. 25) Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Muench A, Ferrari M, Cardoso PE. A novel method to obtain microtensile specimens minimizing cut flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 78: 7-14.10.1002/jbm.b.30447 ↗
26. 26) Lamper T, Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Huth KC, Ilie N, Paschos E.Does a reduction of polymerization time and bonding steps affect the bond strength of brackets? Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 665-671.10.1007/s00784-011-0540-0 ↗
27. 27) Türkkahraman H, Adanir N, Gungor AY, Alkis H. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of colour change adhesives. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 571-574.10.1093/ejo/cjp149 ↗
28. 28) Li J, Shibuya I, Teshima I, Nemoto K, Nishiyama N. Development of dual-curing type experimental composite resin cement for orthodontic bonding —Effect of additional amount of accelerators on the mechanical properties—. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 401-408.10.4012/dmj.28.401 ↗
29. 29) Algera TJ. A better understanding of orthodontic bracket bonding. Faculty of Dentistry Year 2009 Pages 127. Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA). http://dare.uva.nl/record/294720
30. 30) Pakshir HR, Zarif Najafi H, Hajipour S. Effect of enamel surface treatment on the bond strength of metallic brackets in rebonding process. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 773-777.10.1093/ejo/cjr093 ↗
31. 31) Gama AC, Moraes AG, Yamasaki LC, Loguercio AD, Carvalho CN, Bauer J. Properties of composite materials used for bracktes bonding. Braz Dent J 2013; 24: 279-283.10.1590/0103-6440201302184 ↗
32. 32) Poggio C, Lombardini M, Gaviati S, Chiesa M. Evaluation of Vickers hardness and depth of cure of six composite resins photo-activated with different polymerization modes. J Conserv Dent 2012; 15: 237-241.10.4103/0972-0707.97946 ↗
33. 33) Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 642-649.10.1067/mpr.2002.125179 ↗
34. 34) Galvão MR, Caldas SG, Bagnato VS, Rastelli AN, de Andrade MF. Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photo-activated with different light guide tips. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 86-93.
35. 35) Karabela MM, Sideridou ID. Synthesis and study of properties of dental resin composites with different nanosilica particles size. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 825-835.10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.008 ↗
36. 36) Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 251-258.10.1016/0889-5406(91)70062-2 ↗
37. 37) da Silva EM, Poskus LT, Guimarães JG. Influence of lightpolymerization modes on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites: A comparative analysis between a hybrid and a nanofilled composite. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 287-293.10.2341/07-81 ↗
38. 38) Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Hotta Y, Hotta M, Idono T, Yamamoto K.Examination of composite resins with electron microscopy, tester and energy dispersive X-ray microanalyzer. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 102-112.10.4012/dmj.28.102 ↗
39. 39) Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 227-235.10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8 ↗
40. 40) Hass V, Dobrovolski M, Zander-GrandeC, Martins CG, Gordillo LA, Accorinte MLR, Gomes OM, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-andrinseadhesives. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 921-928.10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.001 ↗
41. 41) Jagdish N, Padmanabhan S, Chitharanjan AB, Revathi J, Palani G, Sambasivam M, Sheriff K, Saravanamurali K. Cytotoxicity and degree of conversion of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 1133-1138.10.2319/080808-418R.1 ↗
42. 42) Moraes RR, Boscato N, Jardim PS. Dual and self-curing potential of self-adhesive resin cements as thin films. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 635-642.10.2341/10-367-L ↗
43. 43) Oliveira M, Cesar PF, Giannini M, Rueggeberg A, Rodrigues J, Arrais CA. Effect of temperature on the degree of conversion and working time of dual-cured resin cements exposed to different curing conditions. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 370-379.10.2341/11-198-L ↗
44. 44) Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1411-1418.10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.009 ↗
45. 45) Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 121-131.10.1002/jbm.820200111 ↗
46. 46) Schneider LF, Pfeifer CS, Consania S, Prahlc SA, Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1169-1177.10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.007 ↗
47. 47) Sunitha C, KailasamV, Padmanabhan S, Chitharanjanc AB. Bisphenol A release from an orthodontic adhesive and its correlation with the degree of conversion on varying lightcuring tip distances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 239-244.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.037 ↗
48. 48) Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications:Part 2. Current status and projected future developments in materials and biocompatibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 253-262.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.029 ↗
49. 49) Pick B, Gonzaga CC, Junior WS, Kawano Y, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Influence of curing light attenuation caused by aesthetic indirect restorative materials on resin cement polymerization. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 314-323.10.1055/s-0039-1697845 ↗
50. 50) Yan YL, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Changes in degree of conversion and microhardness of dental resin cements. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 203-210.10.2341/09-174-L ↗
51. 51) Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1819-1829.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00308-8 ↗