journal article·2020-03-27Open access

Selective laser melted titanium implants play a positive role in early osseointegration in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats

Yansheng DUAN, Xiangdong LIU, Sijia ZHANG, Lei WANG, Feng DING, Shuang SONG, Xutao CHEN, Banglian DENG, Yingliang SONG

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 39· Issue 2

Abstract

Success of dental implant is associated with the surface modification. To evaluate whether the selective laser melting-superfinished titanium (Ti6Al4V) implants have a better early osseointegration in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats compare to pure titanium implants and acid-etched treated (SLA) implants, we designed a screw-shaped implant which was batch-fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM). Then the implants were randomly inserted in tibias of rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). After surgical operation, the SLM group showed the best bone formation around the implants with the highest bone-implant contact rate among the three groups.Removal torque tests and histomorphological analyses all revealed a stronger connection between the bone because its good surface characteristics and mechanical properties. SLM implant may be a novel implant for T2DM patients.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University

Stomatological Hospital of Peking University

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 Suppl 3: 97-113.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x ↗
2. 2) Ramakrishnaiah R, Al KA, Mohammad A, Divakar DD, Kotha SB, Celur SL, et al. Preliminary fabrication and characterization of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V customized dental implant. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017; 24: 787-796.10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.05.001 ↗
3. 3) Ozan S, Lin J, Li Y, Wen C. New Ti-Ta-Zr-Nb alloys with ultrahigh strength for potential orthopedic implant applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 75: 119-127.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.011 ↗
4. 4) Yu M, Zhou W, Song Y, Yu F, Li D, Na S, et al. Development of mesenchymal stem cell-implant complexes by cultured cells sheet enhances osseointegration in type 2 diabetic rat model. Bone 2011; 49: 387-394.10.1016/j.bone.2011.05.025 ↗
5. 5) Liang L, Song Y, Li L, Li D, Qin M, Zhao J, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells combined with inorganic bovine bone in calvarial bone healing in rats with type 2 diabetes. J Periodontol 2014; 85: 601-609.10.1902/jop.2013.120652 ↗
6. 6) Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844-854.10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 ↗
7. 7) Yamawaki I, Taguchi Y, Komasa S, Tanaka A, Umeda M. Effects of glucose concentration on osteogenic differentiation of type II diabetes mellitus rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on a nano-scale modified titanium. J Periodontal Res 2017; 52: 761-771.10.1111/jre.12446 ↗
8. 8) Pourmollaabbassi B, Karbasi S, Hashemibeni B. Evaluate the growth and adhesion of osteoblast cells on nanocomposite scaffold of hydroxyapatite/titania coated with poly hydroxybutyrate. Adv Biomed Res 2016; 5: 156.10.4103/2277-9175.188486 ↗
9. 9) Ren MM, Liu LP, Liu ZH. Eight-year clinical results of SLA surface implant for dentition defect. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2017; 26: 447-452.
10. 10) Shaoki A, Xu JY, Sun H, Chen XS, Ouyang J, Zhuang XM, et al. Osseointegration of three-dimensional designed titanium implants manufactured by selective laser melting. Biofabrication 2016; 8: 45014.10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045014 ↗
11. 11) Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN. Additive technology: Update on current materials and applications in dentistry. J Prosthodont 2017; 26: 156-163.10.1111/jopr.12510 ↗
12. 12) van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 3-12.10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 ↗
13. 13) Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 783948.10.1155/2014/783948 ↗
14. 14) Ghosh S, Abanteriba S, Wong S, Houshyar S. Selective laser melted titanium alloys for hip implant applications: Surface modification with new method of polymer grafting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 87: 312-324.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.031 ↗
15. 15) Wally ZJ, Haque AM, Feteira A, Claeyssens F, Goodall R, Reilly GC. Selective laser melting processed Ti6Al4V lattices with graded porosities for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 90: 20-29.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.047 ↗
16. 16) Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 323-334.10.1002/jbm.a.30518 ↗
17. 17) Zou GK, Song YL, Zhou W, Yu M, Liang LH, Sun DC, et al. Effects of local delivery of bFGF from PLGA microspheres on osseointegration around implants in diabetic rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 284-289.10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.006 ↗
18. 18) Wang F, Song YL, Li CX, Li DH, Zhang HP, Ma AJ, et al. Sustained release of insulin-like growth factor-1 from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres improves osseointegration of dental implants in type 2 diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2010; 640: 226-232.10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.024 ↗
19. 19) Liu JY, Chen F, Ge YJ, Wei L, Pan SX, Feng HL. Influence of implants prepared by selective laser melting on early bone healing. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018; 50: 117-122.
20. 20) Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J.Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifcations. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1429-1438.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.015 ↗
21. 21) Di Iorio D, Traini T, Degidi M, Caputi S, Neugebauer J, Piattelli A. Quantitative evaluation of the fibrin clot extension on different implant surfaces: an in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 74: 636-642.10.1002/jbm.b.30251 ↗
22. 22) Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 889-902.10.1002/jbm.820250708 ↗
23. 23) Thomas KA, Kay JF, Cook SD, Jarcho M. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 1395-1414.10.1002/jbm.820211205 ↗
24. 24) Itala AI, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 679-683.10.1002/jbm.1069 ↗
25. 25) Kang NS, Li LJ, Cho SA. Comparison of removal torques between laser-treated and SLA-treated implant surfaces in rabbit tibiae. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 302-308.10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.302 ↗
26. 26) Gaggl A, Schultes G, Muller WD, Karcher H. Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces: a comparative study. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1067-1073.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00002-8 ↗
27. 27) Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, de Wild M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res 2006; 78: 291-297.10.1002/jbm.a.30678 ↗
28. 28) Ghosh S, Abanteriba S. Status of surface modification techniques for artificial hip implants. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2016; 17: 715-735.10.1080/14686996.2016.1240575 ↗