Bond Strengths of Three Different Dentin Adhesive Systems to Sclerotic Dentin
Source abstract
Abstract
The two-fold aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths of different adhesive systems to sclerotic and sound palatal dentin; and (2) to observe the respective resin-dentin interfaces. Thirty extracted human incisor teeth were divided into two groups. Group I comprised sclerotic defects in the palatal zone. Group II comprised sound palatal dentin surfaces as control. Each group (n=15) was divided into three subgroups according to dentin adhesive systems: self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond), total-etch (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), and glass ionomer (Reactmer Bond) adhesive systems. The specimens were subjected to tensile forces. Obtained data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and post hoc Duncan's test. Fracture sites and resin-dentin interfaces were observed using a light microscope and SEM. With sound dentin, Clearfil SE Bond showed a significantly higher bond strength than the other adhesives (p < 0.05). With sclerotic dentin, although there were no significant differences in bond strength among the adhesives groups (p > 0.05), the bond strength values of Clearfil SE Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus were significantly decreased. On resin-dentin interface observation, different images were presented by different bonding systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Trauma and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Rose WF, Haveman CW, Davis DR. Fundamentals of operative dentistry, 3rd ed, Quintessence Pub Co., Illinois, 2006, pp.37-67.
2. 2) Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Case-control study of noncarious cervical lesions. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 286-291.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00861.x ↗
3. 3) Bartlett DW, Evans DF, Anggiansah A, Smith BG. A study of the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and palatal dental erosion. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 125-131.10.1038/sj.bdj.4809187 ↗
4. 4) Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res 2004; 38: 34-44.10.1159/000074360 ↗
5. 5) Imfeld T. Tooth erosion. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 236-240.
6. 6) Bishop K, Kelleher M, Briggs P, Joshi R. Wear now? An update on the etiology of tooth wear. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 305-313.
7. 7) Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 95-110.
8. 8) Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentin. J Dent 1994; 22: 141-146.10.1016/0300-5712(94)90197-X ↗
9. 9) Yoshiyama M, Suge T, Kawasaki A, Ebisu S. Morphological characterization of tube-like structures in hypersensitive human radicular dentin. J Dent 1996; 24: 57-63.10.1016/0300-5712(95)00016-X ↗
10. 10) Nicholson JW. Fundamentals of operative dentistry, 3rd ed, Quintessence Pub Co., Illinois, 2006, pp.1-36.
11. 11) Mixson JM, Spencer P, Moore DL, Chappell RP, Adams S. Surface morphology and chemical characterization of abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 5-9.
12. 10.1177/0022034596075006120110.1177/00220345960750061201 ↗
13. 13) El-din AK, Miller BH, Griggs JA. Resin bonding to sclerotic, noncarious, cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 529-540.
14. 14) Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM, Pashley DH. Bonding of a self-etching primer to noncarious cervical sclerotic dentin: Interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 9-28.
15. 15) Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004; 32: 173-196.10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009 ↗
16. 16) Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
17. 17) Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Fundamentals of operative dentistry, 3rd ed, Quintessence Pub Co., Illinois, 2006, pp.183-260.
18. 18) Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 26-36.10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0104 ↗
19. 10.1177/0022034599078002100110.1177/00220345990780021001 ↗
20. 20) Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y. Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 8-16.
21. 21) Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 359-369.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00051-3 ↗
22. 22) Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Monteiro S, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Baratieri CM. entin bonding: effect of degree of mineralization and acid etching time. per Dent 2003; 28: 429-439.
23. 23) Van Meerbeek B, Conn LJ Jr, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Guerrero D. Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of nondemineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 879-888.10.1177/00220345960750030401 ↗
24. 24) Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 185-194.
25. 25) Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 88-94.
26. 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00046-X10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00046-X ↗
27. 27) Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Montanari G, Pashley DH. Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentin layer in young, old, and sclerotic dentin. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 66-72.
28. 28) Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent Res 1996; 24: 435-442.10.1016/0300-5712(95)00102-6 ↗
29. 29) Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow Mf, Tyas MJ. Micromorphological study of resin-dentin interface of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 493-499.
30. 30) Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, Pashley DH. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 153-167.
31. 10.1177/0022034500079002030110.1177/00220345000790020301 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00204-510.1016/S0142-9612(99)00204-5 ↗
33. 33) Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, Gregoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 229-237.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00036-6 ↗
34. 34) Özer F, Sengun A, Ozturk B, Say EC, Tagami J. Effect of tooth age on microtensile bond strength of two fluoride-releasing bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 289-295.
35. 35) Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 11-15.10.2341/06-50 ↗