Viscosity and adhesion strength of cream-type denture adhesives and mouth moisturizers
Source abstract
Abstract
We evaluated adhesion strength to acrylic resins under various experimental conditions and viscosity of 4 cream-type denture adhesives and 2 mouth moisturizers. The viscosity was determined by a sine-wave vibro viscometer. The adhesion strength tests were performed with 2 resin plates at a universal tester. In Method A, various constant thicknesses of material layer were tested and tensile strength was measured, while in Method B a constant load was applied before measurement. Five tests were carried out for each measurement. With Method A, adhesion strength increased exponentially as the layer got thin. Effect of the material thicknesses (contribution ratio ρ=79.0%) was much larger than that of material type (ρ=15.3%). Materials with higher viscosity had greater levels of adhesion strength in Method A, whereas those with the higher viscosity had lower levels of adhesion strength in Method B. Adhesion strength was significantly affected by the experimental condition prior to applying tension.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices. A glossary for dental materials and devices. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Publishers Inc; 2005. p. 20.
2. 2) Takahashi H. Type and characteristics of denture adhesives. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2003; 47: 474-483.10.2186/jjps.47.474 ↗
3. 3) Ellis B, Al-Nakash S, Lamb DJ. The composition and rheology of denture adhesives. J Dent 1980; 8: 109-118.10.1016/0300-5712(80)90025-1 ↗
4. 4) Murata H, Hong G, Yamakado C, Kurogi T, Kano H, Hamada T. Dynamic viscoelastic properties, water absorption, and solubility of home reliners. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 554-561.10.4012/dmj.2010-012 ↗
5. 5) Woelfel JB, Berg T, Mann AW, Kreider JA. Documented reports of bone loss caused by use of a denture reliner. JADA 1965; 71: 23-34.10.14219/jada.archive.1965.0132 ↗
6. 6) Neill DJ, Roberts BJ. The effect of denture fixatives on masticatory performance in complete denture patients. J Dent 1973; 1: 219-222.10.1016/0300-5712(73)90064-X ↗
7. 7) Tarbet WJ, Boone M, Schmidt NF. Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 374-378.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90092-X ↗
8. 8) Chew CL, Boone ME, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Denture adhesives: their effects on denture retention and stability. J Dent 1985; 13: 152-159.10.1016/0300-5712(85)90089-2 ↗
9. 9) Ghani F, Picton DC. Some clinical investigations on retention forces of maxillary complete dentures with the use of denture fixatives. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 631-640.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01178.x ↗
10. 10) Grasso JE, Rendell J, Gay T. Effect of denture adhesive on the retention and stability of maxillary dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 399-405.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90560-6 ↗
11. 11) Pradíes G, Sanz I, Evans O, Martnez F, Sanz M. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 361- 367.
12. 12) Adisman IK. The use of denture adhesives as an aid to denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 711-715.10.1016/0022-3913(89)90598-2 ↗
13. 13) Slaughter A, Katz RV, Grasso JE. Professional attitudes toward denture adhesives: A Delphi Technique survey of academic prosthodontists. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 80-89.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70131-9 ↗
14. 14) Kakiuchi H, Imai K. In vitro cytotoxicity of denture adhesives. J J Dent Mater 1990; 9: 146-158.
15. 15) Makihira S, Nikawa H, Nishimura H, Nishimura M, Murata H, Sadamori S, Ishida K, Yamashiro H, Jin C, Egusa H, Fukushima H, Hamada T. Effects of eluates of denture adhesives on human gingival fibroblasts. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2001; 45: 403-411.10.2186/jjps.45.403 ↗
16. 16) Zhao K, Cheng XR, Chao YL, Li ZA, Han GL. Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 419-424.10.1016/j.dental.2002.12.001 ↗
17. 17) Gates WD, Goldschmidt M, Kramer D. Microbial contamination in four commercially available denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 154-158.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90024-8 ↗
18. 18) Koppang R, Berg E, Dahm S, Real C, Fløystrand F. A method for testing denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 486-491.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80080-0 ↗
19. 19) Panagiotouni E, Pissiotis A, Kapari D, Kaloyannides A. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 578-585.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80120-9 ↗
20. 20) International Organization for Standardization (2010) ISO 10873. Dentistry —Denture adhesives.
21. 21) Sipahi C, Beyzadeoglu M, Demirtas S, Ozen J. Effect of different mucosal and acrylic resin surface treatments in a denture retention model for patients with radiotherapyinduced xerostomia. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 405-408.
22. 22) Shahdad SA, Taylor C, Barclay SC, Steen IN, Preshaw PM. A double-blind, crossover study of Biotene Oralbalance and BioXtra systems as salivary substitutes in patients with postradiotherapy xerostomia. Eur J Cancer Care 2005; 14: 319-326.10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00587.x ↗
23. 23) Tenovuo J. Clinical application of antimicrobial host proteins lactoperoxidase, lysozyme and lactoferrin in xerostomia: efficacy and safety. Oral Dis 2002; 8: 23-29.10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o781.x ↗
24. 24) Kroschwitz JI (Mita I). Concise encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering. Tokyo: Maruzen Co; 1994. p. 566-569.
25. 25) Iida Y. Physical factors in denture retention. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1975; 22: 113-125.
26. 26) Hosoi T. In: Relining and repair for restoring denture. Tokyo: Ishiyaku publishers, Inc. 1997: p. 18-19.
27. 27) Fujimori T, Nakano F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Nishimura F, Hayakawa I. Effects of adherend on retentive force using denture adhesives and home-reliners. J J Dent Mater 2002; 21: 368-375.
28. 28) Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Hayakawa I. The evaluation of denture retention and ease of removal from oral mucosa on a new geltype denture adhesive. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2008; 52: 175- 182.10.2186/jjps.52.175 ↗
29. 29) Ohguri T, Kawano F, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Influence of occlusal scheme on the pressure distribution under a complete denture. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 353-358.
30. 30) Al RH, Dahl JE, Morisbak E, Polyzois GL. Irritation and cytotoxic potential of denture adhesives. Gerodontology 2005; 22: 177-183.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2005.00073.x ↗