A stability evaluation of a novel titanium dental implant/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite complex under functional loading conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of implant/interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite complex (implant/IPCHA-complex) under functional loading. Implant/IP-CHA-complexes were placed into the mandibles of four Beagle-Labrador hybrid dogs (complex-group). On the other side, an implant was placed directly (control-group). To subject the loading, the animals were fed a hard diet throughout the loading phase of 5 months. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) and bone implant contact (BIC), and histological evaluations were performed. The ISQs of implant/IP-CHA-complex was significantly lower at placement than that of the control-implant. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between in the groups during loading. The BIC measurements, there was no significantly difference between in both groups. Histologically, newly formed bone was observed in contact with most of the implant surface in the complex-group. An IP-CHA/implant-complex would be able to achieve both bone reconstruction and implant stability under functional loading conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Brånemark P, Zarb G, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Chicago: Quitessence Publishing 1985; 11-43.
2. 2) Verdugo F, Simonian K, Frydman A, D’Addona A, Pontón J. Long-term block graft stability in thin periodontal biotype patients: a clinical and tomographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 325-332.
3. 3) Triplett RG, Schow SR. Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 486-494.10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90126-3 ↗
4. 4) Lundgren S, Nyström E, Nilson H, Gunne J, Lindhagen O. Bone grafting to the maxillary sinuses, nasal floor and anterior maxilla in the atrophic edentulous maxilla. A two-stage technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 428-434.10.1016/S0901-5027(97)80007-0 ↗
5. 5) Von Arx T, Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Lateral ridge augmentation and implant placement: an experimental study evaluating implant osseointegration in different augmentation materials in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 343-354.
6. 6) Faria PE, Carvalho AL, de Torres EM, Rasmusson L, Salata LA. Effects of early functional loading on maintenance of free autogenous bone graft and implant osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 825-832.10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.077 ↗
7. 7) De Santis E, Lang NP, Cesaretti G, Mainetti T, Beolchini M, Botticelli D. Healing outcomes at implants installed in sites augmented with particulate autologous bone and xenografts. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 340-350.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02326.x ↗
8. 8) Reuben SS, Vieira P, Faruqi S, Verghis A, Kilaru PA, Maciolek H.Local administration of morphine for analgesia after iliac bone graft harvest. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 390-394.10.1097/00000542-200108000-00021 ↗
9. 9) Tamai N, Myoui A, Tomita T, Nakase T, Tanaka J, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H. Novel hydroxyapatite ceramics with an interconnective porous structure exhibit superior osteoconduction in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 59: 110-117.10.1002/jbm.1222 ↗
10. 10) Kubo T, Doi K, Hayashi K, Morita K, Matsuura A, Teixeira ER, Akagawa Y. Comparative evaluation of bone regeneration using spherical and irregularly shaped granules of interconnected porous hydroxylapatite. A beagle dog study. J Prosthodont Res 2011; 55: 104-109.10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.001 ↗
11. 11) Shigeishi H, Takechi M, Nishimura M, Takamoto M, Minami M, Ohta K, Kamata N. Clinical evaluation of novel interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics (IP-CHA) in a maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 54-60.10.4012/dmj.2011-089 ↗
12. 12) Doi K, Kubo T, Takeshita R, Kajihara S, Kato S, Kawazoe Y, Shiba T, Akagawa Y. Inorganic polyphosphate adsorbed onto hydroxyapatite for guided bone regeneration: an animal study. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 179-186.10.4012/dmj.2013-275 ↗
13. 13) Doi K, Oue H, Morita K, Kajihara S, Kubo T, Koretake K, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Akagawa Y. Development of implant/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite complex as new concept graft material. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e49051.10.1371/journal.pone.0049051 ↗
14. 14) Doi K, Kajihara S, Morita K, Makihara Y, Okada S, Akagawa Y. Comparative study on the influence of formalin fixation for the measurement of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis and Periotest: An animal study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52: 29-33.10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.02.007 ↗
15. 15) Steinkamp JA, Hansen KM, Crissman HA. Flow microfluorometric and light-scatter measurement of nuclear and cytoplasmic size in mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 1976; 24: 292-297.10.1177/24.1.1254924 ↗
16. 16) Anderson HC. Molecular biology of matrix vesicles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 314: 266-280.10.1097/00003086-199505000-00034 ↗
17. 17) Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261-267.10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x ↗
18. 18) Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 266-272.10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8 ↗
19. 19) Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Rée A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hämmerle CH. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 428-434.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x ↗
20. 20) Hui E, Chow J, Li D, Liu J, Wat P, Law H. Immediate provisional for single-tooth implant replacement with Brånemark system: preliminary report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 79-86.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00235.x ↗
21. 21) Tawse-Smith A, Perio C, Payne AG, Kumara R, Thomson WM. One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 185-193.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x ↗
22. 22) Al-Nawas B, Wagner W, Grötz KA. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant system in an animal model with loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 21: 726-732.
23. 23) Vandamme K, Naert I, Geris L, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Duyck J. The effect of micro-motion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115: 21-29.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00416.x ↗
24. 24) Blanco J, Alvarez E, Muñoz F, Liñares A, Cantalapiedra A. Influence on early osseointegration of dental implants installed with two different drilling protocols: a histomorphometric study in rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 21: 92-99.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02009.x ↗
25. 25) Huang HM, Pan LC, Lee SY, Chiu CL, Fan KH, Ho KN. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 285-291.10.1067/moe.2000.108918 ↗