Wear model simulating clinical abrasion on composite filling materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish a wear model for testing composite filling materials with abrasion properties closer to a clinical situation. In addition, the model was used to evaluate the effect of filler volume and particle size on surface roughness and wear resistance. Each incisor tooth was prepared with nine identical standardized cavities with respect to depth, diameter, and angle. Generic composite of 3 different filler volumes and 3 different particle sizes held together with the same resin were randomly filled in respective cavities. A multidirectional wet-grinder with molar cusps as antagonist wore the surface of the incisors containing the composite fillings in a bath of human saliva at a constant temperature of 37°C. The present study suggests that the most wear resistant filling materials should consist of medium filling content (75%) and that particles size is not as critical as earlier reported.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department for Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Espelid I, Cairns J, Askildsen JE, Qvist V, Gaarden T, Tveit AB. Preferences over dental restorative materials among young patients and dental professionals. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 15-21.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00282.x ↗
2. 2) Van Noort R, Gjerdet NR, Schedle A, Bjorkman L, Berglund A. An overview of the current status of national reporting systems for adverse reactions to dental materials. J Dent 2004; 32: 351-358.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.001 ↗
3. 3) Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners. Community Dent Health 2002; 19: 98-103.
4. 4) Gelband H. The science and politics of dental amalgam. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14: 123-134.10.1017/S0266462300010576 ↗
5. 5) Bengtsson U. [Copper amalgam as recommended by the National Board of Health and Welfare]. Lakartidningen 1995; 92: 1581-1582.
6. 6) Burke FJ. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials — implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent 2004; 32: 343-350.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.003 ↗
7. 7) Rugg-Gunn AJ, Welbury RR, Toumba J. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on the use of amalgam in paediatric dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 233-238.10.1046/j.1365-263X.2001.011003233.x ↗
8. 8) DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: Rethinking the current approaches: How to measure wear. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 702-711.10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.003 ↗
9. 9) Bowen RL, inventor Dental filling mateial comprising vinylsilane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bis phenol and glycidyalcrylate. USA patent 3066112. 1962.
10. 10) Jack LF. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern?: Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 2006; 22: 689-692.10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005 ↗
11. 11) Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 712-734.10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002 ↗
12. 12) Dijken JWVV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28(5): 299-306.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00010-5 ↗
13. 13) Turssi CP, Purquerio B, Serra MS. Wear of dental resin composites: Insights into underlying processes and assessment methods —A review. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 65B: 5.10.1002/jbm.b.10563 ↗
14. 14) Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 693-701.10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004 ↗
15. 15) Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 410-416.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70004-6 ↗
16. 16) Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. P-30: in vivo study of a posterior composite during 2.5 years. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitung 1990; 45: 773-778.
17. 17) Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1999 : 60-66.
18. 18) De Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 1994; 22 Suppl 1: S21-27.10.1016/0300-5712(94)90167-8 ↗
19. 19) Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent 1999; 27: 479-485.10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00027-5 ↗
20. 20) Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa HP, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: Conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1472-1477.10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0060 ↗
21. 21) Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators —results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 304-317.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.003 ↗
22. 22) Lu H, Lee YK, Oguri M, Powers JM. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 734-740.10.2341/05-154 ↗
23. 23) Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 269-274.
24. 24) Yap AU. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 194-200.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00814.x ↗
25. 25) Freiberg RS, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 214-218.
26. 26) Xu HC, Wang T, Heindl D, Zheng G, Liu WY, Nagel JR. A study of retentive filler and its use in dentistry. Chin J Dent Res 1998; 1: 7-12.
27. 27) Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 173-178.
28. 28) Krejci I, Lutz F, Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1413-1416.10.1177/00220345920710071001 ↗
29. 29) Buehler. Buehler is the Science behind Materials Preparation and Analysis. 2008; Available from: http://www.buehler. com/.
30. 30) Bruice PY. Organic chemistry. In: Challice J, editor. Organic chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001. p. 495-519.
31. 31) William MP, Garry JPF, Burke FJT, Peter MM, Ros CR. Monomer conversion versus flexure strength of a novel dental composite. J Dent 2003; 31: 341-351.10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00050-2 ↗
32. 32) Ferracane JL, Greener EH. Fourier transform infrared analysis of degree of polymerization in unfilled resins — methods comparison. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1093-1095.10.1177/00220345840630081901 ↗
33. 33) Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932-4937.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.026 ↗
34. 34) Heigl JJ, Bell MF, White JU. Application of infrared spectroscopy to the analysis of liquid hydrocarbons. Anal Chem 1947; 19: 293-298.10.1021/ac60005a003 ↗
35. 35) Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 713-719.10.1177/00220345990780021201 ↗
36. 36) Venkata SN, Said J, Van PT. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 63-71.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00069-1 ↗
37. 37) Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators —Results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 304-317.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.003 ↗
38. 38) Bum-Soon L, Jack LF, John RC, Jerry DA. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 1-11.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-2 ↗
39. 39) Van Dijken JWV, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K. A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61: 235-240.10.1080/00016350310004575 ↗
40. 40) Nicholson JW. Adhesive dental materials and their durability. Int J Adhes Adhes 2000; 20: 11-16.10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00009-3 ↗
41. 41) Sensofar SP. SensoMap Plus 4.2, Sensofar Terrassa, Spain2007.
42. 42) Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1508-1516.10.1177/00220345970760081401 ↗
43. 43) Lu H. SJW, Nie J, Berchtold KA, Bowman CN. Development of highly reactive mono-(meth)acrylates as reactive diluents for dimethacrylate-based dental resin systems. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 7.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.041 ↗