Effect of ultraviolet light irradiation and sandblasting treatment on bond strengths between polyamide and chemical-cured resin
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ultraviolet light (UV) irradiation and sandblasting treatment on the shear bond strength between polyamide and chemical-cured resin. Three types of commercial polyamides were treated using UV irradiation, sandblasting treatment, and a combining sandblasting and UV irradiation. The shear bond strength was measured and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). Comparing shear bond strengths without surface treatment, from 4.1 to 5.7 MPa, the UV irradiation significantly increased the shear bond strengths except for Valplast, whose shear bond strengths ranged from 5.2 to 9.3 MPa. The sandblasting treatment also significantly increased the shear bond strengths (8.0 to 11.4 MPa). The combining sandblasting and UV irradiation significantly increased the shear bond strengths (15.2 to 18.3 MPa) comparing without surface treatment. This combined treatment was considered the most effective at improving the shear bond strength between polyamide and chemical-cured resin.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Yavuz T, Aykent F. Temporary flexible removable partial denture: a clinical report. Clin Dent Res 2012; 36: 41-44.
2. 2) Ito M, Wee AG, Miyamoto T, Kawai Y. The combination of a nylon and traditional partial removable dental prosthesis for improved esthetics: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 5-8.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60002-5 ↗
3. 3) Takahashi Y, Hamanaka I, Shimizu H. Effect of thermal shock on mechanical properties of injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70: 297-302.10.3109/00016357.2011.600719 ↗
4. 4) Abuzar MA, Bellur S, Duong N, Kim BB, Lu P, Palfreyman N, Surendran D, Tran VT. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methyl methacrylate). J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 577-581.10.2334/josnusd.52.577 ↗
5. 5) Takahashi H, Kawata E, Tamaki Y, Teraoka F, Hosoi T, Yoshida T. Basic properties of thermoplastic resins for denture base material referred to “non clasp denture”. J J Dent Mater 2009; 28: 161-167.
6. 6) Hamanaka I, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing repair resin to injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 1250-1254.10.3109/00016357.2012.757645 ↗
7. 7) Katsumata Y, Hojo S, Hamano N, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi H, Okada S, Teranaka T, Ino S. Bonding strength of autopolymerizing resin to nylon denture base polymer. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 409-418.10.4012/dmj.28.409 ↗
8. 8) Krevelen VDW: Nijenhuis TK, Properties of polymers. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009. p. 928-929.
9. 9) Miura E, Takayama Y, Mizuno Y, Abe M, Kawai Y, Ohkubo C. Effect of surface treatment agents on bond strength of autopolymerized acrylic resin to poly(ethylene terephthalate). Int Chin J Dent 2010; 10: 57-62.10.47416/icjd.10-4.2 ↗
10. 10) Loyaga-Rendon PG, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Reza F. Effect of ultraviolet light irradiation on bonding of experimental composite resin artificial teeth. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 805-813.10.4012/dmj.26.805 ↗
11. 11) Asakawa Y, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kobayashi M. Effect of ultraviolet light irradiation period on bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite post and core build-up composite resin. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 133-140.10.4012/dmj.2013-175 ↗
12. 12) Teare DOH, Ton C, Bradley RH. Surface characterization and ageing of ultraviolet-ozone-treated polymers using atomic force microscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Surf Interface Anal 2000; 29: 276-283.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(200004)29:4<276::AID-SIA740>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
13. 13) Mai YW, Head DR, Cotterell B, Roberts BW. Mechanical properties of nylon 6 subjected to photodegradation. J Mater Sci 1980; 15: 3057-3065.10.1007/BF00550376 ↗
14. 14) Kaczmarek H, Kamińska A, Herk VA. Photooxidative degradation of poly(alkyl methacrylate)s. Eur Polym J 2000; 36: 767-777.10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00125-1 ↗
15. 15) Çaykaraa T, Güvenb O. UV degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate) and its vinyltriethoxysilane containing copolymers. Polym Degradat Stabil 1999; 65: 225-229.10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00008-7 ↗
16. 16) Cerruti P, Lavorgna M, Carfagna C, Nicolais L. Comparison of photo-oxidative degradation of polyamide 6,6 films stabilized with HALS and CuCl2+KI mixtures. Polym 2005; 46: 4571-4583.10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.065 ↗
17. 17) Cerruti P, Carfagna C. Thermal-oxidative degradation of polyamide 6,6 containing metal salts. Polym Degradat Stabil 2010; 95: 2405-2412.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.08.014 ↗
18. 18) JIS K 6768: 1999, Plastics-Film and sheeting-Determination of wetting tension.
19. 19) Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-touse software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplants 2013; 48: 452-458.10.1038/bmt.2012.244 ↗
20. 20) Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 353-361.10.4012/dmj.2009-114 ↗
21. 21) Spori DM, Drobek T, Zürcher S, Ochsner M, Sprecher C, Mühlebach A, Spencer ND. Beyond the lotus effect: roughness influences on wetting over a wide surface-energy range. Langmuir 2008; 24: 5411-5417.10.1021/la800215r ↗
22. 22) Sharma S, Pakhan AJ, Thombare RU, Godbole SR, Gupta VK, Gupta N. Effect of surface texture of intaglio surface on denture retention—An in vivo analysis—. Chhattisgarh J Health Sci 2013; 1: 35-39.