Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to Dental Implant and Restorative Materials in vitro
Source abstract
Abstract
Bacterial adhesion to tooth surfaces or dental materials starts immediately upon exposure to the oral environment. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to saliva-coated human enamel and dental materials - during a one-hour period - using an in vitro flow chamber system which mimicked the oral cavity. After fluorescent staining, the number of adhered cells and their vitality were recorded. The dental materials used were: titanium (Rematitan M), gold (Neocast 3), ceramic (Vita Omega 900), and composite (Tetric Ceram). The number of adherent bacterial cells was higher on titanium, gold, and ceramic surfaces and lower on composite as compared to enamel. As for the percentage of adherent vital cells, it was higher on enamel than on the restorative materials tested. These results suggested that variations in the number and vitality of the adherent pioneer oral bacteria, S. sanguinis, in the in vitro system depended on the surface characteristics of the substratum and the acquired salivary pellicle. The in vitro adhesion model used herein provided a simple and reproducible approach to investigate the impact of surface-modified dental materials on bacterial adhesion and vitality.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management · Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02420.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02420.x ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.41310.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413 ↗
3. Guggenheim B, Guggenheim M, Gm& · Caries Res · 2004 · 38 · 21210.1159/000077757 ↗
4. TAKATSUKA T · Dent Mater J · 2000 · 19 · 36310.4012/dmj.19.363 ↗
5. 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00025.x10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00025.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.025 ↗
7. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl · Int Dent J · 2000 · 50 · 36110.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00569.x ↗
8. Grivet M, Morrier JJ, Benay G, Bars · J Materials Sci: Mater Med · 2000 · 11 · 63710.1023/A:1008913915399 ↗
9. Decker EM, Weiger R, von Ohle C, Wi · Clin Oral Invest · 2003 · 7 · 9810.1007/s00784-003-0202-y ↗
10. Weiger R, Decker EM, Krastl G, Brec · Arch Oral Biol · 1999 · 4 · 621
11. Dawes C, Watanabe S, Biglow-Lecomte · J Dent Res · 1989 · 68 · 147910.1177/00220345890680110201 ↗
12. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00971.x10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00971.x ↗
13. Sardin S, Morrier J-J, Benay G, Bar · J Oral Rehab · 2004 · 31 · 14010.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01136.x ↗
14. 10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-210.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-2 ↗
15. Quirynen M, Bollen CM · J Clin Periodontol · 1995 · 22 · 110.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb01765.x ↗
16. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x ↗
17. Satou J, Fukunaga A, Morikawa A, Ma · J Oral Rehabil · 1991 · 18 · 42110.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb01687.x ↗
18. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I · Clin Oral Implant Res · 2006 · 17 · 6810.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x ↗
19. 10.1074/jbc.275.12.897010.1074/jbc.275.12.8970 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00204-010.1016/S0142-9612(00)00204-0 ↗
21. Steinberg D, Eyal S · J Dent · 2002 · 30 · 4710.1016/S0300-5712(01)00058-6 ↗
22. 22) Bowden GH. Dental plaque revisited: oral biofilms in health and disease, Bioline, Cardiff, 1999, pp.211-253.
23. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, · Eur J Oral Sci · 2002 · 110 · 4810.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x ↗
24. Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski · Caries Res · 2002 · 36 · 10110.1159/000057867 ↗
25. 25) Hamilton IR, Bowden GH. Fluoride in dentistry, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1988, pp.77-103.
26. Watson PS, Pontefract HA, Devine DA · J Dent Res · 2005 · 85 · 451
27. Marsh PD · Caries Res · 2004 · 38 · 20410.1159/000077756 ↗