A comparison of the micro-shear bond strength and failure mode of non-enclosed and mold-enclosed luting cements bonded to metal
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare 1) the mean micro-shear bond strength and 2) failure mode of cements to metals in nonenclosed and mold-enclosed specimens. Specimens were prepared in mold-enclosed and non-enclosed formats from two RMGIC's and a self-adhesive resin-cement. 3-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare mean µSBS results (α=0.05). Failure mode was analysed with Pearson's chi-square test (α=0.05). µSBS was significantly affected by the factors substrate and method (p<0.001) but not by material (p=0.077). There was an interaction between substrate, method and material F (2,144)=3.57, p=0.031, and method and material (2,144)=5.86, p=0.004. All mold-enclosed specimens for the three cements bonded to titanium and non-precious metal exhibited higher (p<0.001) mean µSBS than the non-enclosed specimens. Within this study, mold-enclosed specimens exhibited significantly higher (p<0.001) mean µSBS and adhesive failure compared to non-enclosed specimens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 380-388.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-9 ↗
2. 2) Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 373-377.
3. 3) Weerasinghe DS, Nikaido T, Wettasinghe KA, Abayakoon JB, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength and morphological analysis of a self-etching primer adhesive system to fluorosed enamel. J Dent 2005; 33: 419-426.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.004 ↗
4. 4) Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, Tang G, Austin D, Ch’ng C, Burrow MF, Thomas DL. Comparison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Aust Dent J 2006; 51: 252-257.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00438.x ↗
5. 5) Okada H, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of current one-step adhesives to cementum and dentin. Am J Dent 2009; 22: 259-263.
6. 6) Tashkandi E. Effect of surface treatment on the micro-shear bond strength to zirconia. Saud Dent J 2009; 21: 113-116.10.1016/j.sdentj.2009.10.002 ↗
7. 7) Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: A critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e78-e93.10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗
8. 8) De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. Testing bond strength: A review of the literature. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e139-e140.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.109 ↗
9. 9) Kermanshah H, Borougeni AT, Bitaraf T. Comparison of the microshear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to enamel with three luting resins. J Prosthodont Res 2011; 55: 110-116.10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.002 ↗
10. 10) Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 120-128.10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00018-9 ↗
11. 11) Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-e121.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 ↗
12. 12) Tamura Y, Tsubota K, Otsuka E, Endo H, Takubo C, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Dentin bonding: influence of bonded surface area and crosshead speed on bond strength. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 206-211.10.4012/dmj.2010-157 ↗
13. 13) Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e50-e62.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155 ↗
14. 14) Braga RR, Meira JBC, Boaro LCC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e38-e49.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150 ↗
15. 15) Mair L, Padipatvuthikul P. Variables related to materials and preparing for bond g irrespective of the test protocol. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e17-e23.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.154 ↗
16. 16) Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17: 61-67.10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0 ↗
17. 17) Placido E, Meira JBC, Lima RG, Muench A, Souza RMd, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: A finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1086-1092.10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002 ↗
18. 18) Bucknall CB. New criterion for craze initiation. Polymer. 2007; 48 : 1030-1041.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.033 ↗
19. 19) McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MYM, Schumacher GE, Schultheisz CR. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 3603-3608.10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00089-3 ↗
20. 20) DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 126-131.10.1016/0109-5641(95)80047-6 ↗
21. 21) Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1591-1596.10.1177/00220345950740091401 ↗
22. 22) Liu HL, Lin CL, Sun MT, Chang YH, Liu PR. Damage accumulation simulations in the adhesive of enamel/ceramic interface using the FE submodelling and the element deactivation approaches. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 199-206.
23. 23) Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 889-893.10.1177/00220345910700050501 ↗
24. 24) Shimaoka AM, De Andrade AP, Cardoso MV, De Carvalho RC. The importance of adhesive area delimitation in a microshear bond strength experimental design. J Adhes Dent 2010; 13: 307-314 .
25. 25) El Zohairy AA, Saber MH, Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 848-854.10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.010 ↗
26. 26) Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Harada N, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 298-304.10.1016/0109-5641(95)80024-7 ↗
27. 27) ISO TC 106/SC 1N ISO/CD 29022 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched edge shear bond strength test 2010.
28. 28) Rasmussen S. Analysis of dental shear bond strength tests, shear or tensile? Int J Adhes Adhes 1996; 16: 147-153.10.1016/0143-7496(95)00029-1 ↗
29. 29) Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Predictions of cement microfracture under crowns using 3D-FEA. J Prosthodont 2000; 9: 201-209.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2000.00201.x ↗
30. 30) Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 699-705.10.1177/00220345990780021001 ↗
31. 31) ISO TS 11405 Dental materials —Testing of adhesion to tooth structure 2003.
32. 32) Pecora N, Yaman P, Dennison J, Herrero A. Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing devices. J Prosthodont Dent 2002; 88: 511-515.10.1067/mpr.2002.129063 ↗
33. 33) Banomyong D, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF, Messer HH. Effect of dentin conditioning on dentin permeability and micro-shear bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115: 502-509.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00483.x ↗
34. 34) Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RH. Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 591-598.10.1590/S1678-77572010000600010 ↗