Effect of Enamel Shades on Color of Layered Resin Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the covering enamel layer of various thicknesses on the color of layered resin composites (LRC). To this end, the CIELAB parameters of the following were evaluated: underlying base (ULB: 2.0 mm of body shade + 3.0 mm of opaque shade), inherent color of the enamel shade (4.0 mm of enamel shade + ULB), and LRC disks (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 mm of enamel shade + ULB) of Filtek Supreme (FS, 3M) and Gradia Direct (GD, GC). To assess the effect of the enamel layer on the color of LRC, color difference between ULB and LRC was calculated. With FS, the enamel layer had no major effect on the color of LRC--regardless of thickness. With GD, the enamel layer had a significant effect on the color of LRC, even if the thickness was only 0.5 mm. The difference in enamel layer effect between the two products could be attributed to the difference in color characteristics of the two enamel shades.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 1)Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34 (6) : 849-853.10.1177/00220345550340060801 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.82016030710.1002/jbm.820160307 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x ↗
4. 4)Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 418-423.10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70036-9 ↗
5. 5)Lee YK, Powers JM. Calculation of colour resulting from composite/ compomer layering techniques. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1102-1108.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01353.x ↗
6. 6)Powers JM, Dennision JB, Lepeak PJ. Parameters that affect the color of direct restorative resins. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 876-880.10.1177/00220345780570090701 ↗
7. 7)Miyagawa Y, Powers JM, O'brien WJ. Optical properties of direct restorative materials. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 890-894.10.1177/00220345810600050601 ↗
8. FUJITA MEGUMI · 2005 · 24 · 11110.4012/dmj.24.111 ↗
9. KAMISHIMA NAOKO · 2005 · 24 · 42810.4012/dmj.24.428 ↗
10. 10)Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 79-86.
11. 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80017-610.1016/S0109-5641(97)80017-6 ↗
12. 12)Ikeda T, Murata Y, Sano H. Translucency of opaque-shade resin composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 127-130.
13. 13)Ikeda T, Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Fujita M, Sano H. Colour and translucency of opaque-shades and body-shades of resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113 (2) : 170-173.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00205.x ↗
14. 14)Lee YK, Powers JM. Color and optical properties of resin-based composites for bleached teeth after polymerization and accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 349-354.
15. 15)Paravina RD, Ontiveros JC, Powers JM. Curing-dependent changes in color and translucency parameter of composite bleach shades. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; 14: 158-166.10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00516.x ↗
16. 16)O'Brien WJ. Double layer effect and other optical phenomena related to esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29: 667-672.10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02121-8 ↗
17. 17)Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1760-1764.10.1177/00220345890680120801 ↗
18. 18)Davis BK, Johnston WM, Saba RF. Kubelka-Munk reflectance theory applied to porcelain veneer systems using a colorimeter. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 227-233.
19. 19)Gross MD, Moser JB. A colorimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 311-322.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00997.x ↗