Shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive pit and fissure sealant
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive-based fissure sealant (EG) on aprismatic enamel in comparison to conventional fissure sealing with 30 s acid etching (CG). The fissures were sealed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups: 1-day water storage, 3-month water storage, and 5,000× thermocycling. After measuring SBS using the Ultradent method, failure mode was analyzed. In additional 16 teeth, microleakage was tested using dye penetration method. Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-Test. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess the factors influencing on SBS. EG had significantly lower mean SBS (4.1 MPa±2.1) than the CG (17.6 MPa±6.4). CG (1.1%) performed significantly better than the EG (12.8%) in microleakage analysis. The tested EG yielded significantly inferior results and its clinical use should be decided after weighing its pros and cons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Pathology, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University
Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Kühnisch J, Galler M, Seitz M, Stich H, Lussi A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, Bücher K. Irregularities below the enamel-dentin junction may predispose for fissure caries. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 1066-1070.10.1177/0022034512458688 ↗
2. 2) Hannigan A, O‘Mullane DM, Barry D, Schäfer F, Roberts AJ. A caries susceptibility classification of tooth surfaces by survival time. Caries Res 2000; 34: 103-108.10.1159/000016576 ↗
3. 3) Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1: Cd003067.10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4 ↗
4. 4) Tinanoff N, Coll JA, Dhar V, Maas WR, Chhibber S, Zokaei L.Evidence-based update of pediatric dental restorative procedures: Preventive strategies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39: 193-197.10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.193 ↗
5. 5) Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis NA. Eapd guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2004; 5: 179-184.
6. 6) Dionysopoulos D, Sfeikos T, Tolidis K. Fluoride release and recharging ability of new dental sealants. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015; 17: 45-51.10.1007/s40368-015-0200-1 ↗
7. 7) Ushimura S, Nakamura K, Matsuda Y, Minamikawa H, Abe S, Yawaka Y. Assessment of the inhibitory effects of fissure sealants on the demineralization of primary teeth using an automatic ph-cycling system. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 316-324.10.4012/dmj.2015-297 ↗
8. 8) Kaga M, Kakuda S, Ida Y, Toshima H, Hashimoto M, Endo K, Sano H. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by buffering effect of s-prg filler-containing dental sealant. Eur J Oral Sci 2014; 122: 78-83.10.1111/eos.12107 ↗
9. 9) Chiang ML, Birlbauer S, Lo YF, Pitchika V, Crispin A, Ilie N, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Which factors influence the shear bond strength of sealant materials? J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 397-404.
10. 10) International Organisation for Standardisation. Iso 29022. Dentistry-adhesion-notched-edge shear bond strength test; 2013.
11. 11) Wadenya RO, Yego C, Blatz MB, Mante F. Bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch sealant. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 559-563.
12. 12) Dhillon JK, Pathak A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or self-etching primer. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012; 30: 288-292.10.4103/0970-4388.108922 ↗
13. 13) Margvelashvili M, Vichi A, Carrabba M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Bond strength to unground enamel and sealing ability in pits and fissures of a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 37: 397-402.10.17796/jcpd.37.4.q4753m663808652w ↗
14. 14) Javadinejad S, Razavi M, Birang R, Atefat M. In vitro study of microleakage of different techniques of surface preparation used in pits and fissures. Indian J Dent Res 2012; 23: 247-250.10.4103/0970-9290.100435 ↗
15. 15) Bassir L, Khanehmasjedi M, Nasr E, Kaviani A. An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23: 806-810.10.4103/0970-9290.111267 ↗
16. 16) Schuldt C, Birlbauer S, Pitchika V, Crispin A, Hickel R, Ilie N, Kühnisch J. Shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etching/self-adhesive pit and fissure sealant. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 491-497.
17. 17) Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1605-1614.10.1177/00220345010800070301 ↗
18. 18) Heintze SD, Zimmerli B. Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: In vitro tests of adhesive systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2011; 121: 1024-1040.