Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the 3-dimensional (3D) fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition, in comparison with milled zirconia and lithium disilicate monolithic crowns. Dual-scan protocol was used to assess the fit of crowns. Root mean squares (RMS) and uniformity index (UI) were calculated to describe the gap size and uniformity. The self-glazed zirconia crowns had significantly lower RMS values for the gaps at axial wall and transition regions than the milled zirconia crowns, and for the gaps at occlusal region than both milled crowns. All 3 types of crowns had comparable RMS values for the gaps at marginal and chamfer regions and comparable UI values for both marginal and internal gaps. The 3D fit of the self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns was clinically acceptable and they exhibited better fit at occlusal region than the milled crowns.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Stomatology Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 1082-1091.10.1177/0022034518779759 ↗
2. 2) Tang Z, Zhao X, Wang H, Liu B. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: 173-185.10.1097/MD.0000000000017385 ↗
3. 3) Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 411-450.
4. 4) Kaizer MR, Bano S, Borba M. Wear behavior of graded glass/zirconia crowns and their antagonists. J Dent Res 2019; 98: 437-442.10.1177/0022034518820918 ↗
5. 5) Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 22-29.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0 ↗
6. 6) Shen Z, Zhao J, inventors. HANGZHOU ERRAN Technology Co., Ltd., assignee. Dental all-ceramic restoration and manufacturing method thereof. US patent 55,303,877. 2015 August 11.
7. 7) Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang D, Ma J, Liu L, Shen Z. Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016; 36: 2889-2894.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029 ↗
8. 8) Maske TT, Hollanders A, Kuper NK, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans M. A threshold gap size for in situ secondary caries lesion development. J Dent 2018; 80: 36-40.10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.014 ↗
9. 9) Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle C. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 116: 272-279.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x ↗
10. 10) Li R, Chen H, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Shen Z, Sun Y. Three-dimensional trueness and margin quality of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64: 478-484.10.1016/j.jpor.2020.01.002 ↗
11. 11) Li R, Li W, Wang Y, Sun Y. Knife-edged crown fabricated by 3-dimensional gel deposition and soft milling. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 21: 221-223.10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.011 ↗
12. 12) Boitelle P, Tapie L, Mawussi B, Fromentin O. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: Comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 75-81.10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.026 ↗
13. 13) Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1273-1278.10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006 ↗
14. 14) Schlenz MA, Vogler JAH, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: A new intraoral scan–based approach. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 24: 2459-2468.10.1007/s00784-019-03108-3 ↗
15. 15) Kane LM, Chronaios D, Sierraalta M, George FM. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 680-685.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.020 ↗
16. 16) Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent 1999; 27: 479-485.10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00027-5 ↗
17. 17) Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 320-326.10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008 ↗
18. 18) McLean JW, Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-111.10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708 ↗
19. 19) Hamad KQ, Quran FA, Jalam SA, Baba NZ. Comparison of the accuracy of fit of metal, zirconia, and lithium disilicate crowns made from different manufacturing techniques. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 497-503.10.1111/jopr.13029 ↗
20. 20) Riccitiello F, Amato M, Leone R, Spagnuolo G, Sorrentino R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia and lithium disilicate single crowns: Micro-CT comparison between different manufacturing procedures. Open Dent J 2018; 12: 160-172.10.2174/1874210601812010160 ↗
21. 21) Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez SC, Suarez MJ. The Marginal fit of CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 299-304.10.1111/jopr.12590 ↗
22. 22) Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: A scanning electron microscopy analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 480-487.10.11607/jomi.2759 ↗
23. 23) Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Ronold HJ. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 2018; 126: 512-517.10.1111/eos.12576 ↗
24. 24) Zhang Y, Han J, Zheng G, Lin H, Bai W. Fatigue behaviours of the zirconia dental restorations prepared by two manufacturing methods. Adv Appl Ceram 2017; 116: 368-375.10.1080/17436753.2017.1336365 ↗
25. 25) Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 820-826.10.4012/dmj.26.820 ↗
26. 26) Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della BA. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1119-1126.10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004 ↗
27. 27) Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 390-407.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x ↗
28. 28) Jager ND, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 242-251.10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.013 ↗
29. 29) Ferrairo BM, Piras FF, Lima FF, Honório HM, Rubo JH. Comparison of marginal adaptation and internal fit of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns produced by 4 different CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 2029-2036.10.1007/s00784-020-03511-1 ↗
30. 30) Wu L, Sun Z, Zhao J, Zheng Y. Retrospective clinical study of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a straightforward completely digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.018.10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.018 ↗
31. 31) Sun Z, Wu L, Zhao J, Zheng Y. Aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth with different coloured substrates using digital monolithic zirconia crowns: two case reports. Adv Appl Ceram 2021; 120: 169-174.10.1080/17436753.2021.1915086 ↗
32. 32) Shen Z, Liu L, Xu X, Zhao J, Eriksson M, Zhong Y, et al. Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability. J Eur Ceram Soc 2017; 37: 4339-4345.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008 ↗