Effect of dentin location and long-term water storage on bonding effectiveness of dentin adhesives
Source abstract
Abstract
Dentin is a variable substrate with properties that change considerable in a single surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding effectiveness to these different dentin locations and evaluate these differences over time. After bonding procedures with five different adhesives, small micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) beams were prepared and dichotomously divided in 'center' and 'periphery' dentin specimens. After 1 week, 3, 6 and 12 months of water storage the µTBS of specimens of each group was determined, enabling a paired study design. The bond strengths of both etch&rinse adhesives were insensitive to regional variability. For the two-step self-etch adhesives, a marked increase in bond strengths was observed with increasing amount of intertubular dentin. Regional variability did not affect the long-term bonding effectiveness for any of the adhesives tested. In conclusion, only for the mild self-etch adhesives, µTBS to 'periphery' dentin was higher than for the 'center' specimens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-110.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 ↗
2. 2) Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 315-324.
3. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00003-310.1016/S0109-5641(01)00003-3 ↗
4. 4) Tam LE, Yim D. Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent 1997; 25: 339-346.10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00031-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.024 ↗
6. 6) Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent 2007; 35: 371-376.10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.005 ↗
7. 7) Loguercio AD, Uceda-Gomez N, Carrilho MR, Reis A. Influence of specimen size and regional variation on long-term resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 224-231.10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.012 ↗
8. 10.1177/0022034599078002100110.1177/00220345990780021001 ↗
9. 9) Yesilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 26-36.10.5005/jcdp-7-2-26 ↗
10. 10) Sengun A, Unlü N, Ozturk B, Ozer F. Microtensile bond strength of two resin composite materials placed with direct and indirect techniques under simulated pulpal pressure. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 197-202.
11. 11) McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding agents–characteristic bond strength as a function of dentine depth. J Dent 1992; 20: 225-230.10.1016/0300-5712(92)90087-S ↗
12. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00013-510.1016/S0109-5641(99)00013-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00090-910.1016/0003-9969(95)00090-9 ↗
14. 14) Van Meerbeek B, Vargas S, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 26: S119-S144.
15. 15) Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonoccore memorial lecture: adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
16. 16) De Munck J, Van den Steen P, Mine A, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, Van Meerbeek B. Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 1101-1106.10.1177/0022034509346952 ↗
17. 17) De Munck J, Van Den Steen PE, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, Van Meerbeek B. Enzymatic Degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces produced by Mild self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2010 (accepted).10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00758.x ↗
18. 10.4012/dmj.26.69410.4012/dmj.26.694 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.82029091110.1002/jbm.820290911 ↗
20. 20) Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 99-116.
21. 21) De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 39-49.
22. 22) Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 97-103.
23. 23) Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL. Micromechanical analysis of dentin/adhesive interface by the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res B 2004; 70: 56-65.10.1002/jbm.b.30012 ↗
24. 24) Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, Koshiro K, Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Sano H. Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B 2007; 80: 297-303.10.1002/jbm.b.30597 ↗
25. 25) Koshiro K, Sidhu SK, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H. New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. J Biomed Mater Res B 2006; 77: 401-408.10.1002/jbm.b.30450 ↗
26. 26) Ermis R, De Munck J, Vivan Cardoso M, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 978-985.10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.019 ↗
27. 10.1177/15440591050840020410.1177/154405910508400204 ↗