journal article·2011Open access

Fatigue performance of joints executed in pure titanium structures with several diameters

Juliana Maria Costa NUÑEZ-PANTOJA, Luis Geraldo VAZ, Mauro Antônio de Arruda NÓBILO, Marcelo Ferraz MESQUITA

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 30· Issue 6

Abstract

This study evaluated fatigue strength of CP-Ti laser-welded joints. Sixty (20/diameter) CP-Ti casted dumbbell rods with diameters of 1.5, 2.0, and 3.5 mm were sectioned and welded using two joint openings (0.0 (00) and 0.6 mm (06)). Six groups were formed, amounting to a total of 9 (n=10) with inclusion of intact groups. Welding was executed using 360 V/8 ms (1.5 and 2.0 mm) and 380 V/9 ms (3.5 mm). Joints were finished, polished, and submitted to radiographic examination to visually analyze presence of porosity (PP). Specimens were submitted to cyclic tests, and the number of cycles until failure (NC) was recorded. Fractured surfaces were examined by SEM. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (α=0.05) tests demonstrated that NC was lower for all diameters with 06, and for 3.5 mm/00. NC and PP were found to have a negative correlation (Spearman Coefficient). For CP-Ti frameworks with thin diameters, laser welding is better when structures are juxtaposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Dental materials and restorations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School

Department of Dentistry Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Eylon D, Newman JR, Thorne JK. Titanium and titanium alloys castings. In: Metals handbook. 10 ed. Metals Park: ASM; 1990. v.2, p. 634-646.10.31399/asm.hb.v02.a0001082 ↗
2. 2) Blackman R, Barghi N, Tran C. Dimensional changes in casting titanium removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 309-315.10.1016/0022-3913(91)90181-U ↗
3. 3) Wang RR, Fenton A. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: A review of the literature. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 401-408.
4. 4) Jones TK, Hansen CA, Singer MT, Kessler HP. Dental implications of nickel hypersensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 507-509.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90398-7 ↗
5. 5) Taira M, Moser JB, Greener EH. Studies of Ti alloys for dental castings. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 45-50.10.1016/0109-5641(89)90093-6 ↗
6. 6) Philips RW. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11.ed. St Louis: Saunders, An Imprint of Elsevier Science; 2003.
7. 7) Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 245-253.
8. 8) Chai T, Chou CK. Mechanical properties of laser-welded cast titanium joints under different conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 477-483.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70165-9 ↗
9. 9) Zavanelli RA, Guilherme AS, Pessanha-Henriques GE, de Arruda Nóbilo MA, Mesquita MF. Corrosion-fatigue of laser-repaired commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy under different test environments. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1029-1034.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01336.x ↗
10. 10) Wang RR, Boyle AM. A simple method for inspection of porosity in titanium castings. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 275-276.10.1016/0022-3913(93)90065-V ↗
11. 11) Nuñez JM, Takahashi JM, Henriques GE, Nóbilo MA, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Radiographic inspection of porosity in pure titanium dumbbell castings. Gerodontology 2010 May 26. [Epub ahead of print]
12. 12) Nuñez-Pantoja JM, Vaz LG, Nóbilo MA, Henriques GE, Mesquita MF. Effects of laser-weld joint opening size on fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V structures with several diameters. J Oral Rehabil 2010 Jul 29. [Epub ahead of print]10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02140.x ↗
13. 13) Lampman S. Wrought titanium and titanium alloys. In: Metal handbook. 10 ed. Metals Park: ASM; 1990. V.2, p. 592-633.10.31399/asm.hb.v02.a0001081 ↗
14. 14) Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:107-113.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8 ↗
15. 15) Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 167-178.
16. 16) Sjögren G, Andersson M, Bergman M. Laser welding of titanium in dentistry. Acta Odontol Scand 1988; 46: 247-253.10.3109/00016358809004774 ↗
17. 17) Berg E, Wagner WC, Davik G, Dootz ER. Mechanical properties of laser-welded cast and wrought titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 250-257.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80131-3 ↗
18. 18) Wiskott HW, Doumas MT, Scherrer SS, Susz C, Belser UC. Microstructures of brazings and welds using grade 2 commercilly pure titanium. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 40-47.
19. 19) Roggensach M, Walter MH, Böning KW. Studies on laser plasma welded titanium. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 104-107.10.1016/0109-5641(93)90084-4 ↗
20. 20) Watanabe I, Topham DS. Laser welding of cast titanium and dental alloys using argon shielding. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 102-107.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00082.x ↗
21. 21) Guilherme AS, Henriques GE, Zavanelli RA, Mesquita MF. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 378-385.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.010 ↗
22. 22) Monday JJ, Asgar K. Tensile strength comparison of presoldered and postsoldered joints. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 23-27.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90065-X ↗
23. 23) Tambasco J, Anthony T, Sandven O. Laser welding in the dental laboratory: an alternative to soldering. J Dent Technol 1996; 13: 23-31.
24. 24) Zavanelli RA, Pessanha Henriques GE, Ferreira I, De Almeida Rollo JM. Corrosion-fatigue life of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloys in different storage environments. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 274-279.10.1067/mpr.2000.108758 ↗
25. 25) ASTM International. Designation: E 8M – 04: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials [Metric]. West Conshohocken; 2004. p.24.
26. 26) Birkeland JM. The effect of pH on the interaction of fluoride and salivary ions. Caries Res 1973; 7: 11-18.10.1159/000259820 ↗
27. 27) Wang RR, Welsch GE. Joining titanium materials with tungsten inert gas welding, laser welding, and infrared brazing. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 521-530.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80356-7 ↗
28. 28) Neo TK, Chai J, Gilbert JL, Wozniak WT, Engelman MJ. Mechanical properties of titanium connectors. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 379-393.
29. 29) Baba N, Watanabe I. Penetration depth into dental casting alloys by Nd:YAG laser. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 72: 64-68.10.1002/jbm.b.30117 ↗
30. 30) Wiskott HWA, Doumas T, Scherrer SS, Belser UC, Susz C. Mechanical and structural characteristics of commercially pure grade 2 Ti welds and solder joints. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12: 719-725.10.1023/A:1011224710916 ↗
31. 31) Togaya T, Shinosaki T. Introduction to laser welding in dentistry (1). Quint Dent Tech 1999; 24: 740-749.
32. 32) Zupancic R, Legat A, Funduk N. Tensile strength and corrosion resistance of brazed and laser-welded cobalt-chromium alloy joints. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 273-282.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.006 ↗
33. 33) Henriques GE, Consani S, Rollo JM, Andrade e Silva F. Soldering and remelting influence on fatigue strength of cobalt-chromium alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 146-152.10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70118-5 ↗
34. 34) Vallittu PK, Luotio K. Effects of cobalt-chromium alloy surface casting on resistance to deflection fatigue and surface hardness of titanium. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 527-532.