Surface roughness and morphology of resin composites polished with two-step polishing systems
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate surface roughness (Ra) and morphology of supra-nanofilled [Estelite Omega (EO), Estelite ∑ Quick (EQ)], micro-hybrid [Esthet.X HD (EHD), G-aenial (GAE)] and nano-hybrid [Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CMP), Charisma Diamond (CD), Beautifil II (BII)] composites polished with two-step polishing systems [Enhance/PoGo (EP); Venus Supra (VS)]. Composite discs, 30 of each type, were prepared. Each composite group was divided into three subgroups: Mylar (control), EP and VS. Ra was evaluated with profilometer. In each composite group, the control had the lowest Ra. With both polishing systems, EO and EQ had significantly the lowest Ra, whereas CMP and BII had the highest. Except for GAE, CD and BII, the differences in Ra between EP and VS in each composite group were significant, showing smoother surfaces for EP. Supra-nanofilled composites created smoother surfaces than nano-hybrids, and their performance was similar or slightly better than that of micro-hybrids.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4012/dmj.2008-03110.4012/dmj.2008-031 ↗
2. 2) Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 560-567.
3. 10.1038/sj.bdj.481088110.1038/sj.bdj.4810881 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-310.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
5. 5) Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, Garcia-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent 2005; 18:173-176.
6. 10.4012/dmj.26.61310.4012/dmj.26.613 ↗
7. 7) McConnell MD, Liu Y, Nowak AP, Pilch S, Masters JG, Composto RJ. Bacterial plaque retention on oral hard materials: effect of surface roughness, surface composition and physisorbed polycarboxylate. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 92: 1518-1527.10.1002/jbm.a.32493 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb01765.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb01765.x ↗
9. 10.2341/07-10710.2341/07-107 ↗
10. 10.2341/06-5610.2341/06-56 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.01410.1016/j.dental.2009.09.014 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cden.2006.12.00210.1016/j.cden.2006.12.002 ↗
13. 13) Antonson SA, Yazıcı RA, Kılınc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011; 19S: e9-e17.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006 ↗
14. 10.2341/05-15410.2341/05-154 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.01210.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.012 ↗
16. 16) Gönülol N, Yılmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012; 40S: e64-e70.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005 ↗
17. 10.4012/dmj.2009-01910.4012/dmj.2009-019 ↗
18. 10.2341/06-10110.2341/06-101 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.02010.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 ↗
20. 10.1177/002203451036376510.1177/0022034510363765 ↗
21. 10.2341/08-043-L10.2341/08-043-L ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.01110.1016/j.dental.2004.10.011 ↗
23. 23) Fuzzi M, Zaccheroni Z, Vallania G. Scanning electron microscopy and profilometer evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 452-458.
24. 24) Van Meerbeek B, Vargas S, Inoue Y, Yoshida Y, Perdigao P, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 3D-18D.
25. 10.1007/s10856-006-0675-810.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 ↗
26. 26) Jung M, Otte A, Klimek J. Is surface roughness of resin composites affected by operator’s performance. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 3-6.
27. 27) Bota AC, Duarte S Jr, Filho PIP, Gheno SM. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy. Microsc Microanal 2008; 14: 380-386.10.1017/S1431927608080768 ↗
28. 28) Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
29. 29) Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325-330.10.1016/0109-5641(94)90041-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.00710.1016/j.jds.2012.05.007 ↗
31. 10.1177/088532820404401110.1177/0885328204044011 ↗
32. 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.031410.14219/jada.archive.2005.0314 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.06.01110.1016/j.actbio.2007.06.011 ↗
34. 34) Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent 2013; 38: E1-E12.10.2341/12-122-L ↗
35. 10.2334/josnusd.53.28310.2334/josnusd.53.283 ↗
36. 36) Lefever D, Perakis N, Roig M, Krejci I, Ardu S. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 54-58.
37. 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.005410.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054 ↗
38. 38) Sekiya K, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Iwaku M. In vivo wear pattern of experimental composite resins based on different resin monomers. Dent Mater 1993; 1: 12-14.10.4012/dmj.12.145 ↗
39. 39) Takahashi H, Finger WJ, Endo T, Kanehira M, Koottathape N, Komatsu M, Balkenhol M. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am J Dent 2011; 24: 264-270.