Digital veneering system enhances microtensile bond strength at zirconia coreveneer interface
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of digital veneering system (DVS) on strengthening the bond between a zirconia core and ceramic veneer. Specimens for Groups 1 (negative control), 2 (positive control), 3, and 4 used conventional porcelain veneering technique on untreated, sandblasted, coloring agent-treated, and modifier-treated zirconia cores respectively. Group 5 used DVS, where glass ceramic veneers—produced by computer-aided milling—were fused to zirconia cores. Microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) at the interface were measured. MTBS results of Groups 1 to 5, expressed in mean (standard deviation), were 28.1 (7.3), 27.8 (6.3), 30.0 (10.2), 32.9 (8.1), and 37.8 (8.1) MPa. The DVS group had significantly higher MTBS than the negative and positive controls (p<0.05). Results showed that DVS enhanced the bond strength between zirconia core and ceramic veneer, indicating that this system could reduce adhesive failure-related complications that frequently occur at the zirconia core-veneer interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-610.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6 ↗
2. 2) Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A, Rinke S. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 141-148.
3. 3) Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 383-388.
4. 4) Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, Franz Hammerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 685-693.
5. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.00710.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.007 ↗
6. 6) Griffin JD Jr. Combining monolithic zirconia crowns, digital impressioning, and regenerative cement for a predictable restorative alternative to PFM. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013; 34: 212-222.
7. 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.29610.4047/jap.2013.5.3.296 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.00410.1016/j.dental.2013.09.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90341-810.1016/S0022-3913(96)90341-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.01310.1016/j.dental.2004.03.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.00310.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.01410.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00306.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00306.x ↗
14. 14) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 9-13.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00244.x ↗
15. 10.4012/dmj.27.44810.4012/dmj.27.448 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.01310.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00784-013-0923-510.1007/s00784-013-0923-5 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00889.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00889.x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.027 ↗
20. 10.1177/0022034595074009140110.1177/00220345950740091401 ↗
21. 10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-010.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00012-310.1016/S0300-5712(99)00012-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-110.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 ↗
24. 10.4012/dmj.27.84910.4012/dmj.27.849 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-910.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.02010.1016/j.dental.2010.03.020 ↗
27. 27) Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metalsupported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 493-502.
28. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.00910.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009 ↗
29. 29) Pelaez J, Cogolludo PG, Serrano B, Serrano JF, Suarez MJ. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 451-458.