Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the fracture load and the fracture pattern of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Twenty standardized steel dies were prepared to receive posterior 3-unit FDPs. Specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=10): (1) Lava Zirconia, and (2) Lava Plus. All FDPs were cemented using glass ionomer cement and subjected to thermal and mechanical cycling at 5-55ºC with a 30-s dwell time for 120,000 masticatory cycles. All specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test until fracture. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's t test, paired t-test and Weibull statistics (α=0.05). No differences were observed in fracture load between the groups. Veneering ceramic fractured before than framework in veneered zirconia group. The fracture pattern was different. The tested groups demonstrated clinically acceptable fracture load values. Monolithic zirconia solves the chipping problem.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Buccofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense
Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 531-539.10.2334/josnusd.52.531 ↗
2. 2) Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, L Lozano JF. Comparative analysis between two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 374-377.
3. 3) Peláez J, Cogolludo P, Serrano B, L Lozano JF, Suárez MJ. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: Three-year clinical results. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 373-379.10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8 ↗
4. 4) Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 476-482.10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013 ↗
5. 5) Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-826.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008 ↗
6. 6) Rodríguez V, Castillo R, López-Suárez C, Gonzalo E, Peláez J, Suárez MJ. Fracture load before and after veneering zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont 2016; 25: 550-556.10.1111/jopr.12357 ↗
7. 7) Sailer I, Gottner J, Känel S, Hämmerle C. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: A 3-year Follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 553-560.
8. 8) Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 641-652.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02094.x ↗
9. 9) Pelaez J, Cogolludo P, Serrano B, L Lozano JF, Suarez MJ. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 451-458.
10. 10) Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: A systematic Review. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 170-177.10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1 ↗
11. 11) Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 121-128.10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019 ↗
12. 12) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 857-863.10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014 ↗
13. 14) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 9-13.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00244.x ↗
14. 15) Kim SH, Han JS, Kim SH, Lee JB, Hasn JS, Yeo IS. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5: 296-304.10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.296 ↗
15. 16) Mitov G, Anastassova-Yoshida Y, Nothdurft FP, von See C, Pospiech P. Influence of the preparation design and artificial aging on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 30-36.10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.30 ↗
16. 17) Vidotti HA, Pereira JR, Insaurralde E, de Almeida AL, do Valle AL. Thermo and mechanical cycling and veneering method do not influence Y-TZP core/veneer interface bond strength. J Dent 2013; 41: 307-312.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.12.001 ↗
17. 18) Guazzato M, Proos K, Sara G, Swain MV. Strength, reliability, and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/core ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 142-149.
18. 19) López-Suarez C, Gonzalo E, Pelaez J, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Fracture resistance and failure mode of posterior fixed dental prostheses constructed with two zirconia CAD/CAM systems. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: e250-253.10.4317/jced.52067 ↗
19. 20) Lameira DP, Buarque e Silva WA, Andrade e Silva F, De Souza GM. Fracture strength of aged monolithic and bilayer zirconia-based crowns. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 418641.10.1155/2015/418641 ↗
20. 21) Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman-Rodriguez Jl, Granell-Ruiz M, del Rio-Highsmtih J, Sola-Ruiz MF. Zirconia versus metal; A preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behaviuor. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 294-300.
21. 23) Suttor D, Hauptmann H, Frank S, Hoescheler S. Fracture resistance of posterior all ceramic zirconia bridges. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 640.
22. 24) Flinn BD, deGroot DA, Mancl LA, Raigrodski AJ. Accelerated aging characteristics of three yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline dental materials. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 223-230.10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60166-8 ↗
23. 25) Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia GM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent 2004; 32: 451-457.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.009 ↗
24. 26) Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 557-562.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015 ↗
25. 27) Tsalouchou E, Cattell MJ, Knowles JC, Pittayachawan P, McDonald A. Fatigue and fracture properties of yttria partially stabilized zirconia crown systems. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 308-318.10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.011 ↗
26. 28) Borba M, de Araujo MD, de Lima E, Yoshimura HN, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della Bona A. Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic structures. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1259-1266.10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.008 ↗
27. 29) Guess PC, Schultheis S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 264-273.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60374-1 ↗
28. 30) Ludwig K. Fracture Strength of all-ceramic anterior fixed partial dentures. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 998.
29. 31) Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1668-1677.10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.016 ↗
30. 32) Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 247-257.10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60133-3 ↗
31. 33) Agustin-Panadero R, Román-Rodríguez JL, Ferreiroa A, Solá-Ruíz MF, Fons-Font A. Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literatura review. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6: e66-73.10.4317/jced.51304 ↗
32. 34) Sundh A, Sjögren G. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 778-784.10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.006 ↗
33. 35) Larsson C, Holm L, Lövgren N, Kokubo Y, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 702-709.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01770.x ↗
34. 36) Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ. Mechanical and fracture behavior of veneered-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 115-123.10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.009 ↗
35. 37) Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 901-905.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01544.x ↗
36. 38) Castillo Oyagüe R, Sánchez-Jorge MI, Sánchez Turrión A. Influence of CAD/CAM scanning method and tooth-preparation design on the vertical misfit of zirconia Crown copings. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 341-346.
37. 39) Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, L Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 378-384.10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0 ↗
38. 40) De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 999-1007.10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.005 ↗
39. 41) Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, Takanashi T, Furuya K, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 910-917.10.4012/dmj.2015-107 ↗