Mechanical properties of experimental silicone soft lining materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of experimental silicone elastomers, Silastic(®) MDX 4-4210 reinforced with silica fillers, to assess its potential as a denture soft lining material. The mechanical properties measured included tensile strength, percentage elongation, tear strength, and Shore A hardness. Using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test, the results indicated that silicone elastomers with filler loadings of 6, 8, and 10 phr had significantly greater tensile strength, percentage elongation, tear strength with a softer surface compared with commercial materials (p<0.001). In conclusion, the experimental silicone elastomers revealed acceptable mechanical properties to be used as denture soft lining materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Wright PS. Composition and properties of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures. J Dent 1981; 9: 210-223.10.1016/0300-5712(81)90057-9 ↗
2. 2) Von Fraunhofer JA, Sichina WJ. Characterization of the physical properties of resilient denture liners. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 120-128.
3. 3) McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1347-1352.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00253-8 ↗
4. 4) Jones DW, Sutow EJ, Hall GC, Tobin WM, Graham BS. Dental soft polymers: plasticizer composition and leachability. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 1-7.10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80080-0 ↗
5. 5) Ramakrishnaiah R, Abdullah al khureif AA, Gujjari A, Dhakshayini MR. A comparative study to evaluate the softness of heat processed and auto polymerized denture relining materials when stored in hard and soft water-An invite study. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012; 6: 74-78.10.5005/johcd-6-2-74 ↗
6. 6) Moore DJ, Glazer ZR, Tobacco MJ, Linebaugh MG. Evaluation of polymeric materials for maxillofacial prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 38: 319-324.10.1016/0022-3913(77)90309-2 ↗
7. 7) Farah JW, Robinson JC, Koran A, Craig RG, Hood JAA. Properties of a modified cross-linked silicone for maxillofacial prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 1987; 14: 599-605.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00756.x ↗
8. 8) Waters MGJ, Jagger RG, Winter RW. Effect of surface modified fillers on the water absorption of a (RTV) silicone denture soft lining material. J Dent 1996; 24: 297-300.10.1016/0300-5712(95)00066-6 ↗
9. 9) Waters MGJ, Jagger RG. Mechanical properties of an experimental denture soft lining material. J Dent 1999; 27: 197-202.10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00046-3 ↗
10. 10) Aziz T, Waters M, Jagger R. Development of a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) maxillofacial prosthetic material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003; 65: 252-261.10.1002/jbm.b.10559 ↗
11. 11) Santawisuk W, Kanchanavasita W, Sirisinha C, Harnirattisai C.Dynamic viscoelastic properties of experimental silicone soft lining materials. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 454-460.10.4012/dmj.2009-126 ↗
12. 12) Gunay Y, Kurtoglu C, Atay A, Karayazgan B, Gurbuz CC. Effect of tulle on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 775-779.10.4012/dmj.27.775 ↗
13. 13) Kanie T, Tomita K, Tokuda M, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of experimental soft lining materials based on urethane acrylate oligomers. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 501-506.10.4012/dmj.28.501 ↗
14. 14) International Organization for Standardization. ISO 37: Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic —Determination of tensile stress-strain properties. 4th ed. Geneva, 2005.
15. 15) International Organization for Standardization. ISO 34-1: Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic —Determination of tear strength— Part 1: Trouser, angle and crescent test pieces. 2nd ed. Geneva, 2004.
16. 16) American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D 2240: Standard test method for rubber property —Durometer hardness. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia; 2005.
17. 17) Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and surgical considerations. St. Louis: Ishiyaku Euro America, Inc.; 1996. p. 387-399.
18. 18) Andres CJ, Haug SP, Brown DT, Bernal G. Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part II —Report of survey. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 519-522.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90422-7 ↗
19. 19) Brunauer H, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 1938; 60: 309-319.10.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
20. 20) Aziz T, Waters M, Jagger R. Analysis of the properties of silicone rubber maxillofacial prosthetic materials. J Dent 2003; 31: 67-74.10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00084-2 ↗
21. 21) Wolfaardt JF, Chandler HD, Smith BA. Mechanical properties of a new facial prosthetic material. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 228-234.10.1016/0022-3913(85)90117-9 ↗
22. 22) Wachtel LW. Proceedings Symposium: Dental Biomaterials-Research Priorities. Illinois: Dhew Publication; 1973. p. 248-249.
23. 23) Canay S, Hersek N, Tulunoglu I, Uzun G. Evaluation of colour and hardness changes of soft lining materials in food colorant solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 821-829.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00477.x ↗
24. 24) Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: An introduction to materials in medicine. Academic Press; 2012. p. 88.
25. 25) International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10139- 2: Dentistry —Soft lining materials for removable dentures—Part 2: Materials for long-term use. 1th ed. Geneva, 1999.