Mechanical properties and water sorption of two experimental glass ionomer cements with hydroxyapatite or calcium fluorapatite formulation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study the mechanical behavior and water sorption (Ws) of experimental glass-ionomer-cements (GICs) with hydroxyapatite (HA) or calcium fluorapatite (CFA) prototype formulations were examined. Specimens from two experimental and one commercially available GIC were prepared in three protocols; (1) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, (2) with coating and (3) with heat application. The specimens were stored in distilled water or artificial saliva at 37°C for 7- and 30-days. Flexural strength (FS), Vickers hardness (VHN) and Ws of GICs were evaluated. Experimental GICs showed higher FS values than commercial GIC (p<0.001). Higher FS and VHN values were observed when GICs were prepared according to manufacturer’s recommendation. FS was affected only by GIC-type (η2=0.027), whereas VHN was affected by GIC-type (η2=0.331), treatment-protocols (η2=0.067), storage-medium (η2=0.100) and increased storage-duration (η2=0.317). The tested parameters did not significantly influence the Ws of all tested GICs (p>0.05). The GICs with HA or CFA formulations might represent a promising approach due to their FS, VHN and Ws characteristics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University
Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Hu J, Du X, Huang C, Fu D, Ouyang X, Wang Y. Antibacterial and physical properties of EGCG-containing glass ionomer cements. J Dent 2013; 41: 927-934.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.014 ↗
2. 2) Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997; 25: 459-473.10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00066-8 ↗
3. 3) Sasanaluckit P, Albustany KR, Doherty PJ, Williams DF. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 906-916.10.1016/0142-9612(93)90132-L ↗
4. 4) Nicholson JW, Croll TP. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 705-714.
5. 5) Sidhu SK. Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl 1): 23-30.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x ↗
6. 6) Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 45-50.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00067-8 ↗
7. 7) Silva RC, Zuanon AC, Esberard RR, Candido MS, Machado JS. In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 139-142.10.1007/s10856-006-0672-y ↗
8. 8) Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 36-45.
9. 9) Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent 2013; 41: 223-230.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.005 ↗
10. 10) Gavic L, Gorseta K, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Tadin A, Glavina D, van Duinen RN, Lynch E. Influence of thermo-light curing with dental light-curing units on the microhardness of glass-ionomer cements. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36: 425-430.10.11607/prd.2405 ↗
11. 11) Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 643-650.10.1007/s00784-013-1005-4 ↗
12. 12) Xie D, Chung ID, Wu W, Lemons J, Puckett A, Mays J. An amino acid-modified and non-HEMA containing glass-ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1825-1830.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.033 ↗
13. 13) Dowling AH, Stamboulis A, Fleming GJ. The influence of montmorillonite clay reinforcement on the performance of a glass ionomer restorative. J Dent 2006; 34: 802-810.10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.005 ↗
14. 14) Iz SG, Ertugrul F, Eden E, Gurhan SI. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements with and without chlorhexidine. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 89-93.10.4103/1305-7456.119083 ↗
15. 15) Baig MS, Fleming GJ. Conventional glass-ionomer materials: A review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. J Dent 2015; 43: 897-912.10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.004 ↗
16. 16) Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC). Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 432-440.10.1016/j.actbio.2007.07.011 ↗
17. 17) Goenka S, Balu R, Sampath Kumar TS. Effects of nanocrystalline calcium deficient hydroxyapatite incorporation in glass ionomer cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012; 7: 69-76.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.002 ↗
18. 18) Arita K, Lucas ME, Nishino M. The effect of adding hydroxyapatite on the flexural strength of glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 126-136.10.4012/dmj.22.126 ↗
19. 19) Chiu SY, Shinonaga Y, Abe Y, Harada K, Arita K. Influence of porous spherical-shaped hydroxyapatite on mechanical strength and bioactive function of conventional glass ionomer cement. Materials (Basel) 2017; 10: pii: E27.10.3390/ma10010027 ↗
20. 20) Pepla E, Besharat LK, Palaia G, Tenore G, Migliau G. Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2014; 5: 108-114.10.11138/ads/2014.5.3.108 ↗
21. 21) Yap AU, Pek YS, Kumar RA, Cheang P, Khor KA. Experimental studies on a new bioactive material: HAIonomer cements. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 955-962.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00208-3 ↗
22. 22) Arita K, Yamamoto A, Shinonaga Y, Harada K, Abe Y, Nakagawa K, Sugiyama S. Hydroxyapatite particle characteristics influence the enhancement of the mechanical and chemical properties of conventional restorative glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 672-683.10.4012/dmj.2011-029 ↗
23. 23) Lin J, Zhu J, Gu X, Wen W, Li Q, Fischer-Brandies H, Wang H, Mehl C. Effects of incorporation of nano-fluorapatite or nano-fluorohydroxyapatite on a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 1346-1353.10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.029 ↗
24. 24) Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent 2001; 29: 205-210.10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00010-0 ↗
25. 25) Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 972-978.10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.001 ↗
26. 26) Fleming GJ, Zala DM. An assessment of encapsulated versus hand-mixed glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 168-177.
27. 27) Frechoso SC, Menendez M, Guisasola C, Arregui I, Tejerina JM, Sicilia A. Evaluation of the efficacy of two potassium nitrate bioadhesive gels (5% and 10%) in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. A randomised clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 315-320.10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.20077.x ↗
28. 28) Jose P, Sanjeev K, Sekar M. Effect of green and white tea pretreatment on remineralization of demineralized dentin by CPP-ACFP-an invitro microhardness analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: ZC85-89.10.7860/JCDR/2016/16038.7674 ↗
29. 29) Rodrigues Jr SA, Zanchi CH, Carvalho RV, Demarco FF. Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites. Braz Oral Res 2007; 21: 16-21.10.1590/S1806-83242007000100003 ↗
30. 30) Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, Rueggeberg FA, Foulger S, Saito T, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6449-6459.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052 ↗
31. 31) Yamamoto Y. Study on hydroxyapatite-polyacrylic acid composite cement (hydroxyapatite-glass ionomer cement). Shika Zairyo Kikai 1984; 3: 787-796.
32. 32) Gu YW, Yap AU, Cheang P, Khor KA. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO(2) into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials 2005; 26: 713-720.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.019 ↗
33. 33) Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent 2009; 37: 133-140.10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.006 ↗
34. 34) Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM. Early strength of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 57-62.10.1016/0109-5641(93)90107-2 ↗
35. 35) Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Wilson AD. Glass-ionomer cements of improved flexural strength. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 146-148.10.1177/00220345860650021101 ↗
36. 36) Nicholson JW, Hawkins SJ, Smith JE. The incorporation of hydroxyapatite into glass-polyalkenoate (“glass-ionomer”) cements: a preliminary study. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993; 4: 418-421.10.1007/BF00122202 ↗
37. 37) Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3787-3794.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00260-6 ↗
38. 38) Woolford MJ. Effect of radiant heat on the surface hardness of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement. J Dent 1994; 22: 360-363.10.1016/0300-5712(94)90089-2 ↗
39. 39) Dehurtevent M, Deveaux E, Hornez JC, Robberecht L, Tabary N, Chai F. Influence of heat and ultrasonic treatments on the setting and maturation of a glass-ionomer cement. Am J Dent 2015; 28: 105-110.
40. 40) Chay PL. Development of HA-GIC composites, Honors Year Project, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2000.
41. 41) Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The effect of saliva on surface hardness and water sorption of glass-ionomers and “compomers”. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 869-873.10.1023/A:1025630609544 ↗
42. 42) Hadi MR, Rahmatallah SS, Al-Ameer SS. Water sorption of newly formulated resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer cements. J Bagh College Dent 2010; 22: 28-31.
43. 43) Sidhu SK, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Crack closure on rehydration of glass-ionomer materials. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 465-469.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00155.x ↗
44. 44) Earl MS, Mount GJ, Hume WR. The effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glass ionomer cement surface II. Aust Dent J 1989; 34: 326-329.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb04641.x ↗
45. 45) Ribeiro AP, Serra MC, Paulillo LA, Rodrigues Jr AL. Effectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 427-431.
46. 46) Lohbauer U, Kramer N, Siedschlag G, Schubert EW, Lauerer B, Muller FA, Petschelt A, Ebert J. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating. Am J Dent 2011; 24: 124-128.
47. 47) Bonifacio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70: 471-477.10.3109/00016357.2011.639307 ↗
48. 48) Miyazaki M, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of surface coatings on flexural properties of glass ionomers. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 600-604.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00148.x ↗
49. 49) Hankins AD, Hatch RH, Benson JH, Blen BJ, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 363-370.10.14219/jada.2043.3 ↗
50. 50) Zoergiebel J, Ilie N. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 619-626.10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1 ↗
51. 51) Fabian Molina G, Cabral RJ, Mazzola I, Brain Lascano L, Frencken JE. Biaxial flexural strength of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements heat-cured with an LED lamp during setting. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 838460.10.1155/2013/838460 ↗
52. 52) Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 34-39.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00053-1 ↗
53. 53) Ellakuria J, Triana R, Minguez N, Soler I, Ibaseta G, Maza J, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 286-290.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00042-8 ↗