Perceptual Evaluations of Plant-Dyed and Industrial-Dyed Cotton Fabrics Based on Kansei Engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explored the perceptual cognition of differently dyed fabrics among consumers and compared perceptual evaluations of dyed fabrics made of various materials using basic theoretical knowledge of Kansei engineering and clothing materials. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis of the survey data of 100 college students to determine the characteristics of dyed cotton fabric. The results of the perceptual evaluations of plant-dyed and industrial-dyed fabrics are discussed. The most representative characteristics of cotton fabrics, core evaluation vocabulary, and perceptual evaluation factors of plant-dyed and industrial-dyed cotton fabrics were determined by the semantic difference method and cluster analysis. The relationship between the perceptual image word pairs (i.e. vision, touch, smell, health, and value) and each type of dyed fabrics was studied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Color Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China
University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
Funding
Foreign Cooperation Projects of Fujian Science and Technology · Ecological Dyed Method and Technology of Warp Knitted Underwear Fabric · Fujian College Education Reform Research · Virtual Simulation Experiment Teaching Project of Minjiang University
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-410.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-4 ↗
2. 10.1080/0014013031000161092810.1080/00140130310001610928 ↗
3. 10.1002/hfm.1005110.1002/hfm.10051 ↗
4. Schütte S. Engineering emotional values in product design– Kansei engineering in development. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, 2005.
5. 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.06.00410.1016/j.ergon.2005.06.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.aei.2008.10.00110.1016/j.aei.2008.10.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.10.00210.1016/j.ergon.2010.10.002 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751771209210.1177/0040517517712092 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.05.00110.1016/j.ergon.2005.05.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.01210.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.displa.2010.12.00110.1016/j.displa.2010.12.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.03.00510.1016/j.ergon.2012.03.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.00110.1016/j.aei.2015.11.001 ↗
14. 10.1080/146392202100004998010.1080/1463922021000049980 ↗
15. 10.5057/kei.6.3_1910.5057/kei.6.3_19 ↗
16. Meyer C · Harv Bus Rev · 2007 · 85 · 117
17. 10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.02310.1016/j.ins.2008.06.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.01110.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.011 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10479-010-0826-710.1007/s10479-010-0826-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.03510.1016/j.ins.2010.01.035 ↗
21. Ting H · Text Res J · 2012 · 33 · 140
22. 10.1177/004051751558616410.1177/0040517515586164 ↗
23. Xiaoxi Z · Text Res J · 2015 · 36 · 100
24. Shaoying H · J Silk · 2016 · 53 · 35
25. Yan G. Computer aided product design. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2004, pp. 47–52.
26. Cagan J, Vogel CM. Creating breakthrough products: innovation from product planning to program approval. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002, pp. 1–3.
27. Wei Y. · J Minjiang Univ · 2015 · 147 · 111
28. Haiquan Z · Text Res J · 2003 · 24 · 34
29. Dehuan L. Market research. Beijing, China: Economic Management Press, 2000, p. 158.
30. 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00026-810.1016/S0169-8141(99)00026-8 ↗
31. Bingjie G · J Xi’an Polytech Univ · 2017 · 31 · 338
32. 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.09.03710.1016/j.knosys.2017.09.037 ↗
33. Xiaox Z · Text Res J · 2016 · 37 · 59
34. Kejing L · Ecol Econ · 2009 · 10 · 194
35. Maslow AH. Self-actualizing man. Shanghai, China: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1986, pp. 162–164.
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.00210.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.002 ↗
37. Ju S. Probability theory and mathematical statistics (Concise eedition). Beijing, China: Higher Education Press, 2010, p. 181.