The dynamic viscoelasticity and water absorption characteristics of soft acrylic resin materials containing adipates and a maleate plasticizer
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of different plasticizers in soft acrylic resin materials to reduce leaching of the plasticizer and thus increase the durability of tissue conditioners. Samples were prepared containing different combinations of three types of polymer/copolymer powder and four types of plasticizer liquid (DEHM, DIBA, DAA and DINA). The dynamic viscoelasticity of each sample was measured after water immersion using a dynamic mechanical analyzer. Water absorption, solubility and weight change were also measured. A significant difference was found among the materials regarding dynamic viscoelasticity, water absorption and solubility. The samples containing P-n-BMA had the most stable G' and G'' scores throughout the immersion. P-n-BMA is the most suitable powder together with DEHM as the most suitable liquid component for a tissue conditioner. These results suggest that it is possible to improve the durability of tissue conditioners by combining different polymers and plasticizers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Science and PVC · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90184-310.1016/0022-3913(71)90184-3 ↗
2. 2) Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthetic dentistry: A review. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 477-483.
3. 3) Wilson HJ, Tomlin HR, Osborne J. Tissue conditioners and functional impression materials. Br Dent J 1966; 121: 9-16.10.1177/003591576605901045 ↗
4. 10.1038/sj.bdj.480472610.1038/sj.bdj.4804726 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70215-X10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70215-X ↗
6. 6) Braden M. Tissue conditioners: I. Composition and structure. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 145-148.10.1177/00220345700490010901 ↗
7. 10.1016/0300-5712(81)90057-910.1016/0300-5712(81)90057-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90137-F10.1016/0300-5712(93)90137-F ↗
9. 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80080-010.1016/S0109-5641(88)80080-0 ↗
10. 10) Wilson J. In vitro loss of alcohol from tissue conditioners. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 17-21.
11. 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.00510.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.005 ↗
12. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12810110.1067/mpr.2002.128101 ↗
13. 13) vom Saal FS, Cooke PS, Buchanan DL, Palanza P, Thayer KA, Nagel SC, Parmigiani S, Welshons WV. A physiologically based approach to the study of bisphenol and other estrogenic chemicals on the size of reproductive organs, Daily sperm production and behavior. Toxicol Ind Health 1998; 14: 239-260.10.1177/074823379801400115 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00064-710.1016/S0109-5641(02)00064-7 ↗
15. 15) Cederberg I. Information from KEMI; Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate: Sundbyberg, Sweden, 2005. p13.
16. 16) Parker S, Braden M. Formulation of tissue conditioners. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 579-584.10.1016/0142-9612(90)90082-2 ↗
17. 17) Parker S, Braden M. Effect of composition on the gelation of tissue conditioners. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1827-1832.10.1016/0142-9612(95)00340-1 ↗
18. 18) Parker S, Martin D, Braden M. Soft acrylic resin materials containing a polymerisable plasticiser I: mechanical properties. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1695-1701.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00077-5 ↗
19. 19) Parker S, Martin D, Braden M. Soft acrylic resin materials containing a polymerisable plasticiser II: Water absorption characteristics. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 55-60.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00134-3 ↗
20. 10.4012/dmj.2009-13410.4012/dmj.2009-134 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70085-010.1016/S0022-3913(00)70085-0 ↗
22. 22) Parker S, Braden M. The effect of particle size on the gelation of tissue conditioners. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 2039-2042.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00391-4 ↗
23. 10.4012/dmj.23.9410.4012/dmj.23.94 ↗
24. 10.1177/15440591050840041610.1177/154405910508400416 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.01110.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011 ↗
26. 10.4012/dmj.27.15310.4012/dmj.27.153 ↗
27. 27) Pound E. Conditioning of denture patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64: 461-468.10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0123 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80059-510.1016/S0109-5641(96)80059-5 ↗
29. 29) Neill DJ, Nairn RI. Complete denture prosthetics. 2nd ed. Bristol, England: Wright; 1983. p.2-3.
30. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00279.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00279.x ↗
31. 10.1016/0032-3861(91)90085-W10.1016/0032-3861(91)90085-W ↗
32. 32) Graham BS, Jones DW, Sutow EJ. An in vivo and in vitro study of the loss of plasticizer from soft polymer-gel materials. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 870-873.10.1177/00220345910700050101 ↗
33. 33) Yiu CKY, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carriho MRO, Tay FR. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5789-5796.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.026 ↗
34. 34) Lodge AS. Elastic liquids. London: Academic Press; 1964. p.118-119.