Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns created by 3D printers
Source abstract
Abstract
Contrary to widespread incise CAD/CAM, little is known about the dental application of 3D printing, especially the possibility of using 3D printing with organic material. The resin patterns of a full crown model were created by four types of 3D printers, a thermofusion device (CX), a digital light processing stereo-lithograph device (B9), a laser stereo-lithograph device (DW) and a multi-jet modeling device (PJ). The dimensional accuracy of the outer and inner diameters and depths of the created model crowns, and the surface roughness of sidewall were investigated. The outer diameters were smaller than the designed value in most conditions. The inner diameters were smaller than the designed value in any enlargement ratio except B9. The depth of CX or B9 tended to become shallower, though that of PJ or DW tended to increase. The surface roughness along the tooth axis direction was greater than that perpendicular to the tooth axis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Nayar S, Bhuminathan S, Bhat WM. Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7: 216-219.10.4103/0975-7406.155913 ↗
2. 2) Lima JM, Anami LC, Araujo RM, Pavanelli CA. Removable partial dentures: use of rapid prototyping. J Prosthodont 2014; 23: 588-591.10.1111/jopr.12154 ↗
3. 3) Saleh WK, Ariffin E, Sherriff M, Bister D. Accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements of resin, plaster, digital and printed study-models. J Orthod 2015; DOI 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000016.10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000016 ↗
4. 4) Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 495-502.10.4012/dmj.2014-293 ↗
5. 5) Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shinozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 705-710.10.4012/dmj.2014-208 ↗
6. 6) Tomita S, Shin-ya A, Gomi H, Shin-ya A, Yokoyama D. Machining accuracy of crowns by CAD/CAM system using TCP/IP: influence of restorative material and scanning condition. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 549-560.10.4012/dmj.26.549 ↗
7. 7) Taira Y, Odatsu T. Sawase T. Effects of a fluoride etchant and a phosphate primer on bonding of veneering composite to Ti-6Al-4V alloy for CAD/CAM restorations. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57: 30-35.10.1016/j.jpor.2012.08.002 ↗
8. 8) Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 602-608.10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479 ↗
9. 9) Sedda M, Vichi A, Carrabba M, Capperucci A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Influence of coloring procedure on flexural resistance of zirconia blocks. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 98-102.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.001 ↗
10. 10) Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi A. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci 2013; 14: 118-129.
11. 11) Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci 2015; 16: 1-9.
12. 12) van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 3-12.10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 ↗
13. 13) Bae EJ, Kim HY, Kim WC, Kim JH. In vitro evaluation of the bond strength between various ceramics and cobalt chromium alloy fabricated by selective laser sintering. J Adv Prosthodont 2015; 7: 312-316.10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.312 ↗
14. 14) Sohmura T. The present condition of the dental scanner and 3D printer. J J Acad Digit Dent 2014; 4: 2-11.
15. 16) Chen Y H, Ng C T, Wang Y Z. Generation of an STL file from 3D measurement data with user-controlled data reduction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1999; 15: 127-131.10.1007/s001700050049 ↗
16. 17) Horvath J. Mastering 3D printing. New York: Apress (Springer); 2015. p. 51-52.10.1007/978-1-4842-0025-4 ↗
17. 18) Starosolski ZA, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD, Krishnamurthy R, Annapragada A. Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44: 216-221.10.1007/s00247-013-2788-9 ↗
18. 19) 3D Systems: CubeXTM Printer user guide. 2012. 44-46.
19. 20) Hotproceed: B9Creator Japanese manual. 2013. 34-35.
20. 21) Muita K, Westerlund M, Rajala R. The evolution of rapid production: How to adopt novel manufacturing technology. International Federation Automatic Control —Papers On Line 2015; 48:032-037.10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.054 ↗
21. 22) Galantucci L M, Bodi I, Kacani J, Lavecchia F. Analysis of dimensional performance for a 3D open-source printer based on fused deposition modeling technique. Procedia CIRP 2015; 28: 82-87.10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.014 ↗
22. 23) Miyasaka T. Dental models and crowns manufactured by 3D printer. J J Dent Mater 2014; 33: 281-284.