Influence of water immersion on the transmitted load of home reliners
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify how composition and water immersion of home reliners affect the attenuation of the transmitted load. To conduct a transmitted load measurement, we used three different home reliners (Tafugurippu Pink A, Liodent Pink, and Cushion Correct), which were combined acrylic resin disks. They were immersed in distilled water and then placed on a silicone quasi-mucosa (φ20×1.5 mm), which was set on a pressure sensor (φ8×0.35 mm), followed by the application of static load. Subsequently, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and gas chromatography (GC) were used to clarify the composition of each home reliner. The attenuation of the transmitted load began 3 h after immersion. Moreover, both GPC and GC revealed a difference in composition among the three products. Further, the difference in the vinyl acetate molecular weight distribution and ethyl alcohol content affected the attenuation of the transmitted load of home reliners after water absorption.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · melanin and skin pigmentation · Skin Protection and Aging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Gerontology and Gerodontology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Means CR. The home reliner materials: The significance of the problem. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14: 1086-1090.10.1016/0022-3913(64)90177-5 ↗
2. 2) Hirayama D, Sakai Y, Akiba N, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Effect of home reliner on occlusal relationships and oral mucosa: Viscoelastic analyses by smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation. Comput Biol Med 2015; 66: 20-28.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.07.023 ↗
3. 3) Nakamura T, Akiba H, Tanimoto H, Hirayama D, Minakuci S. Influence of a home reliner on denture displacement and patient-reported outcome. J Stomatol Soc Jpn 2017; 84: 8-18.10.5357/koubyou.84.1_8 ↗
4. 4) Uysal H, Altay OT, Alparslan N, Bilge A. Comparison of four different denture cushion adhesives —A subjective study. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 209-213.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00220.x ↗
5. 5) Koronis S, Pizatos E, Polyzois G, Lagouvardos P. Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers. Gerodontology 2012; 29: e161-e169.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x ↗
6. 6) Papadiochou S, Emmanouil I, Papadiochos I. Denture adhesives: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113: 391-397.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.001 ↗
7. 7) Udo-Yamakawa A, Kawai Y. Effects of home and office care denture reliners on maxillary complete dentures. Gerodontology 2010; 27: 141-146.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00308.x ↗
8. 8) Woelfel JB, Kreider JA. Home reliner ruins dentures and causes shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 319-325.10.1016/0022-3913(68)90226-6 ↗
9. 9) Lee TE. Warning: Home reliners cause bone resorption. Chronicle 1971; 34: 212-213.
10. 10) Tautin FS. Home reliners —where we have failed. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 19-20.10.1016/0022-3913(71)90146-6 ↗
11. 11) Tanimoto H, Akiba H, Nakamura T, Zhao H, Suzuki H, Uno A, Uo M, Minakuchi S. An objective estimation of the removability of three home reliners. Dent Mater J 2017; 36: 309-318.10.4012/dmj.2016-042 ↗
12. 12) Makihira S, Nikawa H, Satonobu SV, Jin C, Hamada T. Growth of Candida species on commercial denture adhesives in vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 48-52.
13. 13) Niekawa K. Relations between the composition and viscoelastic properties of temporary soft lining materials. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1986; 53: 157-183.10.5357/koubyou.53.157 ↗
14. 14) Murata H, Hong G, Yamakado C, Kurogi T, Kano H, Hamada T. Dynamic viscoelastic properties, water absorption, and solubility of home reliners. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 554-561.10.4012/dmj.2010-012 ↗
15. 15) Takahashi F, Koji T, Morita O. Surface texture of home reliners after imbibition and volatilization. Prosthodont Res Pract 2002; 1: 41-49.10.2186/prp.1.41 ↗
16. 16) Tamura F, Suzuki S, Mukai Y. An evaluation of the viscoelastic characteristics of soft denture liners. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 270-277.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00270.x ↗
17. 17) Kawano F, Kon M, Koran A, Matsumoto N. Shock-absorbing behavior of four processed soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 599-605.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90292-5 ↗
18. 18) Fujii K, Arikawa H, Kanie T, Terao T, Tsuruda H, Itonaga A, Kadokawa A, Hamano T, Inoue K. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of denture base soft lining materials in vibrating reed method. Shika Zairyo Kikai 1993; 12: 117-122.
19. 19) Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelastic properties and the age changes of long-term soft denture liners. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1421-1427.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00010-7 ↗
20. 20) Taguchi N, Murata H, Hamada T, Hong G. Effect of viscoelastic properties of resilient denture liners on pressures under dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1003-1008.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00770.x ↗
21. 21) Sakuma Y. An experimental study on the pressure distribution against the tissue supporting mandibular complete denture. Tsurumi shigaku (Tsurumi University Dent J) 1988; 14: 47-110.
22. 22) Terakura T. The thickness of the oral soft tissue. Usefulness in diagnosis for complete dentures. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1988; 32: 546-560.10.2186/jjps.32.546 ↗
23. 23) Nagano K, Kawno F, Ichikawa T. Selection of occlusal scheme on the basis of pressure distribution on supporting structures under complete dentures. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2004; 48: 673-680.10.2186/jjps.48.673 ↗
24. 24) Goto T, Nagao K, Ishida Y, Tomotake Y, Ichikawa T. Influence of matrix attachment installation load on movement and resultant forces in implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 2015; 24: 156-163.10.1111/jopr.12177 ↗