journal article·2007Open access

Mechanical Properties of Light-curing Composites Polymerized with Different Laboratory Photo-curing Units

Gisele Rodrigues da SILVA, Paulo Cézar SIMAMOTO-JÚNIOR, Adérito Soares DA MOTA, Carlos José SOARES

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 26· Issue 2

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the microhardness (KHN) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) of two hybrid resin composites (TPH Spectrum and Filtek Z250). To this end, the composites were polymerized with six laboratory photo-curing units (LPUs) and the results compared with an alternative polymerization method using conventional halogen light source in conjunction with additional polymerization in an autoclave (15 minutes/100 degrees C). LPUs were used following the manufacturers' instructions. Diametral tensile strength and Knoop hardness tests were conducted for all groups (n=5). Data were statistically compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). Among the LPUs, the one that provided light curing in conjunction with heat and nitrogen pressure resulted in a significant increase in KHN and DTS of resin composites. Between the resin composites, Filtek Z250 showed higher hardness values than TPH Spectrum. It was concluded that the use of alternative polymerization with conventional light polymerization and autoclave was feasible with a wide implication for the general public in terms of reduced dental treatment cost.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, M · Oper Dent · 2000 · 25 · 26
2. Price RB, Dérand T, Lone · Am J Dent · 2002 · 15 · 47
3. 3) Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed, Santos Publishing, Brazil, 2004, pp.185-198.
4. Emami N, Soderholm KJ · Dent Mater · 2005 · 21 · 97710.1016/j.dental.2005.02.016 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x ↗
6. Ekfeldt A, Oilo G · Acta Odontol Scand · 1988 · 46 · 15910.3109/00016358809004762 ↗
7. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL · Dent Mater · 2004 · 20 · 53010.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001 ↗
8. Matsumura H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M · J Oral Rehabil · 1999 · 26 · 69810.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00445.x ↗
9. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00014-210.1016/S0300-5712(00)00014-2 ↗
10. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01142.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01142.x ↗
11. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00241.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00241.x ↗
12. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Mar · Oper Dent · 2005 · 30 · 389
13. Khan AM, Satou N, Shintani H, Taira · J Oral Rehabil · 1993 · 20 · 60510.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01647.x ↗
14. Park SH, Lee CS · Oper Dent · 1996 · 21 · 213
15. Cobb DS, Vargas MA, Rundle T · Am J Dent · 1996 · 9 · 199
16. Xu HHK, Smith DT, Schumacher GE, Ei · Dent Mater · 2000 · 16 · 24810.1016/S0109-5641(00)00014-2 ↗
17. Brosh T, Baharav H, Gross O, Laufer · J Prosthet Dent · 1997 · 77 · 57310.1016/S0022-3913(97)70097-0 ↗
18. Santerre JP, Shajii L, Tsang H · J Dent Res · 1999 · 78 · 145910.1177/00220345990780081201 ↗
19. RUEGGEBERG F A · Dent Mater · 1997 · 13 · 36010.1016/S0109-5641(97)80107-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-910.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-9 ↗
21. Wilson MA, Norman RD · J Dent · 1991 · 19 · 29610.1016/0300-5712(91)90077-C ↗
22. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00021-X10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00021-X ↗
23. Martos J, Osinaga PWR, Oliveira E, · Mater Res · 2003 · 6 · 59910.1590/S1516-14392003000400029 ↗
24. Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Wak · Oper Dent · 2001 · 26 · 585