journal article·2001-11

Dynamic elastic modulus of ‘packable’ composites

Y Abe, P Lambrechts, S Inoue, M.J.A Braem, M Takeuchi, G Vanherle, B Van Meerbeek

Dental Materials· Volume 17· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Objective A new type of so-called 'packable', 'condensable' or 'mouldable' composite has been developed and aims at replacing amalgam for posterior restorations. The purpose of the present investigation was to study the dynamic elastic modulus of 12 packable composites, and to follow the evolution of this property following prolonged water absorption. Methods Of each material ten rectangular samples (1.5x5x35 mm) were prepared. The elastic modulus (GPa) of each sample was determined with a non-destructive dynamic method using a Grindo-Sonic after 24 h of dry storage at room temperature, and after 24h, 1, 3 and 6 months of wet storage at 37 degrees C. All data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni/Dunn's test for multiple comparisons and paired t-test with a significance level of p<0.05. In addition, inorganic filler volume percentages were derived from the phenomenological model introduced by Braem et al. [11]. Results The studied materials varied widely in terms of elastic modulus, ranging between composites classified as Compact-Filled Densified (elastic modulus of 23.4+/-2.4 GPa) and as Microfine (elastic modulus of 8.5+/-2.1 GPa). Significance The great diversity observed in the elastic modulus of this type of composites necessitates clear specifications with regard to 'first' the definition of marketing terms such as packable and so on, and 'second' the justified use in posterior teeth.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Interproximal contacts of packable composites
2. Depths of cure of packable composite—Three method comparison
3. Comparative depth of cure using two factors: Composite system and curing time
4. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of condensable composites
5. Physical properties of condensable versus conventional composites
6. Physical properties of high density composite restorative materials
7. Wear behavior of flowable and condensable composite resins
8. In-vitro wear assessment of high density composite resins
9. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00405.x ↗
10. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response10.1177/00220345860650050301 ↗
11. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites10.1016/0109-5641(89)90128-0 ↗
12. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives
13. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M ↗
14. Determination of Young's modulus of dental composites: a phenomenological model10.1007/BF01132936 ↗
15. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials10.1177/00220345970760041001 ↗
16. Influence of water exposure on the tensile strength of composites10.1177/00220345900690120501 ↗
17. In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composites10.1002/jbm.820281203 ↗
18. New direct restorative materials10.1111/j.1875-595X.1998.tb00688.x ↗
19. Fluoride calcium and hydroxide release from the smart restorative material Ariston pHc
20. Margin analysis of two different resin composite systems after six months
21. Setting stress of light-cured packable composite resins
22. Restoration of extended Class I cavities lined with flowable resins
23. Microleakage control in Class II resin restoration, ‘in vitro’ study
24. Microleakage of a condensable composite: an in vitro investigations
25. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite
26. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations with and without flowable liners