journal article·2012-06

Influence of veneer application on fracture behavior of lithium-disilicate-based ceramic crowns

Ke Zhao, Yu Pan, Petra C. Guess, Xin-Ping Zhang, Michael V. Swain

Dental Materials· Volume 28· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Objectives To assess the influence of veneer application on fracture behavior, namely failure load and failure mode, of standardized lithium-disilicate-based crowns. Methods Forty molar crowns (IPS e.max Press, IvoclarVivadent) were fabricated in full anatomic (without veneer, 1.5-2.0mm at occlusal surface) and bi-layer (the occlusal surface is 0.7 mm of veneer and 0.8-1.3mm core) contour representing two groups. Crown specimens were seated and adhered on composite resin dies. All specimens were loaded with a 6mm diameter steatite sphere over the central fissure to failure. Failure modes and fractographic patterns were analyzed by optical stereo and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Fracture loads of the two groups were compared by the t-test, while the failure modes were analyzed by Pearson Chi-square test. Results There was a statistically significant difference in mean fracture load values (N±S.D.) between full anatomic [(2665.4±759.2)N] and veneered crowns [(1431.1±404.3)N] (p<0.001) and also in failure modes (χ(2)=6.465, p=0.011). Full anatomic crowns mainly showed bulk fracture, whereas veneered specimens predominately showed cohesive veneer and ceramic interface failure (75%); solely cohesive veneer failure (20%); and bulk fracture (5%). Significance Within the limitations of this study, veneer application resulted in significant lower fracture load values compared to full anatomic crowns. Fracture initiated from occlusal fissures near the load application site. A combination of cohesive veneer and ceramic interface failure represents the main failure mode of lithium-disilicate-based bi-layered crowns, whereas full anatomic crowns failed mainly from ceramic bulk fracture at the occlusal fissures.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue
2. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003 ↗
3. Perspectives on strength10.1016/0109-5641(95)80043-3 ↗
4. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique: a 2-year clinical study10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x ↗
5. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 ↗
6. Lifetime of alumina- and zirconia ceramics used for crown and bridge restorations10.1002/jbm.b.30599 ↗
7. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow up
8. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia–ceramic and metal–ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up
9. Retrospective survival analysis of 261 lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice
10. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations10.1016/0022-3913(84)90217-8 ↗
11. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics10.3109/00016359109041138 ↗
12. Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.001 ↗
13. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00551.x ↗
14. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all ceramic restorations. Part II. Zirconia veneering ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014 ↗
15. Shear strength of core–veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009 ↗
16. Fracture surface analysis of clinically failed fixed partial dentures10.1177/154405910608500314 ↗
17. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2006.05.004 ↗
18. Partial coverage restoration systems on molars – comparison of failure load after exposure to a mastication simulator10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01529.x ↗
19. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.019 ↗
20. A new method to test the fracture probability of all-ceramic crowns with a dual-axis chewing simulator10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.004 ↗
21. Role of substrate material in failure of crown-like layer structures10.1002/jbm.b.30666 ↗
22. Influence of occlusal geometry on ceramic crown fracture; role of cusp angle and fissure radius10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.014 ↗
23. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential10.1016/0022-3913(90)90168-C ↗
24. Fracture strength and fatigue resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns manufactured with CAD/CAM technology10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00305.x ↗
25. Survival rates of IPS empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5-year prospective clinical study
26. Fractographic analyses of three ceramic whole crown restoration failures10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.006 ↗
27. Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process
28. Fracture strength of two oxide ceramic crown systems after cyclic pre-loading and thermocycling10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01604.x ↗