Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strengths of cast Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys and the laser-sintered Co-Cr alloy to dental porcelain. Methods Dental porcelain was applied on two cast and one laser-sintered base metal alloy. Ten specimens were prepared for each group for bond strength comparison. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD multiple comparison test (alpha=0.05) was used for statistical analysis. Fractured specimens were observed with a stereomicroscope to classify the type of failure after shear bond testing. Results While the mean shear bond strength was highest for the cast Ni-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (81.6+/-14.6 MPa), the bond strength was not significantly different (P>0.05) from that for the cast Co-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (72.9+/-14.3 MPa) and the laser-sintered Co-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (67.0+/-14.9 MPa). All metal-ceramic specimens prepared from cast Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys exhibit a mixed mode of cohesive and adhesive failure, whereas five of the metal-ceramic specimens prepared from the laser-sintered Co-Cr alloy exhibited the mixed failure mode and five specimens exhibited adhesive failure in the porcelain. Conclusions The new laser-sintering technique for Co-Cr alloy appears promising for dental applications, but additional studies of properties of the laser-sintered alloy and fit of castings prepared by this new technique are needed before its acceptance into dental laboratory practice. Significance Laser sintering of Co-Cr alloy seems to be an alternative technique to conventional casting of dental alloys for porcelain fused to metal restorations.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Anusavice · 2003
2. Rosenstiel · 2006
3. Selective laser sintering of steel powders to obtain products based on SAPR-models10.1007/BF02466080 ↗
4. Direct selective laser sintering of hard metal powders: experimental study and simulation10.1007/s001700200024 ↗
5. Product information: PM100 Dental, PHENIX™ SYSTEMS http://www.phenix-systems.com [accessed at 08.10.2007].
6. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0408 ↗
7. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw
8. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003239.x ↗
9. Product information: Sirona Dental Systems, CEREC® http://www.cereconline.com [accessed at 08.10.2007]
10. Product information: Procera®, Nobel Biocare http://www.nobelbiocare.com [accessed at 08.10.2007].
11. Influence of investment type and sprue number on the casting accuracy of titanium crown margins.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.004 ↗
12. Metal ceramic compatibility: a review of the literature10.1016/0022-3913(90)90259-F ↗
13. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.017 ↗
14. Evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of two porcelains and pure titanium injected into the casting mold at three different temperatures10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.033 ↗
15. Bond strength porcelain on cast vs. wrought titanium
16. Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00083.x ↗
17. Strength of porcelain fused to titanium beams10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90250-4 ↗
18. O’Brien · 2002
19. Laser deposition: a new technology for fabrication of titanium restorations