Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the flexural strength (FS), compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), Knoop hardness (KHN) and wear resistance of ten commercial glass-ionomer cements (GICs). The fracture surfaces of these cements were examined using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) techniques to ascertain relationships between the mechanical properties and microstructures of these cements. Methods Specimens were fabricated according to the instructions from each manufacturer. The FS, CS, DTS, KHN and wear rate were measured after conditioning the specimens for 7 d in distilled water at 37 degrees C. One-way analysis of variance with the post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple range test was used to determine which specimen groups were significantly different for each test. The fracture surface of one representative specimen of each GIC from the FS tests was examined using a scanning electron microscope. Results The resin-modified GICs (RM GICs) exhibited much higher FS and DTS, not generally higher CS, often lower Knoop hardness and generally lower wear resistance, compared to the conventional GICs (C GICs). Vitremer (3M) had the highest values of FS and DTS; Fuji II LC (GC International) and Ketac-Molar (ESPE) had the highest CS; Ketac-Fil (ESPE) had the highest KHN. Ketac-Bond (ESPE) had the lowest FS; alpha-Silver (DMG-Hamburg) had the lowest CS. Four GICs (alpha-Fil (DMG-Hamburg), alpha-Silver, Ketac-Bond and Fuji II) had the lowest values of DTS, which were not significantly different from each other; alpha-Silver and Ketac-Silver had the lowest values of KHN. The highest wear resistance was exhibited by alpha-Silver and Ketac-Fil; F2LC had the lowest wear resistance. The C GICs exhibited brittle behavior, whereas the RM GICs underwent substantial plastic deformation in compression. The more integrated the microstructure, the higher were the FS and DTS. Higher CS was correlated with smaller glass particles, and higher KHN was found where there was a combination of smaller glass particles and lower porosity. Larger glass particle sizes and a more integrated microstructure contributed to a higher wear resistance. Significance The mechanical properties of GICs were closely related to their microstructures. Factors such as the integrity of the interface between the glass particles and the polymer matrix, the particle size, and the number and size of voids have important roles in determining the mechanical properties.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Developments in glass-ionomer cements
2. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements
3. The clinical use of glass-ionomer cements10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01824-9 ↗
4. Why is glass ionomer cement so popular?10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0156 ↗
5. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry
6. Glass-ionomer cement formulations. II. The synthesis of novel polycarboxylic acids10.1177/00220345800590060801 ↗
7. Development and use of water-hardening glass-ionomer luting cements10.1016/0022-3913(84)90091-X ↗
8. J.M. Antonucci, J.E. McKinney, J.W. Stansbury. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, US Patent Application no. 160856, 1988.10.1177/00220345880670050701 ↗
9. S. Akahane, S. Tosaki, Y. Kusayanagi, S. Kusakai, K. Hirota, K. Tomioka. Dental glass ionomer-cement compositions, US Patent no. 5063257, 1991.
10. S.B. Mitra. Photocurable ionomer-cement systems, US Patent no. 5130347, 1992.
11. New glass-ionomer polymers containing N-acryloyl-6-aminocaproic acid
12. Preparation of glass-ionomer cement using N-acryloyl-substituted amino acid monomers—evaluation of physical properties10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80063-7 ↗
13. Anusavice · 1996 · ed. 10 · 541
14. 1997 · ed. 10 · 272
15. Fracture properties of composite and glass ionomer dental restorative materials10.1002/jbm.820190705 ↗
16. Wear and microhardness of glass-ionomer cements10.1177/00220345870660060801 ↗
17. Characterization of glass ionomer filling materials10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80005-8 ↗
18. The influence of poly(acrylic acid) molecular weight on the fracture toughness of glass-ionomer cements10.1007/BF00660982 ↗
19. Fatigue and wear of dental materials10.1016/0300-5712(90)90114-T ↗
20. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements10.1016/0109-5641(91)90024-S ↗
21. The creep behavior of glass-ionomer restorative materials10.1016/0109-5641(91)90025-T ↗
22. Early strength of glass ionomer cements10.1016/0109-5641(93)90107-2 ↗
23. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water10.1016/0109-5641(94)90020-5 ↗
24. Flexural properties of resin-modified “hybrid” glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glass-ionomers10.4012/dmj.14.109 ↗
25. Mechanical properties of glass ionomers under static and dynamic loading10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80061-3 ↗
26. Wilson · 1988 · 57
27. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature10.1016/0022-3913(90)90209-U ↗
28. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80077-5 ↗
29. Sawyer · 1987 · 212
30. Analysis of glass ionomer cement with use of scanning electron microscopy10.1016/0022-3913(90)90173-A ↗
31. In vivo evaluation of occlusal wear of two experimental composites versus amalgam10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00603.x ↗
32. Surface deterioration of glass-ionomer cement during acid etching: an SEM evaluation
33. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing
34. Fracture toughness and fractography of dental cements, lining, build up, and filling materials
35. Wear and microhardness of a silver-sintered glass-ionomer cement10.1177/00220345880670050701 ↗
36. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating
37. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro10.1177/00220345910700031301 ↗
38. Effect of filler parameters on wear resistance of experimental composites
39. Glass-ionomer cements of improved flexural strength10.1177/00220345860650021101 ↗
40. Strength and setting behavior of resin-modified glass ionomer cements10.3109/00016359509005993 ↗
41. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 2. Effect of the powder:liquid ratio on the physical properties10.1016/S0300-5712(76)80008-5 ↗
42. Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass-ionomer cement used in dental practice10.1038/sj.bdj.4807311 ↗
43. The effect of glaze on restorative glass-ionomer cements10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01564.x ↗
44. Increase in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative materials with respect to time: a guide to their suitability for use in posterior primary dentition10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01368.x ↗
45. Long-term flexural strength of glass-ionomer cements10.1016/0142-9612(91)90113-O ↗
46. Finished surface texture, abrasion resistance, and porosity of Aspa glass-ionomer cement10.1016/0022-3913(78)90091-4 ↗
47. Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear
48. Clinical relevance of physical, chemical, and bonding properties of composite resins
49. Dual-cure luting composites. Part I. filler particle distribution10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01597.x ↗
50. In vivo changes in roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer materials10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80028-0 ↗