The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective The loss of the dental coronal portion following carious lesions or fractures leads to endodontic treatment with subsequent restoration to ensure correct anatomy and function. Recently, partial adhesive restorations have been widely proposed to increase the survival rate of endodontically treated teeth. The primary purpose of this review is to assess the failure rate of indirect partial adhesive restorations on endodontically treated teeth (ETT), considering the follow-up period. Methods The indications reported in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) were used to draft the present review. The study was constructed on PICO questions: population (patients who need indirect adhesive restorative treatment on endodontically treated teeth with onlay and overlay), intervention (onlay and overlay), control (patients with onlay and overlay on endodontically treated teeth) and outcome (failure rate and types of failure for onlay and overlay). The asked scientific question was: what are the failure rate and types of failure for adhesive indirect partial restorations on ETT? Results The overall failure rate that emerges is 0.087 with a ratio of 121/1254, I2 80 % p-value< 0.001. Moreover, by meta-regression with covariates the follow-up period reports a coefficient of 0.013 with a P-value< 0.001. In conclusion, the indirect partial restorations on endodontically treated teeth displayed overall acceptable outcomes in terms of success from 2 to 4 years after their placement with only 4.32 % of failure. Failures increase after 7 years up to 12-30 years with failure rates of approximatively 10.65 % and 20.94 %. The analysis of the included articles reporting the causes of restorations failures showed that 15.51 % of cases were related to the loss of dental element. Significance Besides the survival rates of indirect adhesive restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth, it was highlighted that the majority of failures appeared restorable. Thus, partial restorations seemed able to prevent the ETT tooth loss.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103227 ↗
2. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth10.1016/S0011-8532(22)03175-5 ↗
3. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3 ↗
4. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth10.1067/mpr.2002.122014 ↗
5. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.001 ↗
6. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth10.1067/mpr.2002.124094 ↗
7. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.198 ↗
8. Effects of fiber-glass-reinforced composite restorations on fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated molars10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.001 ↗
9. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.160 ↗
10. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: the influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.011 ↗
11. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009 ↗
12. Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: a retrospective clinical study10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.006 ↗
13. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years
14. Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: A retrospective clinical study10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.006 ↗
15. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years
16. The survival of indirect composite resin onlays for the restoration of root filled teeth: a retrospective medium-term study10.1111/iej.12242 ↗
17. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0022034516652848 ↗
18. Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/jerd.12555 ↗
19. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: a systematic review and analysis of studies10.1111/joor.12695 ↗
20. Longevity of ceramic onlays: a systematic review10.1111/jerd.12384 ↗
21. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 ↗
22. Systematic review of population-based epidemiological studies of oro-facial pain10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00041-0 ↗
23. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions10.1136/jech.52.6.377 ↗
24. The pocket guide to critical appraisal: a handbook for health care professionals
25. Sterilisation in dentistry: a review of the literature10.1155/2019/6507286 ↗
26. Microbial association with genus actinomyces in primary and secondary endodontic lesions, review10.3390/antibiotics9080433 ↗
27. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.008 ↗
28. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.026 ↗
29. Survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS empress after a 10-year observation period and in relation to various treatment parameters10.2341/07-13 ↗
30. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth
31. A practice-based study on the survival of restored endodontically treated teeth10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.028 ↗
32. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth10.1007/s00784-011-0642-8 ↗
33. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry
34. Posterior partial crowns out of lithium disilicate (LS2) with or without posts: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial with a 3-year follow up10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.004 ↗
35. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.022 ↗
36. IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation
37. Influence of different marginal forms on endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with lithium disilicate glass-ceramic onlays: two-year follow-up10.11607/ijp.6356 ↗
38. The efficacy of glass-ceramic onlays in the restoration of morphologically compromised and endodontically treated molars10.11607/ijp.2768 ↗
39. Considerations for altering preparation designs of porcelain inlay/onlay restorations for non-vital teeth10.1111/jopr.12279 ↗
40. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study
41. Prognosis of indirect composite resin cuspal coverage on endodontically treated premolars and molars: an in vivo prospective study10.1111/jopr.12545 ↗
42. Endocrown: a retrospective patient series study, in a 8 to 19-year period
43. Higgins J. , Thomas J. , Chandler J. , Cumpston M. , Li T. , Page MJ , et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Second Edition. 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. DOI:10.1002/9781119536604.10.1002/9781119536604 ↗
44. The outcome of endodontic treatment: a retrospective study of 2000 cases performed by a specialist10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.018 ↗
45. Influence of endodontic treatment and coronal restoration on status of periapical tissues: a cone-beam computed tomographic study10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.008 ↗