Interfacial toughness of bilayer dental ceramics based on a short-bar, chevron-notch test
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to test the null hypothesis that the interfacial toughness of each of two types of bonded core-veneer bilayer ceramics is not significantly different from the apparent fracture toughness of the control monolithic glass veneer. Methods T-shaped short-bars of a lithia-disilicate glass-ceramic core (LC) and yttria-stabilized polycrystalline zirconia core ceramic (ZC) were prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations. V-shaped notches were prepared by using 25-mum-thick palladium foil, leaving the chevron-notch area exposed, and the bars were veneered with a thermally compatible glass veneer (LC/GV and ZC/GV). Additionally, we also bonded the glass veneer to itself as a control group (GV/GV). Specimens were kept in distilled water for 30 days before testing in tension. Eight glass veneer bars were prepared for the analysis of fracture toughness test using the indentation-strength technique. Results The mean interfacial toughness of the LC/GV group was 0.69 MPam(1/2) (0.11), and did not significantly differ from that of the GV/GV control group, 0.74 MPam(1/2) (0.17) (p>0.05). However, the difference between the mean interfacial toughness of the ZC/GV group, 0.13 MPam(1/2) (0.07), and the LC/GV and the GV/GV groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Significance For bilayer all-ceramic restorations with high-strength core materials, the veneering ceramics are the weakest link in the design of the structure. Since all-ceramic restorations often fail from chipping of veneer layers or crack initiation at the interface, the protective effects of thermal mismatch stresses oral prosthesis design should be investigated.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Five-year follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns
2. Survival of in-ceram crowns in a private practice: a prospective clinical trial10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80015-3 ↗
3. Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10, 5 years: a prospective clinical study
4. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 ↗
5. A clinical evaluation of all-ceramic bridges placed in UK general dental practices: first-year results10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.937 ↗
6. HIP zirconia fixed partial dentures—clinical results after 3 years of clinical service
7. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up
8. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II. Fixed dental prostheses10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x ↗
9. Fractographic analyses of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.006 ↗
10. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results
11. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x ↗
12. Kingery · 1976
13. Barsoum · 2003
14. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.008 ↗
15. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015 ↗
16. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?10.1177/00220345970760061001 ↗
17. Direct measurement of fracture energies of brittle heterogeneous materials10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14677.x ↗
18. A simplified method for measuring plane strain fracture toughness10.1016/0013-7944(77)90028-5 ↗
19. Compliance calibration of a family of short rod and short bar fracture toughness specimens10.1016/0013-7944(83)90081-4 ↗
20. Compliance and stress intensity coefficients for short bar specimens with chevron notches10.1007/BF00018240 ↗
21. Barker · 1979 · 73
22. Compliance calibration of the short rod chevron-notch specimen for fracture-toughness testing of brittle materials10.1007/BF00019637 ↗
23. A review of chevron-notched fracture specimens
24. Fracture toughness of conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces
25. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces10.1177/00220345930720051801 ↗
26. A chevron-notched specimen for fracture toughness measurements of ceramic–metal interface
27. Fractography: determining the sites of fracture initiation10.1016/0109-5641(95)80045-X ↗
28. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling10.1177/00220345950740060301 ↗
29. Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed all-ceramic crowns10.1177/00220345940730120601 ↗
30. Structure–property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin–enamel junction10.1177/00220345940730050901 ↗
31. Anusavice · 2003
32. Compatibility of ceramic–ceramic systems for fixed prosthodontics
33. Calculation of interfacial stress in dental porcelain bonded to gold alloy substrate10.1177/00220345720510040901 ↗
34. Viscoelastic finite element stress analysis of the thermal compatibility of dental bilayer ceramic systems