journal article·2018-10

Characterisation of machinable structural polymers in restorative dentistry

Abdulrahman Elmougy, Alvaro Muñoz Schiemann, Duncan Wood, Sarah Pollington, Nicolas Martin

Dental Materials· Volume 34· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Objectives To characterise the mechanical properties of the machinable polymers Pekkton® (Cendres-Meteaux, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland), Lava Ultimate® (3MESPE, Seefeld, Germany), Vita Enamic® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and the ceramic IPS e.Max Press® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). To determine the structural integrity of full coverage crowns fabricated from these materials. Methods The following tests were conducted: Biaxial flexural strength (BFS) using the piston on 3 balls jig (n=10); Vickers Hardness (VH) 10 indentations per sample with 10kg load & 20s dwell time (n=5); Hygroscopic Expansion Change (HEC) in artificial saliva over 68 days (n=5). Structural Strength (SS) of teeth analogues (n=20) restored with monolithic crowns from the four materials. Mean values and standard deviations for BFS, VH, HEC and SS tests were calculated and compared using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's test at a level of 5% significance. Results BFS: IPS e.Max Press® (317MPa±37MPa), Pekkton® (227MPa±18MPa), Lava Ultimate® (145MPa±18MPa) and Vita Enamic® (137MPa±7MPa) with a significance between groups of p<0.0001. VH: IPS e.Max Press® (5064MPa±131MPa), Vita Enamic® (1976MPa±12MPa), Lava Ultimate® (924MPa±27MPa) and Pekkton® (445MPa±21MPa) with a significance between groups of p<0.0001. HEC (%vol change): Pekkton® (0.14%±0.14%), Vita Enamic® (0.38%±0.16%) and Lava Ultimate® (1.06%±0.17%). SS for full-coverage crowns: Pekkton® (2037N±49N no fracture), IPS e.Max Press® (1497N±165N), Lava Ultimate® (1476N±142N) and Vita Enamic® (1127N±108N). Significance The properties investigated suggest that full coverage monolithic PEKK crowns possess adequate mechanical and physical properties for use in the posterior region of the mouth. These results must be considered alongside other data including clinical studies.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical status of eleven CAD/CAM materials after one to twelve years of service
2. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications10.1177/0022034514553976 ↗
3. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material10.2174/1874210620130904003 ↗
4. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years10.1007/s00784-017-2293-x ↗
5. Polyetheretherketones
6. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon fibre reinforced PEEK in medical applications10.1007/BF01728981 ↗
7. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09948 ↗
8. Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem10.2106/JBJS.E.00316 ↗
9. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
10. Copponnex · 2009
11. Use of polyaryletherketone (PAEK) based polymer for implant-supported telescopic overdenture: a case report10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.74 ↗
12. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), a framework material for complete fixed and removable dental prostheses: a clinical report
13. Alsadon · 2016
14. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)—Durability and influence of surface conditioning10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008 ↗
15. Ki-Sun Lee, Joo-Hee Shin, Jong-Een Kim, Jee-Hwan Kim, Won-Chang Lee, Sang-Wan Shin, et al., Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post-core system: a 3D finite element analysis. BioMed Res Int; 2017.10.1155/2017/1373127 ↗
16. Wear of polyetherketoneketones—influence of titanium dioxide content and antagonistic material10.1016/j.dental.2017.12.009 ↗
17. Academy of dental materials guidance-resin composites: part I—mechanical properties10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013 ↗
18. Tensile properties of mineralised and demineralised human and bovine dentin10.1177/00220345940730061201 ↗
19. Numeric approach to the biomechanical analysis of thermal effects in coated implants
20. Load bearing capacity of all ceramic posterior four-unit fixed partial dentures with different zirconia frameworks10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00429.x ↗
21. Load bearing capacity of artificially aged zirconia fixed dental prostheses with heterogeneous abutment supports10.1007/s00784-011-0569-0 ↗
22. CENDRES+Metaux Website. http://www.cmdental.fr/medias/files/publications-pekkton-2014.pdf. [Accessed February 2015].
23. Al Marzar · 2015
24. Wear of ceramic and antagonist a systemic evaluation influence factor in vitro
25. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019 ↗
26. ISO 6872:2015 · 2015
27. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials10.1067/mpr.2003.42 ↗
28. Wypych · 2016
29. Hygroscopic expansion and solubility of composite restoratives10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00015-5 ↗
30. Measurement of water sorption in dental composites10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00157-9 ↗
31. Expansion behaviour of compomer restoratives10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00271-4 ↗
32. Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests10.1590/S1678-77572003000300002 ↗
33. multimedia.3m.com/mws/./lava-ultimate-restorative-change-of-indication-notice.pdf.
34. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90297-8 ↗
35. Comparative mechanical property characterization of 3 all-ceramic core materials
36. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements10.1016/0109-5641(91)90024-S ↗
37. Dental Ceramics
38. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002 ↗
39. Surface and mechanical properties of different dental composites
40. Vickers microhardness comparison of 4 composite resins with different types of filler10.17126/joralres.2015.061 ↗
41. Troughton · 2008
42. Water absorption, dimensional change and radial pressure in resin matrix dental restorative materials10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.088 ↗
43. Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials—a comparative study10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.014 ↗
44. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion10.1016/0109-5641(89)90142-5 ↗
45. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01460.x ↗
46. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study
47. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion10.1093/ejo/cjq097 ↗
48. The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.001 ↗