Mechanical and fracture behavior of veneer–framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives High-strength ceramics are required in dental posterior restorations in order to withstand the excessive tensile stresses that occur during mastication. The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture behavior and the fast-fracture mechanical strength of three veneer-framework composites (Empress 2/IPS Eris, TZP/Cercon S and Inceram-Zirconia/Vita VM7) for all-ceramic dental bridges. Methods The load bearing capacity of the veneer-framework composites were evaluated using a bending mechanical apparatus. The stress distribution through the rectangular-shaped layered samples was assessed using simple beam calculations and used to estimate the fracture strength of the veneer layer. Optical microscopy of fractured specimens was employed to determine the origin of cracks and the fracture mode. Results Under fast fracture conditions, cracks were observed to initiate on, or close to, the veneer outer surface and propagate towards the inner framework material. Crack deflection occurred at the veneer-framework interface of composites containing a tough framework material (TZP/Cercon S and Inceram-Zirconia/Vita VM7), as opposed to the straight propagation observed in the case of weaker frameworks (Empress 2/IPS Eris). Significance The mechanical strength of dental composites containing a weak framework (K(IC)<3 MPam(1/2)) is ultimately determined by the low fracture strength of the veneer layer, since no crack arresting occurs at the veneer-framework interface. Therefore, high-toughness ceramics (K(IC)>5 MPam(1/2)) should be used as framework materials of posterior all-ceramic bridges, so that cracks propagating from the veneer layer do not lead to a premature failure of the prosthesis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Ceramics in restorative and prosthetic dentistry10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.443 ↗
2. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.050 ↗
3. All-ceramic restorations by new direct ceramic machining process (DCM)
4. High reliable zirconia bridges by direct ceramic machining process (DCM)
5. Fatigue of zirconia under cyclic loading in water and its implications for the design of dental bridges10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.008 ↗
6. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.012 ↗
7. Ceramic steel10.1038/258703a0 ↗
8. Fracture resistance of three all-ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.001 ↗
9. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4 ↗
10. Strength of zirconia/veneer bilayered structures
11. Strength, reliability and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) dental ceramics10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.036 ↗
12. Influence of relative layer height and testing method on the failure mode and origin in a bilayered dental ceramic composite10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00005-1 ↗
13. Moduli of rupture of layered dental ceramics10.1016/0109-5641(94)90022-1 ↗
14. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains
15. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013 ↗
16. Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ. Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer–framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater; 2006, doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.011.10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.011 ↗
17. Ivoclar Vivadent AG, IPS Eris for E2, Instructions for Use, 2001.
18. Degudent, GmbH. Cercon Ceram S, Layering ceramics for zirconia frameworks—Product information and user instructions; 2002.
19. VITA Zahnfabrik GmbH. Veneering material VITAVM7 for all-ceramic framework materials, Preparation guide; 2002.
20. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass- infiltrated ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.003 ↗
21. Evaluation of Klc of Brittle Solids by the Indentation Method with Low Crack-to-Indent Ratios10.1007/BF00724706 ↗
22. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00005-7 ↗
23. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002 ↗
24. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00025-3 ↗
25. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in-vitro and in-vivo—analysis and modeling10.1177/00220345950740060301 ↗
26. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM)
27. Filser · 2001
28. Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic-materials10.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8 ↗
29. Fracture energy of glass-alumina interfaces via the bimaterial bend test10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02808.x ↗
30. Fatigue crack propagation path across the dentinoenamel junction complex in human teeth10.1002/jbm.a.10541 ↗
31. Comparison of different experimental techniques for determination of elastic properties of solids10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.080 ↗
32. Measurement of coatings’ elastic properties by mechanical methods: Part 1. Consideration on experimental errors10.1007/BF02323922 ↗
33. Timoshenko · 1972