journal article·2010-11

Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo

Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Norbert Krämer, Albert J. Feilzer, Roland Frankenberger

Dental Materials· Volume 26· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate marginal integrity of direct resin composite restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading in vitro, and before and after 6 years of clinical service in a prospective clinical trial. Methods For the in vitro part, MO cavities with the proximal box beneath the cemento-enamel junction were prepared in 32 extracted human third molars. The specimens were randomly assigned to four groups (n=8) and received bonded resin composite restorations (two groups each Grandio bonded with Solobond M and Tetric Ceram bonded with Syntac). Specimens were subjected to three different aging protocols: 6-year water storage (WS), thermo-mechanical loading (TML; 100,000×50N; 2500×+5/+55°C), and 6-year water storage plus thermo-mechanical loading (WS+TML). Initially and after aging, marginal qualities in enamel and dentin were evaluated using replicas at 200× magnification (SEM). For the in vivo part, 30 patients received 68 direct resin composite restorations of the same materials in a prospective clinical trial. Replicas of 11 selected subjects per group were assessed for marginal quality under a SEM at 200×. Results in vitro, all initial results showed nearly 100% gap-free margins. For TML, percentages of gap-free margins dropped to 87-90% in enamel and to 58-66% in dentin (p<0.05). For WS, enamel margins still were at 97-99% whereas dentin margins exhibited 67-75% gap-free margins, and for WS+TML, enamel margins were at 85-87% and dentin margins at 42-52% gap-free margins. In vivo, gap-free enamel margins were reduced from initially 86-90% to 74-80% after 6 years of clinical service (p<0.05). Proximally exposed dentin margins were not recordable by impressions, however, clinically no considerable problems like recurrent caries or discolorations were detected. Significance In vitro, hydrolytic degradation supports mechanical fatigue in dentin-composite bonds over time. In vivo, wear phenomena are superimposing marginal quality aspects. Gaps between enamel and resin composite did not play a major role.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Health and Care Utilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations10.1016/0300-5712(93)90026-M ↗
2. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00251.x ↗
3. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning10.1007/s00784-006-0076-x ↗
4. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80109-1 ↗
5. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results10.1177/154405910508400204 ↗
6. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin10.1177/154405910308200212 ↗
7. in vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x ↗
8. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration10.1177/00220345870660110601 ↗
9. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of adhesive restorative systems
10. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I. In vitro investigations
11. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?
12. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation
13. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.002 ↗
14. The effect of six years of water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin10.1002/jbm.b.20024 ↗
15. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.005 ↗
16. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study10.1177/00220345960750120501 ↗
17. Secondary caries
18. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II. In vivo investigations
19. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.003 ↗
20. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age
21. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations10.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-4 ↗
22. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition
23. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice10.3109/00016359709091943 ↗
24. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports
25. Load capability of excessively flared teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and all-ceramic crowns10.2341/05-142 ↗
26. Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement
27. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001 ↗
28. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0 ↗
29. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school10.2341/06-134 ↗
30. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003 ↗
31. Marginal integrity: clinical significance10.1016/0300-5712(94)90164-3 ↗
32. Pit and fissure sealing. Bonding of bulk-cured, low-filled, light-curing resins to bacteria-contaminated uncut enamel in high c-factor cavities
33. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.008 ↗
34. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions
35. The clinical performance of adhesives10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X ↗
36. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions