journal article·2020-11-01

Ecotoxicological Impact Assessment of the Production of Cotton Fabric

Jiahong Qian, Yuying Qiu, Xiang Ji, Yiduo Yang, Laili Wang

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 7· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Textiles and garments are increasingly being included in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies because the use of chemicals in industrial production of these items has potential environmental impacts. The USEtox model, characterized by ecotoxicity characterization factors based on abundant data, is a useful tool for assessing the toxicity of chemical pollutants. The objectives of this study were to estimate characterization factors of cotton fabric-related chemicals based on data from a quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) model and assess the ecotoxicological impact of cotton woven fabric. The research boundary ranged from fabric production to wet treatment. Wet treatment was found to contribute more to ecotoxicity than fabric production did, with primary alcohol ethoxylate and sodium hydroxide being the main pollutants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

Jiaxing University

Zhejiang Sci-Tech University and Zhejiang Ecological Civilization Research Center

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang L.L. · Journal of Environmental Management · 2014 · 17 · 14
2. World Trade Organization. International trade statistics review. 2018. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2018_e/wts2018_e.pdf (accessed April 2019).
3. Hu K. · Textile Science Research · 2018 · 3 · 26
4. Thiry M. C. · AATCC Review · 2011 · 11 · 26
5. 2014
6. 10.1007/s11367-015-0895-610.1007/s11367-015-0895-6 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11367-015-0889-410.1007/s11367-015-0889-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.03410.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11367-011-0316-410.1007/s11367-011-0316-4 ↗
10. Roos S. · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · 2017 · 23 · 89010.1007/s11367-017-1330-y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.14810.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.148 ↗
12. Ash M. · 2008
13. 10.1007/978-3-642-18898-510.1007/978-3-642-18898-5 ↗
14. Fantke P. USEtox 2.0 Documentation. Version 1. http://usetox.org (accessed April 2019).
15. Hauschild M.Z., McKone T.E., Meent D., Huijbregts M., Margni M., Rosenbaum R.K., Jolliet O., Fantke P. USEtox 2.1, USEtox International Center.
16. 10.1007/s11367-011-0318-210.1007/s11367-011-0318-2 ↗
17. Luo Y. · Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology · 2018 · 13 · 87
18. Zuo J. Reference document on best available techniques for the textiles industry; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp 215–217.
19. Zhou D. · Progress in Textile Science & Technology · 2012 · 2012 · 17
20. Zheng H. · 2017