journal article·2021-10Open access

Hollow-walled lattice materials by additive manufacturing: Design, manufacture, properties, applications and challenges

J. Noronha, M. Qian, M. Leary, E. Kyriakou, M. Brandt

Abstract

Abstract The rapid growth of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies has enabled the emergence of geometrically sophisticated materials or structures with tailored and/or enhanced mechanical responses. In addition to dense-walled lattice structures, innovation within the past decade has identified that hollow-walled lattice topologies exhibit the multifaceted potential of competitive strength and rigidity, whilst displaying unique deformation behaviours, indicating that they may be an important subsequent step in lattice evolution. Hollow-walled sections facilitate density and geometrical parameters well below what is achievable by dense-walled sections, providing additional hierarchies of architecture at micrometre to even nanoscale proportion. Their wall thickness can range from 20 nm to 800 µm while the relative density can span three orders of magnitude between 0.01% and 30%. Despite nearly a decade of research into hollow-walled lattice topologies, no meta-analysis exists to provide an informative overview of these structures. This research addresses this deficiency and provides a data-driven review of hollow-walled lattice materials. It elucidates how these hollow-walled lattices deviate from the current limitations of dense-walled lattices and the underlying mechanisms that dictate their performance, with data accumulated from an exhaustive collection of literature sources. A range of new insights into their design and manufacture is discussed for their future research and applications in different engineering fields.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. G. Battista Hodierna, L'occhio della mosca: discorso fisico intorno all'anatomia dell'occhio in tutti gl'animali anulosi, detti insetti, recentemente scoverta, e pratticata. Palermo, 1644.
2. R. Hooke, Micrographia. London: The Royal Society, 1665.
3. S. Youssefian, N. Rahbar, Molecular origin of strength and stiffness in bamboo fibrils, Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015. Available: 10.1038/srep11116.10.1038/srep11116 ↗
4. E. Dumont, Bone density and the lightweight skeletons of birds, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 277, no. 1691, pp. 2193-2198, 2010. Available: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0117.10.1098/rspb.2010.0117 ↗
5. T. Sullivan, B. Wang, H. Espinosa and M. Meyers, “Extreme lightweight structures: avian feathers and bones”, Materials Today, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 377-391, 2017. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136970211730072X.10.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.004 ↗
6. Microimaging-informed continuum micromechanics accurately predicts macroscopic stiffness and strength properties of hierarchical plant culm materials10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.009 ↗
7. I. Gibson, M. Ashby, The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials, Proc. Royal Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 382, no. 1782, pp. 43-59, 1982. Available: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1982.0088.10.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
8. Fracture toughness of brittle cellular solids10.1016/0036-9748(84)90510-6 ↗
9. Deformation and energy absorption diagrams for cellular solids10.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
10. The mechanical properties of cellular solids10.1007/BF02645546 ↗
11. Mechanics of BCC and FCC hollow-sphere foams10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00890-0 ↗
12. Mechanics of hollow sphere foams10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00583-X ↗
13. W. Sanders, Mechanical behavior of closed-cell and hollow-sphere metallic foams, Hdl.handle.net, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28244.
14. Mechanical behavior of metallic foams10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191 ↗
15. K. Hurysz, et al., “Steel and Titanium Hollow Sphere Foams”, MRS Proceedings, vol. 521, 1998. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive/article/steel-and-titanium-hollow-sphere-foams/22C78067BC476703692564E591B9D146.10.1557/PROC-521-191 ↗
16. Cellular metal lattices with hollow trusses10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.024 ↗
17. Pyramidal lattice truss structures with hollow trusses10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.048 ↗
18. The production of open cellular lattice structures using selective laser melting
19. Ultralight Metallic Microlattices10.1126/science.1211649 ↗
20. Mechanical characterization of hollow ceramic nanolattices10.1007/s10853-013-7945-x ↗
21. The effect of manufacturing defects on compressive strength of ultralight hollow microlattices: A data-driven study
22. Mechanical performance of hollow tetrahedral truss cores10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.04.006 ↗
23. Design and fabrication of hollow rigid nanolattices via two-photon lithography10.1002/adem.201300254 ↗
24. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials10.1126/science.1252291 ↗
25. Concepts for enhanced energy absorption using hollow micro-lattices10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007 ↗
26. Elastically-isotropic elementary cubic lattices composed of tailored hollow beams10.1016/j.eml.2018.04.005 ↗
27. Mechanical response of lightweight hollow truss metal oxide lattices10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100439 ↗
28. Composite bending-dominated hollow nanolattices: A stiff, cyclable mechanical metamaterial10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.027 ↗
29. Diamond-structured hollow-tube lattice Ni materials via 3D printing10.1007/s11426-016-0093-x ↗
30. Fabrication and anti-crushing performance of hollow honeytubes10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107522 ↗
31. Emergence of new density-strength scaling law in 3D hollow ceramic nanoarchitectures10.1002/smll.201802239 ↗
32. Quasi-static energy absorption of hollow microlattice structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.024 ↗
33. Elastic behavior of open-cell alumina10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05632.x ↗
34. Open-cell foams with hollow struts: Mechanical property enhancements10.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.047 ↗
35. Enhancement of mechanical properties of hollow-strut foams: Analysis10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.016 ↗
36. R. Gentle, P. Edwards, B. Bolton, “Statics”, Mechanical Engineering Systems, pp. 204-294, 2001. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780750652131500052.10.1016/B978-075065213-1/50005-2 ↗
37. M. Ashby, D. Cebon, Materials selection in mechanical design, Le Journal de Physique IV, vol. 03, no. 7, pp. C7-1-C7-9, 1993. Available: 10.1051/jp4:1993701.10.1051/jp4:1993701 ↗
38. Materials and cross-sectional shapes for bending stiffness10.1016/0921-5093(93)90577-2 ↗
39. A. Amany, D. Pasini, Material and shape selection for stiff beams under non-uniform flexure, Materials & Design, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1110-1117, 2009. Available: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.029.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.029 ↗
40. U. Wegst and M. Ashby, “The structural efficiency of orthotropic stalks, stems and tubes”, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 21, pp. 9005-9014, 2007. Available: 10.1007/s10853-007-1936-8.10.1007/s10853-007-1936-8 ↗
41. “Formulas for stress and strain. 5th Edition”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 93, 1978. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0148906278914663.10.1016/0148-9062(78)91466-3 ↗
42. Failure modes in open-cell foams with hollow struts10.1016/j.matlet.2008.07.007 ↗
43. N. Anwar, F. Najam, Response and Design of Column Cross-Sections, Structural Cross Sections, pp. 329-390, 2017. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128044438000051.10.1016/B978-0-12-804443-8.00005-1 ↗
44. H. Ly, et al., Quantification of Uncertainties on the Critical Buckling Load of Columns under Axial Compression with Uncertain Random Materials, Materials, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1828, 2019. Available: 10.3390/ma12111828.10.3390/ma12111828 ↗
45. J. Lund, Buckling of cylindrical members with respect to axial loads, Hdl.handle.net, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/242019.
46. J. Wang, W. Chan, Effects of defects on the buckling load of rodpack laminates, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., vol. 45, no. 3, p. 216, 2000. Available: 10.4050/jahs.45.216.10.4050/JAHS.45.216 ↗
47. P. Desai, C. Satish, Effect of slenderness ratio on euler critical load for elastic columns with ANSYS, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 40-43, 2018. Available: 10.9790/9622-0805034043.
48. “Column Buckling | MechaniCalc”, Mechanicalc.com, 2020. Online. Available: .
49. J. Johnson, The theory and practice of modern framed structures, designed for the use of schools, and for engineers in professional practice, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1893.
50. Large deformation response of additively-manufactured FCC metamaterials: From octet truss lattices towards continuous shell mesostructures10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.003 ↗
51. Creating hollow microlattice materials reinforced by carbon nanotubes for improved mechanical properties10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.012 ↗
52. L. Salari-Sharif, T. Schaedler, L. Valdevit, Hybrid hollow microlattices with unique combination of stiffness and damping, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. vol. 140, no. 3, 2018. Available: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/materialstechnology/article/140/3/031003/372342/Hybrid-Hollow-Microlattices-With-Unique.10.1115/1.4038672 ↗
53. Micro-scale truss structures formed from self-propagating photopolymer waveguides10.1002/adma.200700797 ↗
54. X. Chen, M. Easton, N. Birbilis, H. Yang, T. Abbott, Corrosion-resistant electrochemical plating of magnesium (Mg) alloys, Corrosion Prevention of Magnesium Alloys, pp. 315-346, 2013. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857094377500119.10.1533/9780857098962.3.315 ↗
55. R. Meirowitz, Coating processes and techniques for smart textiles, Active Coatings for Smart Textiles, pp. 159-177, 2016. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081002636000083.10.1016/B978-0-08-100263-6.00008-3 ↗
56. Size effect suppresses brittle failure in hollow Cu60Zr40 metallic glass nanolattices deformed at cryogenic temperatures10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01034 ↗
57. L. Montemayor, J. Greer, Mechanical Response of hollow metallic nanolattices: combining structural and material size effects, J. Appl. Mech., vol. 82, no. 7, 2015. Available: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/appliedmechanics/article-abstract/82/7/071012/440100/Mechanical-Response-of-Hollow-Metallic?redirectedFrom=fulltext.10.1115/1.4030361 ↗
58. J. Surjadi, X. Feng, R. Fan, W. Lin, X. Li, Y. Lu, Hollow medium-entropy alloy nanolattices with ultrahigh energy absorption and resilience, NPG Asia Materials, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021. Available: 10.1038/s41427-021-00306-y.10.1038/s41427-021-00306-y ↗
59. M. Leskelä, J. Niinistö, M. Ritala, Atomic layer deposition, Comprehensive Materials Processing, pp. 101-123, 2014. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080965321004015.10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00401-5 ↗
60. Fabrication and deformation of three-dimensional hollow ceramic nanostructures10.1038/nmat3738 ↗
61. Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices10.1126/science.1255908 ↗
62. N. Dou, R. Jagt, C. Portela, J. Greer, A. Minnich, Ultralow thermal conductivity and mechanical resilience of architected nanolattices, Nano Lett., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4755-4761, 2018. Available: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01191.10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01191 ↗
63. F. Basile, et al., A novel electrochemical route for the catalytic coating of metallic supports, Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts - Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, July 11-15, 2010, pp. 51-58, 2010. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167299110750072.10.1016/S0167-2991(10)75007-2 ↗
64. Thermal transport in hollow metallic microlattices10.1063/1.5114955 ↗
65. L. Valdevit, S. Godfrey, T. Schaedler, A. Jacobsen, W. Carter, Compressive strength of hollow microlattices: Experimental characterization, modeling, and optimal design, J. Mater. Res., vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 2461-2473, 2013. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-materials-research/article/compressive-strength-of-hollow-microlattices-experimental-characterization-modeling-and-optimal-design/B77268E713F72C15A7B2620890899E89.10.1557/jmr.2013.160 ↗
66. Accurate stiffness measurement of ultralight hollow metallic microlattices by laser vibrometry10.1007/s11340-014-9917-8 ↗
67. Characterization of nickel-based microlattice materials with structural hierarchy from the nanometer to the millimeter scale10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.007 ↗
68. A. Wittek, K. Miller, Computational biomechanics for medical image analysis, Handbook of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, pp. 953-977, 2020. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128161760000442.10.1016/B978-0-12-816176-0.00044-2 ↗
69. K. Roy, S. Kar, R. Das, Computational Chemistry, Understanding the Basics of QSAR for Applications in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Risk Assessment, pp. 151-189, 2015. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128015056000053.10.1016/B978-0-12-801505-6.00005-3 ↗
70. SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
71. M. Ashby, The properties of foams and lattices, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 364, no. 1838, pp. 15-30, 2005. Available: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1678.10.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
72. H. Wadley, D. Queheillalt, Thermal applications of cellular lattice structures, Mater. Sci. Forum, vol. 539-543, pp. 242-247, 2007. Available: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.539-543.242.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.242 ↗
73. Thermal design, optimization and additive manufacturing of ceramic regular structures to maximize the radiative heat transfer10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107539 ↗
74. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1 ↗
75. Bioactive Ti metal analogous to human cancellous bone: Fabrication by selective laser melting and chemical treatments10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.034 ↗
76. Scaffold: A novel carrier for cell and drug delivery10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v29.i1.10 ↗
77. Honeywell International Inc, “Systems and methods for protecting a flight recorder”, US8723057B2, 2020.
78. Selective electron beam manufactured Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures for orthopedic implant applications: Current status and outstanding challenges10.1016/j.cossms.2018.05.002 ↗
79. Inconel 625 lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM): Mechanical properties, deformation and failure modes10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
80. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
81. Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
82. Influence of ovalisation on the plastic collapse of thick cylindrical tubes under uniform bending10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.05.004 ↗
83. Modeling and simulation for cross-sectional ovalization of thin-walled tubes in continuous rotary straightening process10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.021 ↗
84. X. Zhang, H. Tang, M. Leary, T. Song, L. Jia, M. Qian, Toward manufacturing quality Ti-6Al-4V lattice struts by selective electron beam melting (SEBM) for lattice design, JOM, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1870-1876, 2018. Available: 10.1007/s11837-018-3030-x.10.1007/s11837-018-3030-x ↗
85. A. Alghamdi, D. Downing, M. McMillan, M. Brandt, M. Qian, M. Leary, Experimental and numerical assessment of surface roughness for Ti6Al4V lattice elements in selective laser melting, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 105, no. 1-4, pp. 1275-1293, 2019. Available: 10.1007/s00170-019-04092-4.10.1007/s00170-019-04092-4 ↗
86. M. Leary, Surface roughness optimisation for selective laser melting (SLM), Laser Additive Manufacturing, pp. 99-118, 2017. Available: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100433-3.00004-x.10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00004-X ↗
87. A. Sarker, et al., Angle defines attachment: Switching the biological response to titanium interfaces by modifying the inclination angle during selective laser melting, Mater. Des., vol. 154, pp. 326-339, 2018. Available: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.043.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.043 ↗
88. A. Alghamdi, et al., Effect of polygon order on additively manufactured lattice structures: a method for defining the threshold resolution for lattice geometry, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 105, no. 5-6, pp. 2501-2511, 2019. Available: 10.1007/s00170-019-04168-1.10.1007/s00170-019-04168-1 ↗
89. Performance of strut-reinforced Kagome truss core structure under compression fabricated by selective laser melting10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107541 ↗
90. O. Al-Ketan, D. Lee, R. Rowshan, R. Abu Al-Rub, Functionally graded and multi-morphology sheet TPMS lattices: Design, manufacturing, and mechanical properties, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 102, p. 103520, 2020. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616119312482.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103520 ↗
91. Z. Xie, The reinforcement optimization of thin-walled square tubes for bending crashworthiness, Int. J. Crashworthiness, pp. 1-7, 2020. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13588265.2020.1766186?journalCode=tcrs20.
92. Arora, Optimum design with MATLAB®“, Introduction to Optimum Design, pp. 275-298, 2012. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123813756000073.10.1016/B978-0-12-381375-6.00007-3 ↗
93. Bending
94. Fabrication and mechanical behaviors of corrugated lattice truss composite sandwich panels10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.003 ↗