Magnetic exchange coupling in bilayers of two epitaxial ferromagnetic oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Despite a decade of research effort on La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrRuO3 (LSMO/SRO) bilayers (BLs), a full knowledge on the magnetic properties and integration of these BLs on silicon substrate is not yet in sight. In this paper, we report on the magnetic exchange coupling observed from the above two ferromagnetic oxide thin film BLs, prepared through a novel approach, called ‘domain matching epitaxy’. LSMO (100 nm)/SRO (45 nm) and LSMO (31 nm)/SRO (45 nm) bilayers have been epitaxially integrated with Si (1 0 0). Notably, in the former sample, positive exchange bias is observed – an indication of antiferromagnetic exchange coupling and is found to be absent in the latter. Furthermore, in the former sample, the cross-over from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic interface exchange coupling is noticed by varying the cooling field. We have verified that this coupling is of magnetic origin, not due to electrostatic interaction by inserting a thin (∼10 nm) SrTiO3 layer between LSMO and SRO. We believe that in addition to the formation of interface domain walls, the strong interplay among Zeeman, anisotropic and exchange energies could play a dominant role. Our results would have important implications for devices comprising of magnetic exchange coupled systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Monkman · Nat Mater · 2012 · 11 · 85510.1038/nmat3405 ↗
2. Yin · Nat Mater · 2013 · 12 · 39710.1038/nmat3564 ↗
3. Ke · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 545810.1063/1.1767955 ↗
4. Ke · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 10K11510.1063/1.1855702 ↗
5. Singamaneni · J Appl Phys · 2015 · 117 · 17B71110.1063/1.4913630 ↗
6. Narayan · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 270310.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.070 ↗
7. Rao · Nano Lett · 2013 · 13 · 581410.1021/nl4023435 ↗
8. Singamaneni · J Appl Phys · 2014 · 116 · 09410310.1063/1.4894508 ↗
9. Goto · J Appl Phys · 1965 · 36 · 295110.1063/1.1714613 ↗
10. See supplementary material at [ ] for Comparison of isothermal magnetization of sample F collected below (at 4K) and above (at 200K) TC (∼168K) of SRO, recorded after the sample F was under cooled under the cooling field (CF) of +4T, inferring that PEB is of magnetic origin as we see no M-H loop shift at 200K; Absence of training effect observed from the sample F at 4K for 5 consecutive cycles. The data were collected when the sample was cooled under CF of +4T. After each run, the sample was warmed up to 400K, to eliminate the thermo-magnetic cycling effects; Isothermal magnetization of sample F collected at 4K when the sample was cooled under negative magnetic field (a) and positive magnetic field. A clear evidence for positive exchange bias (PEB) could be noticed; Variation of SRO magnetic moment (measured from MH loops) as a function of cooling field (CF) dependence measured at 4K, indicating (shown by red dotted line) the cross-over from AFM to FM coupling.
11. Ziese · J Appl Phys · 2013 · 113 · 06391110.1063/1.4790877 ↗
12. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2014 · 105 · 20240110.1063/1.4902115 ↗
13. Ke · Phys Rev Lett · 2013 · 110 · 23720110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.237201 ↗
14. Solignac · Phys Rev Lett · 2012 · 109 · 02720110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.027201 ↗
15. Nogués · J Magn Magn Mater · 1999 · 192 · 20310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗