journal article·2011-09-09

Variations in Atomic Disorder in Biogenic Carbonate Hydroxyapatite Using the Infrared Spectrum Grinding Curve Method

Yotam Asscher, Steve Weiner, Elisabetta Boaretto

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 21· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Biogenic carbonate hydroxyapatite crystals are inherently disordered at the atomic level due mainly to the substitutions of various ions in the crystal structure, and, in the case of the bone family of materials, to the fact that these very small crystals have a very large surface‐to‐bulk ratio. Characterization of the extent of disorder is of much interest, as this relates to the stability and hence solubility of the crystals. Here the infrared spectrometry grinding curve approach developed for calcite, is adapted to carbonate hydroxyapatites. The infrared splitting factor is plotted against the full width at half height of the strong phosphate absorption peak as a function of increased grinding of the sample. By doing so, the contribution of particle size to the shape of the peaks is better separated from the contribution of atomic disorder to peak shape. It is shown that differences in disorder exist between dentine, cementum, and bone crystals which could reflect crystal size and/or atomic defects within the crystal. It is als shown that systematic differences exist between enamel samples from different taxa, which we assume only reflects atomic disorder differences within these large crystals. The method can be used to characterize atomic disorder in natural hydroxyapatites, as well as in the many different types of synthetic hydroxyapatites used for biomedical implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Bone and Dental Protein Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/b401318b10.1039/b401318b ↗
2. 10.1016/0272-8842(93)90050-210.1016/0272-8842(93)90050-2 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-0-387-77718-410.1007/978-0-387-77718-4 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.27110.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.271 ↗
5. 10.1107/S0365110X6100342910.1107/S0365110X61003429 ↗
6. 10.1038/211268a010.1038/211268a0 ↗
7. 10.1039/an959840020110.1039/an9598400201 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20100389010.1002/adma.201003890 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.02710.1016/j.jas.2010.06.027 ↗
10. Ferraiolo J. A. · 2008
11. 10.1016/0146-3535(81)90046-010.1016/0146-3535(81)90046-0 ↗
12. 10.1093/oso/9780195049770.001.000110.1093/oso/9780195049770.001.0001 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0240536410.1007/BF02405364 ↗
14. Boyde A. · 1965 · 163
15. Nanci A. · 2008
16. 10.2138/rmg.2002.48.1110.2138/rmg.2002.48.11 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0255370410.1007/BF02553704 ↗
18. 10.1177/0022034591070005100110.1177/00220345910700051001 ↗
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199702)28:2/3<151::AID-JRS71>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199702)28:2/3<151::AID-JRS71>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0254622210.1007/BF02546222 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-5320(60)80020-210.1016/S0022-5320(60)80020-2 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0255496910.1007/BF02554969 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.02910.1016/j.jas.2010.01.029 ↗
24. Suga S. · 1989 · 353
25. 10.1007/BF0255517310.1007/BF02555173 ↗
26. Smith B. C. · 1996
27. 10.1006/jasc.2000.063310.1006/jasc.2000.0633 ↗
28. 10.1016/0305-4403(90)90058-D10.1016/0305-4403(90)90058-D ↗
29. 10.1006/jasc.1998.029310.1006/jasc.1998.0293 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0240718110.1007/BF02407181 ↗
31. Bevington P. R. · 1969
32. 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.00110.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.001 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.091421810710.1073/pnas.0914218107 ↗
34. 10.1038/211268a010.1038/211268a0 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0254622810.1007/BF02546228 ↗
36. 10.3109/0300820940906196910.3109/03008209409061969 ↗
37. 10.1006/jasc.1995.002410.1006/jasc.1995.0024 ↗
38. Y.Asscher S.Weiner E.Boaretto Archaeosciences In Press2011.