Piezoelectric Gold: Strong Charge‐Load Response in a Metal‐Based Hybrid Nanomaterial
Source abstract
Abstract
Impregnating the pores of nanoporous gold with aqueous electrolyte yields a hybrid nanomaterial with two separate and interpenetrating charge transport paths, electronic conduction in the metal and ionic conduction in the electrolyte. As the two paths are capacitively connected, space‐charge layers along the internal interfaces are coupled to electric potential differences between the paths and can be controlled or detected thereby. The present experiments show that the space charge couples to mechanical deformation of the hybrid material, so that external loading generates an electric current. The electric signal originates from charge displacement along the entire internal interface; the signal is particularly robust since the interface area is large. The charge transfer in response to load constitutes a piezoelectric response, yet the mechanism is quite different to classic piezoelectricity. The analysis in this work predicts links between electromechanical coupling parameters for strain sensing and actuation, which are in excellent agreement with the experiment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoporous metals and alloys · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Physics and Technology Hamburg University of Technology 21073 Hamburg Germany
Institute of Solid Mechanics Beihang University (BUAA) Beijing 100191 P. R. China
Institute of Materials Research Materials Mechanics Helmholtz‐Zentrum Geesthacht 21502 Geesthacht Germany
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/ULTSYM.1996.58404610.1109/ULTSYM.1996.584046 ↗
2. Gokhshtein A. · Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR · 1969 · 187 · 601
3. 10.1039/b913448d10.1039/b913448d ↗
4. 10.1126/science.108102410.1126/science.1081024 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.116810.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1168 ↗
6. 10.1038/3506852910.1038/35068529 ↗
7. 10.1557/mrs2009.15710.1557/mrs2009.157 ↗
8. 10.1080/21663831.2015.109467910.1080/21663831.2015.1094679 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20070276010.1002/adma.200702760 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl903262b10.1021/nl903262b ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20060023210.1002/smll.200600232 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.04.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.04.003 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn507466n10.1021/nn507466n ↗
14. 10.1021/la047838a10.1021/la047838a ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00314-X10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00314-X ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.00810.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.008 ↗
17. One can show that the closed‐ and open‐circuit Young's moduli are related by. With the experimental data for the volume‐specific capacitance cVand for the coupling coefficientof our material the two elastic constants are found to differ relatively by less than 10–4.
18. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.09.03810.1016/j.susc.2008.09.038 ↗
19. 10.1002/adem.20090032910.1002/adem.200900329 ↗
20. 10.1209/0295-5075/89/6600110.1209/0295-5075/89/66001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.06710.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.067 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.03810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.038 ↗
23. Kaye G. · 1995
24. 10.1209/0295-5075/78/1300110.1209/0295-5075/78/13001 ↗
25. 10.1039/c1cp21781j10.1039/c1cp21781j ↗
26. 10.1149/2.055210jes10.1149/2.055210jes ↗
27. 10.1021/la501353g10.1021/la501353g ↗
28. 10.1021/jp072405c10.1021/jp072405c ↗
29. 10.1038/nature0302810.1038/nature03028 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2009.018410.1557/jmr.2009.0184 ↗
31. Gibson L. J. · 1999
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.02110.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.021 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.08.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.08.002 ↗
34. 10.1351/pac19916305071110.1351/pac199163050711 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.12.00910.1016/j.electacta.2003.12.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)03008-D10.1016/0022-0728(93)03008-D ↗