Biasing Buckling Direction in Shape‐Programmable Hydrogel Sheets with Through‐Thickness Gradients
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A photocrosslinkable poly(N, N′‐diethylacrylamide) copolymer allows for the photolithographic fabrication of hydrogel sheets with nonuniform crosslinking density and swelling ratio. Using this material system, different 3D shapes with nonzero Gaussian curvature K are successfully programmed by prescribing a “metric” defined by in‐plane variations in swelling. However, this methodology does not control the direction of buckling adopted by each positive K feature, and therefore cannot controllably select between different isometric shapes defined by a single metric. Here, by introducing gradients in swelling through the thickness of the gel sheet by tuning the absorption of the UV‐light used for crosslinking, a preferential buckling direction is locally specified for each feature by the direction of UV exposure. By also controlling the strength of coupling between neighboring features, this is shown to be an effective method to program buckling direction of each unit within a canonical corrugated surface shape.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA 01003 USA
Department of Physics University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA 01003 USA
Funding
Army Research Office · National Science Foundation
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms325710.1038/ncomms3257 ↗
2. 10.3390/biomimetics303002410.3390/biomimetics3030024 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms153110.1038/ncomms1531 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20120369210.1002/adfm.201203692 ↗
5. 10.1039/C3SM51883C10.1039/C3SM51883C ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.09.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.09.001 ↗
7. 10.1038/419579a10.1038/419579a ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.06810110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.068101 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0sm00479k10.1039/c0sm00479k ↗
10. Spivak M. · 1979
11. Henderson D. W. · 1998
12. 10.1038/nmat443310.1038/nmat4433 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.126101910.1126/science.1261019 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.121530910.1126/science.1215309 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6SM00714G10.1039/C6SM00714G ↗
16. 10.1126/science.113599410.1126/science.1135994 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7SM00088J10.1039/C7SM00088J ↗
18. 10.1039/c1sm05476g10.1039/c1sm05476g ↗
19. 10.1016/j.coche.2012.10.00310.1016/j.coche.2012.10.003 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.120387410.1126/science.1203874 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20150343410.1002/adfm.201503434 ↗
22. 10.1021/am506926w10.1021/am506926w ↗
23. 10.1126/sciadv.160232610.1126/sciadv.1602326 ↗
24. 10.1021/am405371r10.1021/am405371r ↗
25. 10.1063/1.370071910.1063/1.3700719 ↗
26. 10.1073/pnas.180470211510.1073/pnas.1804702115 ↗
27. 10.1039/C8SM00103K10.1039/C8SM00103K ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat454410.1038/nmat4544 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20170892610.1002/anie.201708926 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.03310.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.033 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4SM00845F10.1039/C4SM00845F ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.06.01310.1016/j.tibtech.2011.06.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.02.01210.1016/j.addr.2012.02.012 ↗
34. 10.1002/adhm.20120045810.1002/adhm.201200458 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl400774410.1021/nl4007744 ↗
36. 10.1021/ma300784d10.1021/ma300784d ↗
37. 10.1021/ma034737v10.1021/ma034737v ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20160156910.1002/adfm.201601569 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma981171f10.1021/ma981171f ↗
40. 10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00149-410.1016/S0141-3910(99)00149-4 ↗
41. 10.1021/ma801912810.1021/ma8019128 ↗
42. Chiappelli M. C. · 2012
43. 10.1039/b918969f10.1039/b918969f ↗
44. do Carmo M. P. · 1976
45. 10.1039/c3sm51881g10.1039/c3sm51881g ↗
46. 10.1093/qjmam/8.2.19110.1093/qjmam/8.2.191 ↗
47. 10.1039/C9SM00392D10.1039/C9SM00392D ↗
48. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
49. Kroon D.‐J. · 2014