Quantum‐Chemical Characterization of the Origin of Dipole Formation at Molecular Organic/Organic Interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recent experiments have reported a vacuum level shift at the interface between organic materials due to the formation of an interface dipole layer. On the basis of quantum‐chemical calculations, this paper sheds light on the factors contributing to the formation of an interface dipole between an electron donor and an electron acceptor, considering as model system a complex made of tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) as a donor and tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) as an acceptor. The results indicate that the interface dipole is governed both by charge‐transfer and polarization effects and allow for disentangling of their respective contributions. Two regimes of charge transfer can be distinguished depending on the strength of the electronic coupling: a fractional charge transfer occurs in the strong coupling regime while only integer charges are transferred when the coupling is weak. The polarization contribution can be significant, even in the presence of a pronounced charge transfer between the donor and acceptor molecules. The values of ionization potential and electron affinity of the donor and acceptor molecules may experience shifts as large as several tenths of an eV at the interface with respect to the isolated compounds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
2. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199906)11:8<605::AID-ADMA605>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199906)11:8<605::AID-ADMA605>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
3. Shen C. · 2001 · 351
4. 10.1002/polb.1065810.1002/polb.10658 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20039006510.1002/adma.200390065 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja025673r10.1021/ja025673r ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20060111610.1002/adfm.200601116 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.04130610.1103/PhysRevB.71.041306 ↗
9. H.Vázquez F.Flores A.Kahn inProc. Int. Symp. Super‐Functionality Organic Devices IPAP Conf. Series 6 The Institute of Pure and Applied Physics Tokyo2005 p.1.
10. 10.1143/JJAP.44.375110.1143/JJAP.44.3751 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja01041a00110.1021/ja01041a001 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)99099-410.1016/S0040-4020(01)99099-4 ↗
13. 10.1021/ar50116a00410.1021/ar50116a004 ↗
14. 10.1039/cs986150047510.1039/cs9861500475 ↗
15. The electronegativity is defined as$\chi = {{IP + EA} \over 2} \chi = {{IP + EA} \over 2}$ with IP the ionization potential and EA the electron affinity. The difference between the electronegativities of the donor and acceptor is given by:$\chi _D - \chi _A = {{IP_D + EA_D } \over 2} - {{IP_A + EA{}_A} \over 2} = {{IP_D - EA_A } \over 2} - {{IP_A - EA_D } \over 2}\chi _D - \chi _A = {{IP_D + EA_D } \over 2} - {{IP_A + EA{}_A} \over 2} = {{IP_D - EA_A } \over 2} - {{IP_A - EA_D } \over 2}$ where the first term is proportional to the energy of the excited CT state$\Psi$Ψ(D+A–) while the second term is proportional to the energy of the CT state$\Psi$Ψ(D−A+). Thus the larger the absolute value of the differenceχD–χA the more effective is the charge transfer from the donor to the acceptor with respect to the back CT (from the acceptor to the donor).
16. 10.1073/pnas.09214339910.1073/pnas.092143399 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.09610410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.096104 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.215125310.1063/1.2151253 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.210764710.1063/1.2107647 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja00299a02410.1021/ja00299a024 ↗
21. 10.1021/ic00344a04510.1021/ic00344a045 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
24. M. J.Frisch G. W.Trucks H. B.Schlegel G. E.Scuseria M. A.Robb J. R.Cheeseman J. A.Montgomery Jr T.Vreven K. N.Kudin J. C.Burant J. M.Millam S. S.Iyengar J.Tomasi V.Barone B.Mennucci M.Cossi G.Scalmani N.Rega G. A.Petersson H.Nakatsuji M.Hada M.Ehara K.Toyota R.Fukuda J.Hasegawa M.Ishida T.Nakajima Y.Honda O.Kitao H.Nakai M.Klene X.Li J. E.Knox H. P.Hratchian J. B.Cross C.Adamo J.Jaramillo R.Gomperts R. E.Stratmann O.Yazyev A. J.Austin R.Cammi C.Pomelli J. W.Ochterski P. Y.Ayala K.Morokuma G. A.Voth P.Salvador J. J.Dannenberg V. G.Zakrzewski S.Dapprich A. D.Daniels M. C.Strain O.Farkas D. K.Malick A. D.Rabuck K.Raghavachari J. B.Foresman J. V.Ortiz Q.Cui A. G.Baboul S.Clifford J.Cioslowski B. B.Stefanov G.Liu A.Liashenko P.Piskorz I.Komaromi R. L.Martin D. J.Fox T.Keith M. A.Al‐Laham C. Y.Peng A.Nanayakkara M.Challacombe P. M. W.Gill B.Johnson W.Chen M. W.Wong C.Gonzalez J. A.Pople Gaussian 03 Revision C.02; Gaussian Inc Wallingford CT2004.
25. 10.1063/1.167752710.1063/1.1677527 ↗
26. Bachrach S. M. · 1994 · 171
27. 10.1080/0026897700010156110.1080/00268977000101561 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20070062210.1002/adma.200700622 ↗
29. 10.1209/epl/i2003-10131-210.1209/epl/i2003-10131-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.08410.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.084 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.07.00610.1016/j.orgel.2006.07.006 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.216851510.1063/1.2168515 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.239689910.1063/1.2396899 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.10.00610.1016/j.orgel.2006.10.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.00510.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.005 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00774-110.1016/S0009-2614(02)00774-1 ↗
37. 10.1021/jp971652l10.1021/jp971652l ↗
38. 10.1021/jp953307710.1021/jp9533077 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.11.00210.1016/j.chemphys.2006.11.002 ↗
40. 10.1021/ct049851d10.1021/ct049851d ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0052848410.1007/BF00528484 ↗
42. 10.1002/cphc.20070013010.1002/cphc.200700130 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja039095610.1021/ja0390956 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.36702710.1063/1.367027 ↗
45. R. J.Murdey unpublished.