journal article·2016-01Open access

Role and Optimization of the Active Oxide Layer in TiO2‐Based RRAM

Anna Regoutz, Isha Gupta, Alexantrou Serb, Ali Khiat, Francesco Borgatti, Tien‐Lin Lee, Christoph Schlueter, Piero Torelli, Benoit Gobaut, Mark Light, Daniela Carta, Stuart Pearce, Giancarlo Panaccione, Themistoklis Prodromakis

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 26· Issue 4

Abstract

TiO2 is commonly used as the active switching layer in resistive random access memory. The electrical characteristics of these devices are directly related to the fundamental conditions inside the TiO2 layer and at the interfaces between it and the surrounding electrodes. However, it is complex to disentangle the effects of film “bulk” properties and interface phenomena. The present work uses hard X‐ray photoemission spectroscopy (HAXPES) at different excitation energies to distinguish between these regimes. Changes are found to affect the entire thin film, but the most dramatic effects are confined to an interface. These changes are connected to oxygen ions moving and redistributing within the film. Based on the HAXPES results, post‐deposition annealing of the TiO2 thin film was investigated as an optimisation pathway in order to reach an ideal compromise between device resistivity and lifetime. The structural and chemical changes upon annealing are investigated using X‐ray absorption spectroscopy and are further supported by a range of bulk and surface sensitive characterisation methods. In summary, it is shown that the management of oxygen content and interface quality is intrinsically important to device behavior and that careful annealing procedures are a powerful device optimisation technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nano Group, Southampton Nanofabrication Centre Department of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati (CNR‐ISMN) via P. Gobetti 101 I‐40129 Bologna Italy

Diamond Light Source Ltd Diamond House Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot OX11 0DE UK

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – Istituto Officina dei Materiali (CNR‐IOM) Lab TASC, S.S.14, Km 163.5 I‐34149 Trieste Italy

Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA Area Science Park I‐34149 Trieste Italy

Department of Chemistry University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK

Funding

Italian Ministry of Research · “Progetto Strategico di ricerca di interesse nazionale NFFA” · RAMP · SmartLab

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978352765486410.1002/9783527654864 ↗
2. 10.1109/TCT.1971.108333710.1109/TCT.1971.1083337 ↗
3. 10.1109/PROC.1976.1009210.1109/PROC.1976.10092 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20080132310.1002/smll.200801323 ↗
5. 10.1088/0143-0807/30/4/00110.1088/0143-0807/30/4/001 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2008.16010.1038/nnano.2008.160 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20090082210.1002/adma.200900822 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat307010.1038/nmat3070 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20110337910.1002/adma.201103379 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms173710.1038/ncomms1737 ↗
11. 10.3762/bjnano.4.5510.3762/bjnano.4.55 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-610.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-6 ↗
13. 10.1166/jnn.2012.665210.1166/jnn.2012.6652 ↗
14. Govoreanu B. · IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet · 2011 · 31 · 6
15. 10.1038/nmat307010.1038/nmat3070 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.352452110.1063/1.3524521 ↗
17. Ielmini D. · IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. · 2011 · 17 · 2
18. 10.1002/adfm.20100125410.1002/adfm.201001254 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/30/30520310.1088/0957-4484/21/30/305203 ↗
20. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/25400110.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.11.01310.1016/j.microrel.2013.11.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.02.02810.1016/j.mee.2009.02.028 ↗
23. 10.3938/jkps.58.40710.3938/jkps.58.407 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.15511710.1103/PhysRevB.71.155117 ↗
25. 10.1002/sia.74021030210.1002/sia.740210302 ↗
26. b)Both IMFP and cross sections contribute to the peak areas used to determine the oxygen intensity IO. However they do not alter the qualitative trends observed.
27. 10.2172/454504010.2172/4545040 ↗
28. 10.3938/jkps.64.41910.3938/jkps.64.419 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.476534210.1063/1.4765342 ↗
30. 10.1109/TED.2014.231020010.1109/TED.2014.2310200 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat274810.1038/nmat2748 ↗
32. 10.1155/2014/57816810.1155/2014/578168 ↗
33. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/25401010.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254010 ↗
34. 10.2138/am.2007.234410.2138/am.2007.2344 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01686-510.1016/S0168-583X(02)01686-5 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1236610.1103/PhysRevB.41.12366 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.24510210.1103/PhysRevB.69.245102 ↗
38. Karatchevtseva I. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 91 · 2015
39. 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.06.06110.1016/j.cplett.2011.06.061 ↗
40. 10.1039/an994190060910.1039/an9941900609 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.06040110.1103/PhysRevB.72.060401 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.274948910.1063/1.2749489 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.311936410.1063/1.3119364 ↗