journal article·2019-10

Fluorous Metal–Organic Frameworks and Nonporous Coordination Polymers as Low‐κ Dielectrics

Simona Galli, Alessandro Cimino, Joshua F. Ivy, Carlotta Giacobbe, Ravi K. Arvapally, Rebecca Vismara, Stefano Checchia, Mustafa A. Rawshdeh, Christian T. Cardenas, Waleed K. Yaseen, Angelo Maspero, Mohammad A. Omary

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 29· Issue 40
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A fluorous metal–organic framework [Cu(FBTB)(DMF)] (FMOF‐3) [H2FBTB = 1,4‐bis(1‐H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)tetrafluorobenzene] and fluorous nonporous coordination polymer [Ag2(FBTB)] (FN‐PCP‐1) are synthesized and characterized as for their structural, thermal, and textural properties. Together with the corresponding nonfluorinated analogues lc‐[Cu(BTB)(DMF)] and [Ag2(BTB)], and two known (super)hydrophobic MOFs, FMOF‐1 and ZIF‐8, they have been investigated as low‐dielectric constant (low‐κ) materials under dry and humid conditions. The results show that substitution of hydrogen with fluorine or fluoroalkyl groups on the organic linker imparts higher hydrophobicity and lower polarizability to the overall material. Pellets of FMOF‐1, FMOF‐3, and FN‐PCP‐1 exhibit κ values of 1.63(1), 2.44(3), and 2.57(3) at 2 × 106 Hz, respectively, under ambient conditions, versus 2.94(8) and 3.79(1) for lc‐[Cu(BTB)(DMF)] and [Ag2(BTB)], respectively. Such low‐κ values persist even upon exposure to almost saturated humidity levels. Correcting for the experimental pellet density, the intrinsic κ for FMOF‐1 reaches the remarkably low value of 1.28, the lowest value known to date for a hydrophobic material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Magnetism in coordination complexes · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia Università dell'Insubria Via Valleggio 11 22100 Como Italy

Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali Via Giusti 9 50121 Firenze Italy

Department of Chemistry University of North Texas Denton TX 76203 USA

European Synchrotron Radiation Facility 71 avenue des Martyrs, CS 40220 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9 France

Department of Chemistry Yarmouk University Irbid 21163 Jordan

Funding

Welch Foundation · National Science Foundation · European Synchrotron Radiation Facility

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. Baklanov M. R. · 2017
2. 10.1007/978-3-642-55908-210.1007/978-3-642-55908-2 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr900281910.1021/cr9002819 ↗
4. Wang W. C. · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 5457
5. 10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1769::AID-ADMA1769>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1769::AID-ADMA1769>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
6. 10.1109/IEDM.1997.65049610.1109/IEDM.1997.650496 ↗
7. http://www.itrs2.net/ access date June 11th2019.
8. By definition low‐κ; materials are materials with κ; < 4.
9. 10.1149/1.154546710.1149/1.1545467 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.177816910.1149/1.1778169 ↗
11. Sears F. W. · 1982
12. D. M.Smith G. P.Johnston W. C.Ackerman S.‐P.Jeng B. E.Gnade U.S. Pat. 6 437 007 B1 2002.
13. D. M.Smith G. P.Johnston W. C.Ackerman R. A.Stoltz A.Maskara T.Ramos S.‐P.Jeng B. E.Gnade U.S. Pat. 6 645 878 B2 2003.
14. 10.1149/1.179051010.1149/1.1790510 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.352946110.1063/1.3529461 ↗
16. 10.1039/c2jm34079h10.1039/c2jm34079h ↗
17. 10.1039/c3cc45066j10.1039/c3cc45066j ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.02610.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.026 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp502964610.1021/jp5029646 ↗
20. 10.1039/C4CE00218K10.1039/C4CE00218K ↗
21. 10.1021/cg401472k10.1021/cg401472k ↗
22. 10.1039/C5RA08074F10.1039/C5RA08074F ↗
23. 10.1039/c2jm14961c10.1039/c2jm14961c ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20090060010.1002/adfm.200900600 ↗
25. 10.1080/00958972.2011.55497810.1080/00958972.2011.554978 ↗
26. 10.1039/C3NJ01551C10.1039/C3NJ01551C ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms1183010.1038/ncomms11830 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0079910.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00799 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0200310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02003 ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20120144010.1002/anie.201201440 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja077526510.1021/ja0775265 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7SC00278E10.1039/C7SC00278E ↗
33. 10.1039/c3cc41564c10.1039/c3cc41564c ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20141146210.1002/anie.201411462 ↗
35. C.Yang M. A.Omary U.S. Pat. 8 715 395 2014.
36. C.Yang M. A.Omary U.S. Pat. 8 343 260 2013.10.1142/9789814449021_bmatter ↗
37. 10.1021/ja400754p10.1021/ja400754p ↗
38. 10.1021/ja208408n10.1021/ja208408n ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20080473910.1002/anie.200804739 ↗
40. 10.1039/C5CE00561B10.1039/C5CE00561B ↗
41. 10.1039/C4TA01798F10.1039/C4TA01798F ↗
42. 10.1021/ja305267m10.1021/ja305267m ↗
43. 10.1039/c1cc14594k10.1039/c1cc14594k ↗
44. 10.1039/c1sc00136a10.1039/c1sc00136a ↗
45. 10.1039/C7CS00122C10.1039/C7CS00122C ↗
46. 10.1002/celc.20140245610.1002/celc.201402456 ↗
47. 10.1002/chem.20110159510.1002/chem.201101595 ↗
48. 10.1038/am.2016.17510.1038/am.2016.175 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.00510.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.005 ↗
50. 10.1021/cm302610z10.1021/cm302610z ↗
51. 10.1039/C4TC00149D10.1039/C4TC00149D ↗
52. Low J. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 131 · 15835
53. 10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00609-110.1016/S1387-1811(02)00609-1 ↗
54. Greathouse J. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 10679
55. 10.1021/ja061716i10.1021/ja061716i ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ica.2008.11.03110.1016/j.ica.2008.11.031 ↗
57. 10.1246/cl.2008.95610.1246/cl.2008.956 ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20150514910.1002/anie.201505149 ↗
59. 10.1021/jo010635w10.1021/jo010635w ↗
60. Joule J. A. · 2010
61. 10.1023/A:101162572880310.1023/A:1011625728803 ↗
62. 10.1107/S090744490804362X10.1107/S090744490804362X ↗
63. 10.1021/ja403204910.1021/ja4032049 ↗
64. 10.1039/b927499e10.1039/b927499e ↗
65. 10.1002/cssc.20130116310.1002/cssc.201301163 ↗
66. 10.1039/c3cc43352h10.1039/c3cc43352h ↗
67. 10.1021/ja109317e10.1021/ja109317e ↗
68. Materials Studio v. 4.1 Biovia San Diego CA USA.
69. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-11413710.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114137 ↗
70. More in detail in the same temperature range thea‐axis is essentially unaffected by temperature increase whereas theb‐ andc‐axis vary by –0.3% and 1.2% with a consequent modification of the aperture of the 1‐D channels.
71. The radius of the circumference inscribed in the rhombic channel increases by ∼1%.
72. 10.1007/s10450-011-9342-610.1007/s10450-011-9342-6 ↗
73. A drop of water laid down a pellet of lc‐[Cu(BTB)(DMF)] occupies all the available surface precluding contact angle measurements and suggesting a hydrophilic behaviour.
74. 10.1002/anie.20130348410.1002/anie.201303484 ↗
75. The dielectric constant ofFMOF‐1is higher when pressed at 0.5 kbar than when pressed at 0.7 kbar which is counterintuitive as high pressure reasonably causes a reduction in the air (κ;∼1) volume contained in the pellet which should increase κ;. This is completely correct only when consideringdryair for a material with the same degree of crystallinity as a function of pressure. Despite the nominal superhydrophobic behaviour ofFMOF‐1 ref. [37] has shown byin situvibrational spectroscopy that minute amounts of non‐hydrogen‐bonded water (albeit undetectable by adsorption isotherms [38]nor GCMC simulations thereof [32]) are attached to theFMOF‐1surface. Moreover the phase purity of the material is compromised upon increasing the applied pressure to attain an increased admixture of amorphous material (Figure S19).
76. In the case ofFMOF‐1 to obtain the corrected κ; values the bulk density of the crystalline phase not that of the amorphous one was taken into consideration.
77. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
78. 10.1002/anie.20150769210.1002/anie.201507692 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80071-810.1016/S0022-1139(00)80071-8 ↗
80. 10.1016/0022-1139(94)03199-A10.1016/0022-1139(94)03199-A ↗
81. Young R. A. · 1981
82. TOPAS‐R version 3.0 Bruker Karlsruhe Germany 2005.
83. For the rigid body describing the ligand the following bond distances and angles have been adopted: C‐N N‐N of the penta‐atomic ring 1.36 Å; C‐C of the hexa‐atomic ring 1.39 Å; exocyclic C‐C refined in the range 1.40–1.50 Å (retrieved from a search for similar fragments within the 2019 update of the Cambridge Structural Database); C‐F refined in the range 1.32–1.38 Å (retrieved from a search for aromatic C‐F bonds within the 2019 update of the Cambridge Structural Database); penta‐atomic ring internal bond angles 108°; penta‐atomic ring external bond angles 126°; hexa‐atomic ring bond angles 120°. For the rigid body describing DMF the following bond distances and angles have been adopted: C‐N 1.40 Å; C‐H 0.95 Å; C‐O 1.25 Å; angles at the N and aldehydic C atoms 120°; angles at the methyl C atoms 109.5°.
84. 10.1107/S002188989101080410.1107/S0021889891010804 ↗
85. 10.1107/S002188989800600110.1107/S0021889898006001 ↗
86. 10.1107/S002188980604327510.1107/S0021889806043275 ↗
87. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
88. “ImageJ.” · 2019
89. Ida T. · Adv. Ceram. Res. Center Ann. Rep. · 2013
90. 10.1107/S002188988608945810.1107/S0021889886089458 ↗