Automated, Ultra‐Fast Laser‐Drilling of Nanometer Scale Pores and Nanopore Arrays in Aqueous Solutions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ability to quickly and reliably fabricate nanoscale pore arrays in ultra‐thin membranes such as silicon nitride (SixN) is extremely important for the growing field of nanopore biosensing. Laser‐based etching of thin SixN membranes immersed in aqueous solutions has recently been demonstrated as a method to produce stable functional pores. Herein, the principal mechanism governing material etching and pore formation using light is investigated. It is found that the process is extremely sensitive to the relative content of Si over N atoms in the amorphous membrane, produced by chemical vapor deposition. Commonly, SixN membranes are made to be Si‐rich to increase their mechanical stability, which substantially reduces the material's bandgap and increases the density of Si‐dangling bonds. Hence, even minimal batch‐to‐batch variation may lead to remarkably different etch rates. It is shown that higher Si content results in orders of magnitude faster etching rates. This rate is further accelerated in an alkaline environment allowing on‐demand controlled nanopore formation in about 10 s time even at low laser radiation intensities. These results highlight that photoactivation of the SixN by the incident beam is critical to the chemical etching process and can be used to readily produce nanopore arrays at any specific location.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering Technion–IIT Haifa 32000 Israel
Department of Chemistry Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2011.12910.1038/nnano.2011.129 ↗
2. 10.1038/nbt.149510.1038/nbt.1495 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl304267810.1021/nl3042678 ↗
4. Squires A. H. · 2017 · 353
5. 10.1529/biophysj.108.14047510.1529/biophysj.108.140475 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.02510.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.025 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep1164310.1038/srep11643 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl100058y10.1021/nl100058y ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0802810.1021/acsnano.6b08028 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn406102h10.1021/nn406102h ↗
11. 10.1021/nl102069z10.1021/nl102069z ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0705510.1021/acsnano.8b07055 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2007.2710.1038/nnano.2007.27 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7NR08406D10.1039/C7NR08406D ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20060119110.1002/adma.200601191 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat94110.1038/nmat941 ↗
17. 10.1021/nn505545h10.1021/nn505545h ↗
18. 10.1039/C4AN02388A10.1039/C4AN02388A ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaabce10.1088/1361-6528/aaabce ↗
20. 10.1039/C4NR00305E10.1039/C4NR00305E ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20130360210.1002/smll.201303602 ↗
22. 10.1371/journal.pone.009288010.1371/journal.pone.0092880 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-018-28524-510.1038/s41598-018-28524-5 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0151910.1021/acsnano.7b01519 ↗
25. Tahvildari R. · Small · 2017 · 13 · 110.1002/smll.201602601 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-018-28136-z10.1038/s41598-018-28136-z ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0680510.1021/acsnano.8b06805 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0648910.1021/acsnano.8b06489 ↗
29. Bäuerle D. · 2013
30. 10.1116/1.58023910.1116/1.580239 ↗
31. 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00153-010.1016/0022-3093(95)00153-0 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.469310.1103/PhysRevB.61.4693 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl504459c10.1021/nl504459c ↗
34. 10.1038/nnano.2013.22110.1038/nnano.2013.221 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0474810.1021/acsnano.6b04748 ↗
36. 10.1016/0304-3991(89)90322-710.1016/0304-3991(89)90322-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.04.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2009.04.005 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.35906210.1063/1.359062 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01567.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01567.x ↗
40. 10.1039/C7NR02629C10.1039/C7NR02629C ↗