journal article·2012-10-23

The Poisson Ratio in CoFe2O4 Spinel Thin Films

Michael Foerster, Milko Iliev, Nico Dix, Xavier Martí, Mykhailo Barchuk, Florencio Sánchez, Josep Fontcuberta

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 22· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The response of epitaxial CoFe2O4 thin films to biaxial compressive stress imposed by MgAl2O4 and SrTiO3 single crystalline substrates is studied using X‐ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. It is found that the Poisson ratio ν signals a non‐auxetic behavior and depends on the substrate used. The Raman modes show an increase in frequency when increasing compressive strain by reducing film thickness; this is due to the shrinking of the unit cell volume. Such behavior is in qualitative agreement with recent ab initio calculations, although the measured values are significantly smaller than predictions. In contrast, the measured Poisson ratio is found to be in good agreement with expectations based on general arguments of atomic packing density. Possible guidelines for searching auxetic response in materials with spinel structure are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Geological and Geochemical Analysis · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Glieck J. · The New York Times · 1987
2. 10.1063/1.271887910.1063/1.2718879 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat313410.1038/nmat3134 ↗
4. 10.1038/353124a010.1038/353124a0 ↗
5. 10.1038/3284210.1038/32842 ↗
6. Nakamura M. · Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. · 1995 · 20 · 3310.1557/S0883769400045085 ↗
7. 10.1080/0950083090334490710.1080/09500830903344907 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0277310.1038/nature02773 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.110321810.1126/science.1103218 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.198810.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1988 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature0933110.1038/nature09331 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.112210.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1122 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.22441510.1103/PhysRevB.76.224415 ↗
14. 10.1080/01411594.2010.54802310.1080/01411594.2010.548023 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00364-310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00364-3 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.05440510.1103/PhysRevB.76.054405 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.234946810.1063/1.2349468 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.326787310.1063/1.3267873 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20090176210.1002/adfm.200901762 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.05210.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.052 ↗
21. M.Ziese arXiv:1103.3666v12011.
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.10411710.1103/PhysRevB.82.104117 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20050097210.1002/adma.200500972 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.217264710.1063/1.2172647 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.278788010.1063/1.2787880 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.01442610.1103/PhysRevB.76.014426 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.18040210.1103/PhysRevB.78.180402 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.331829710.1063/1.3318297 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.17441510.1103/PhysRevB.81.174415 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.352792110.1063/1.3527921 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.280907510.1063/1.2809075 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0238772810.1007/BF02387728 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.02410410.1103/PhysRevB.82.024104 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.01410810.1103/PhysRevB.83.014108 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.14442210.1103/PhysRevB.84.144422 ↗
37. 10.1038/365735a010.1038/365735a0 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRev.99.178810.1103/PhysRev.99.1788 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14720310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.147203 ↗