journal article·2017-02Open access

Unraveling Surface Basicity and Bulk Morphology Relationship on Covalent Triazine Frameworks with Unique Catalytic and Gas Adsorption Properties

Giulia Tuci, Moritz Pilaski, Housseinou Ba, Andrea Rossin, Lapo Luconi, Stefano Caporali, Cuong Pham‐Huu, Regina Palkovits, Giuliano Giambastiani

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 27· Issue 7

Abstract

Activity and selectivity are key features at the basis of an efficient catalytic system for promoting the steam‐ and oxygen‐free dehydrogenation (DDH) of ethylbenzene to styrene. The catalyst stability under severe reaction conditions, the reduction of leaching of its active sites, and their resistance to deactivation phenomena on stream are other fundamental aspects to keep in mind while synthesizing new catalytic materials for the process. Although the recent use of single‐phase (doped or undoped) carbon nanomaterials has significantly contributed to improving this catalysis, the relationship between materials morphology and their chemical surface properties still remains to be addressed. Here, a class of highly microporous, N‐doped covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) with superior activity and stability in the DDH compared to the benchmark systems of the state‐of‐the‐art is reported. Notably, a comparative analysis of their chemico‐physical properties has unveiled the role of the “chemically accessible” surface basicity on the catalyst passivation on stream. Finally, the unique properties of the synthesized CTFs are demonstrated by their excellent H2 storage capability and CO2 absorption that rank among the highest reported so far for related systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds ICCOM‐CNR and Consorzio INSTM Via Madonna del Piano 10‐50019 Sesto F.no Florence Italy

Institut für Technische und Makromolekulare Chemie RWTH Aachen University Worringerweg 2 D‐52074 Aachen Germany

Institut de Chimie et Procédés pour l'Energie l'Environnement et la Santé (ICPEES) UMR 7515 CNRS University of Strasbourg (UdS) 25 rue Becquerel 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 02 France

Department of Chemistry University of Florence 50019 Sesto F.no Florence Italy

Kazan Federal University 420008 Kazan Russian Federation

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.117033510.1126/science.1170335 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.116804910.1126/science.1168049 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr300367d10.1021/cr300367d ↗
4. 10.1039/c3ee43463j10.1039/c3ee43463j ↗
5. 10.1039/978178262256710.1039/9781782622567 ↗
6. 10.1039/C5TA08620E10.1039/C5TA08620E ↗
7. 10.1021/cm500805c10.1021/cm500805c ↗
8. 10.1039/C6CY00796A10.1039/C6CY00796A ↗
9. 10.1021/cs400379h10.1021/cs400379h ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms381910.1038/ncomms3819 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5SC04158A10.1039/C5SC04158A ↗
12. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0010110.1021/acscatal.6b00101 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.10.03910.1016/j.apcatb.2005.10.039 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1566-7367(02)00105-X10.1016/S1566-7367(02)00105-X ↗
15. PRLog http://www.prlog.org/11727607‐styrene‐global‐markets‐to‐2020‐substitution‐of‐polystyrene‐by‐polypropylene(accessed: September2014).
16. Meyers R. A. · 2005 · 11.3
17. 10.1021/cm500566410.1021/cm5005664 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4TA02282C10.1039/C4TA02282C ↗
19. 10.1039/C5GC00971E10.1039/C5GC00971E ↗
20. 10.1039/C4CY01415D10.1039/C4CY01415D ↗
21. 10.1002/cctc.20150007410.1002/cctc.201500074 ↗
22. 10.1081/CR-10010438710.1081/CR-100104387 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20090367410.1002/anie.200903674 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja808292c10.1021/ja808292c ↗
25. 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00246-610.1016/S0920-5861(98)00246-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20090200910.1002/anie.200902009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.03.01010.1016/j.micromeso.2016.03.010 ↗
28. 10.1002/cssc.20140307810.1002/cssc.201403078 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20150500410.1002/adma.201505004 ↗
30. 10.1002/cssc.20150110610.1002/cssc.201501106 ↗
31. 10.1002/cssc.20090012310.1002/cssc.200900123 ↗
32. 10.1039/C4NJ01534G10.1039/C4NJ01534G ↗
33. 10.4236/gsc.2012.2100110.4236/gsc.2012.21001 ↗
34. 10.1002/cssc.20120009110.1002/cssc.201200091 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.03.02710.1016/j.catcom.2015.03.027 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20150086310.1002/adma.201500863 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.5b0944110.1021/acsami.5b09441 ↗
38. 10.1002/cctc.20150137110.1002/cctc.201501371 ↗
39. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
40. 10.1021/cs200131g10.1021/cs200131g ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20070571010.1002/anie.200705710 ↗
42. Wright P. A. · 2008
43. 10.1039/c1ee01222c10.1039/c1ee01222c ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0333010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03330 ↗
45. 10.1021/ma802322j10.1021/ma802322j ↗
46. 10.1039/C3TA15417C10.1039/C3TA15417C ↗
47. 10.1039/c2jm31248d10.1039/c2jm31248d ↗
48. 10.1021/ja803708s10.1021/ja803708s ↗
49. Wang K. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 50 · 4869
50. 10.1039/C5EE02574E10.1039/C5EE02574E ↗
51. 10.1039/c3cc41382a10.1039/c3cc41382a ↗
52. 10.1351/pac19855704060310.1351/pac198557040603 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.02310.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.023 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.00510.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.005 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.01210.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.012 ↗
56. 10.1021/cm06280810.1021/cm062808 ↗
57. 10.1126/science.116191610.1126/science.1161916 ↗
58. 10.1021/ja904673510.1021/ja9046735 ↗
59. 10.1002/anie.20070246610.1002/anie.200702466 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.04.02210.1016/j.apcata.2015.04.022 ↗
61. 10.1002/anie.20100286910.1002/anie.201002869 ↗
62. 10.1002/cctc.20140293410.1002/cctc.201402934 ↗
63. 10.1039/C4CC01693A10.1039/C4CC01693A ↗
64. 10.1002/chem.20140001810.1002/chem.201400018 ↗
65. 10.1002/aic.1485310.1002/aic.14853 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.01410.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.014 ↗
67. Zarubina V. · 1986
68. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.04410.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.044 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.02910.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.029 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.03.02310.1016/j.apcata.2011.03.023 ↗
71. 10.1126/science.113991510.1126/science.1139915 ↗
72. 10.1039/b600349d10.1039/b600349d ↗
73. 10.1021/ja901576510.1021/ja9015765 ↗
74. 10.1002/marc.20070005410.1002/marc.200700054 ↗
75. 10.1002/anie.20050424110.1002/anie.200504241 ↗
76. 10.1039/B614214A10.1039/B614214A ↗
77. 10.1039/b618053a10.1039/b618053a ↗
78. 10.1039/b604625h10.1039/b604625h ↗
79. 10.1021/cm070356a10.1021/cm070356a ↗
80. 10.1002/anie.20090463710.1002/anie.200904637 ↗
81. CTF‐pyHToutperforms the H2adsorption capacity recorded in 3D PAFs for low‐pressure H2measurements (up to 1 bar 77 K). (PAF‐3 2.10 wt% vsCTF‐pyHT 2.63 wt%.)
82. 10.1021/jacs.6b0764410.1021/jacs.6b07644 ↗
83. 10.1039/C5RA00569H10.1039/C5RA00569H ↗
84. 10.1039/c3ee42548g10.1039/c3ee42548g ↗
85. 10.1021/cm400019f10.1021/cm400019f ↗
86. 10.1039/c4cc01588f10.1039/c4cc01588f ↗
87. 10.1002/anie.20110189110.1002/anie.201101891 ↗