journal article·2008-09-23

The Role of the Interface in CO Oxidation on Au/CeO2 Multilayer Nanotowers

Zheng Zhou, Steven Kooi, Maria Flytzani‐Stephanopoulos, Howard Saltsburg

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 18· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The CO oxidation reaction is studied in this work using a controlled structure consisting of Au/CeO2 multilayers, in the form of towers of 10 × 10 µm2 base, with layer thicknesses in the nanometer range. This structure is prepared on a 3″ Si wafer using reverse photolithography and vapor deposition in an e‐beam chamber. The thickness of each layer is of nanometer dimensions and only the edges of the Au and CeO2 layers are exposed to the reaction gas mixture. The CO oxidation reaction rate is found to scale with the total length of the Au/CeO2 interfaces for nanotowers with the same total Au and CeO2 surface areas. TEM and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analyses reveal highly stressed gold films in the nanotowers, the lattice strain being temperature and film thickness dependent. Deactivation with time‐on‐stream is commensurate with relaxation of the gold films, as measured by a drop in their lattice strain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Bollinger M. A. · Appl. Catal, B · 1996 · 8 · 417
2. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.04410.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.044 ↗
3. 10.1246/cl.1987.40510.1246/cl.1987.405 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.02810.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.028 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101902061433610.1023/A:1019020614336 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.01.00110.1016/j.jcat.2004.01.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.02.04710.1016/j.apcata.2005.02.047 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja043652m10.1021/ja043652m ↗
9. 10.1126/science.110424610.1126/science.1104246 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.110242010.1126/science.1102420 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.06.00110.1016/j.jcat.2006.06.001 ↗
12. 10.1006/jcat.2000.306910.1006/jcat.2000.3069 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.04710.1016/j.susc.2004.06.047 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.03.03610.1016/j.jcat.2004.03.036 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.108572110.1126/science.1085721 ↗
16. 10.1023/A:101266612881210.1023/A:1012666128812 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.281.5383.164710.1126/science.281.5383.1647 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00208-810.1016/S0920-5861(96)00208-8 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp983206j10.1021/jp983206j ↗
20. 10.1038/334577a010.1038/334577a0 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.258.5086.133710.1126/science.258.5086.1337 ↗
22. M.Chaplin Ph. D. Thesis University of Rochester USA1997.
23. 10.1107/S002188988201203510.1107/S0021889882012035 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00594-410.1016/S0040-6090(97)00594-4 ↗
25. Smith D. L. · 1995
26. 10.1021/jp034380x10.1021/jp034380x ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.281910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2819 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01261-210.1016/S0921-5093(00)01261-2 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20070582810.1002/anie.200705828 ↗