journal article·2006-07-21

Exploiting Chemical Switching in a Diels–Alder Polymer for Nanoscale Probe Lithography and Data Storage

B. Gotsmann, U. Duerig, J. Frommer, C. J. Hawker

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 16· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Reversibly crosslinked polymer films have properties that are beneficial to scanned‐probe data storage and lithographic applications that use thermomechanical nanoindentation as a write or expose mechanism. The novel polymer under study contains linkages based on thermally reversible Diels–Alder crosslinking. Thermomechanical properties on the nanometer scale are analyzed by indentation experiments on polymer thin films using heated tips. The underlying indentation mechanism is studied at varying tip temperatures and indentation times, revealing Arrhenius kinetics. This is in contrast to the Williams–Landau–Ferry kinetics usually observed for polymer systems. The discrepancy is explained by the reversible crosslinking incorporated into the structure of the polymer that allows switching between two different states: a rigid, highly crosslinked, low‐temperature state, and a deformable, fragmented, high‐temperature state. An individual indentation volume of less than 10–20 L (10 000 molecule pairs) is estimated. These kinetics experiments demonstrate that a chemical reaction of only a few thousand molecules can be transduced into a mechanically measurable action. The ability to cycle between two sets of properties in these materials opens up new perspectives in lithography and data storage. Examples of data storage with densities up to 1 Tb in.–2 and maskless lithography with resolution below 20 nm are demonstrated at writing times of 10 μs per bit/pixel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JJAP.33.582910.1143/JJAP.33.5829 ↗
2. 10.1147/rd.396.068110.1147/rd.396.0681 ↗
3. 10.1116/1.59042510.1116/1.590425 ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199912)11:17<1473::AID-ADMA1473>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199912)11:17<1473::AID-ADMA1473>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
5. 10.1126/science.283.5402.66110.1126/science.283.5402.661 ↗
6. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.100542510.1109/TNANO.2002.1005425 ↗
7. R. Garcia inAlternative Lithography Kluwer Dordrecht The Netherlands2003.
8. 10.1063/1.164489910.1063/1.1644899 ↗
9. 10.1088/0957-4484/11/3/30910.1088/0957-4484/11/3/309 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.154194910.1063/1.1541949 ↗
11. B. Gotsmann U. Duerig inApplied Scanning Probe Methods IV(Eds: H. Fuchs B. Bushan) Springer Heidelberg Germany2006.
12. 10.1063/1.160083510.1063/1.1600835 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.255.5040.6410.1126/science.255.5040.64 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.106587910.1126/science.1065879 ↗
15. 10.1021/ma021067510.1021/ma0210675 ↗
16. 10.1021/ma020343c10.1021/ma020343c ↗
17. 10.1021/ma991899b10.1021/ma991899b ↗
18. 10.1021/ma990638z10.1021/ma990638z ↗
19. 10.1021/ma971014110.1021/ma9710141 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0014-3057(97)00009-810.1016/S0014-3057(97)00009-8 ↗
21. 10.1021/ma00212a00710.1021/ma00212a007 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.110977810.1126/science.1109778 ↗
23. X.‐Z. Zhou B. van Horn C. J. Hawker unpublished.
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83047010.1109/TMAG.2004.830470 ↗
25. For example we compared the DA material with the linear polymer poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) which has been well characterized for use in thermomechanical data‐storage applications [6]. To ensure that tip‐related artifacts can be separated from material properties the same tip was used for writing threshold measurements on both samples PMMA and DA. The DA polymer yieldedT0 heater = 490 ° andbheater = 0.5 ± 0.3° nN–1 and PMMA yieldedT0 = 405 °C andb = 0.65 ± 0.3° nN–1. Note thatT0 heaterandbheaterare converted toT0andbof Equation 2 by applying Equation 1. The hardness of the DA material (as given by the limit of writing at room temperature without additional heating of the tip) is significantly higher than PMMA which we readily attribute to the crosslinkage. The higher value ofT0could be due to a completely different indentation mechanism such as the dissociation proposed in this paper. The value is significantly higher than what would result ifTrcorresponded to aTgof 120 °C. On the other hand it is much lower than what would correspond to aTgof more than 200 °C—a value estimated from the molecular structure of DA under the assumption that the crosslink sites remain closed during indentation [24].
26. J. Bicerano Prediction of Polymer Properties 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker New York1996.
27. J. D. Ferry Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers 3rd ed. Wiley New York1980.
28. 10.1021/ma951385m10.1021/ma951385m ↗
29. 10.1063/1.172209810.1063/1.1722098 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.172655810.1063/1.1726558 ↗
31. The large uncertainty results from the cumulative uncertainties in thermal transport properties of tip and sample in the evaluation of the threshold and in the temperature calibration all discussed in the literature [11].
32. 10.1002/anie.19950217110.1002/anie.199502171 ↗
33. The volume V indented by the tip is between 10 and 20 nm in diameter. With the mass of a pair of DA molecules of 698 g mol–1and a density of ∼ 1 g mol–1 we arrive at 1000–10 000 molecule pairs in a single indentation.
34. 10.1021/la036112w10.1021/la036112w ↗
35. 10.1021/nl052056310.1021/nl0520563 ↗
36. W. P. King Ph.D. Thesis Stanford University Stanford CA2002.
37. 10.1115/1.144793910.1115/1.1447939 ↗