Influence of Molecular Dipoles on the Photoluminescence and Electroluminescence of Dipolar Spirobifluorenes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This Full Paper investigates a series of strongly fluorescent donor–acceptor‐substituted spirobifluorene compounds, red 2‐diphenylamino‐7‐(2,2‐dicyanovinyl)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (DCV), green 2‐diphenylamino‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene7‐carxoxaldehyde (CHO), and blue 2‐diphenylamino‐7‐(2,2‐diphenylvinyl)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (DPV), together with their spiro‐linked “dimeric” analogs, 2DCV, 2,2′‐bis(diphenylamino)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene‐7,7′‐dicarboxaldehyde (2CHO), and 2,2′‐bis(diphenylamino)‐7,7′‐bis(2,2‐diphenylvinyl)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (2DPV), respectively. The emission optical density and, hence, the intensity of photoluminescence (PL) or electroluminescence (EL) of the “dimeric” analogs is presumed to increase, which is beneficial for organic light‐emitting diode (OLED) applications. The physical properties, including the dipole moments obtained from quantum chemistry calculations, emission solvatochromism, fluorescence quantum yield (Φf) as well as the EL of these six spirobifluorene compounds have been examined in detail. We found that Φf as well as OLED performance (EL efficiency and intensity) of the strongly dipolar DCV decrease significantly in the “dimeric” analog 2DCV, but less so in the moderately dipolar CHO and 2CHO, and only slightly in the weakly dipolar DPV and 2DPV. This is parallel to the intramolecular dipole moment, which is large for 2DCV, medium for 2CHO, and very small for 2DPV. Here, we show for the first time systematically that the luminescence intensity is closely correlated with the local electric field induced by the molecular dipole. A strong electric field may facilitate radiationless decay channels with a charge‐transfer nature, leading to a high quenching rate. Consistent with this conclusion, which is derived from the red DCV/2DCV and green CHO/2CHO, our new blue fluorophore DPV with an essentially zero dipole moment has successfully achieved one of the best electrofluorescent blue OLEDs. At the same time, by doping the highly dipolar DCV into an isolated environment with the low‐polarity Alq3 as the host matrix, we obtained a very high performance of saturated yellow OLEDs as well, This is possibly due to the reduction of emission‐quenching dipoles from the neighboring molecules. Our results have provided an important insight in designing luminescent materials, as follows: molecular dipole moments should be kept at a low magnitude to avoid quenching induced by a strong local electric field in the chromophore.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cm049679m10.1021/cm049679m ↗
2. 10.1063/1.34340910.1063/1.343409 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00168-710.1016/S0009-2614(98)00168-7 ↗
4. 10.1002/masy.1998125010210.1002/masy.19981250102 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20040010210.1002/adfm.200400102 ↗
6. 10.1021/ol051359110.1021/ol0513591 ↗
7. Chiang C.‐L. · Proc. SPIE‐Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2005 · 5632 · 80
8. 10.1063/1.47461510.1063/1.474615 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00580-110.1016/S0009-2614(99)00580-1 ↗
10. Examples see: C. Reichardt Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry VCH Weinheim1988.
11. 10.1021/ic981125w10.1021/ic981125w ↗
12. 10.1021/ja040144410.1021/ja0401444 ↗
13. Crystal data forCHO: C38H25NO:Fw = 511.59 monoclinic P21/c Z = 4 F(000) = 1072. Cell dimensions:a= 10.3824(2) Å b= 28.2780(6) Å c= 8.9198(2) Å α = 90° β = 91.7920(10)° γ = 90° V = 2617.51(10) Å3 2θmax = 50.0o ρcalcd = 1.298 g cm–3. Of 20425 reflections 4628 were independent 362 parameters R(Fo) = 0.0301 (for reflections withI> 2σ(I)) Rw(Fo) = 0.0640 (for reflections withI> 2σ(I)). The GoF onF2was equal 0.854. Crystal data for2CHO: C51H34N2O2:Fw = 706.80 orthorhombic Pbcn Z = 4 F(000) = 1480. Cell dimensions:a= 14.9404(4) Å b= 11.3117(3) Å c= 21.3320(6) Å α = 90° β = 90° γ = 90° V = 3605.14(17) Å3 2θmax = 50.0o ρcalcd = 1.302 g cm–3. Of 28706 reflections 3017 were independent 250 parameters R(Fo) = 0.0395 (for reflections withI> 2σ(I)) Rw(Fo) = 0.0833 (for reflections withI> 2σ(I)). The GoF onF2was equal 0.925. CCDC‐645601 and CCDC‐645602 contain the supplementary crystallographic data of CHO and 2CHO respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccd.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre 12 Union Road Cambridge CB21EZ UK; fax: (+44)1223‐336‐033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
14. The layer thickness of each OLED is described in Scheme 2 in the Experimental section.
15. 10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:22<1690::AID-ADMA1690>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:22<1690::AID-ADMA1690>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
16. 10.1021/ja025515010.1021/ja0255150 ↗
17. 10.1021/cm02025010.1021/cm020250 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.147536110.1063/1.1475361 ↗
19. 10.1039/b307571k10.1039/b307571k ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20030438310.1002/adfm.200304383 ↗
21. 10.1021/cm034511710.1021/cm0345117 ↗
22. 10.1039/b402584a10.1039/b402584a ↗
23. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.06.00310.1016/j.synthmet.2005.06.003 ↗
24. 10.1039/b509325b10.1039/b509325b ↗
25. 10.1039/b501819f10.1039/b501819f ↗
26. 10.1039/b510035f10.1039/b510035f ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20050006710.1002/adfm.200500067 ↗
28. 10.1143/JJAP.44.848010.1143/JJAP.44.8480 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.216781410.1063/1.2167814 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.01.00110.1016/j.orgel.2006.01.001 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20050168210.1002/adma.200501682 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20060018710.1002/adfm.200600187 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20060054210.1002/adfm.200600542 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.139047910.1063/1.1390479 ↗
35. 10.1021/cm000467910.1021/cm0004679 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm020110010.1021/cm0201100 ↗
37. 10.1039/b206126k10.1039/b206126k ↗
38. 10.1021/cm020251210.1021/cm0202512 ↗
39. 10.1088/0256-307X/20/6/35210.1088/0256-307X/20/6/352 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.180391110.1063/1.1803911 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20040131110.1002/adma.200401311 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20030502210.1002/adfm.200305022 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20050038610.1002/adfm.200500386 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.22910.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.229 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.1997009030810.1002/adma.19970090308 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja039556n10.1021/ja039556n ↗
48. 10.1002/1096-987X(200012)21:16<1532::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1096-987X(200012)21:16<1532::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
49. G. M. Sheldrick SHELXL‐97 University of Göttingen Germany1997.
50. 10.1107/S002188989900602010.1107/S0021889899006020 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20030215110.1002/adma.200302151 ↗
52. G. Wyszecki W. S. Stiles Color Science: Concepts and Methods Quantitative Data and Formulae Wiley New York NY1982 p. 259.
53. 10.1016/j.orgel.2005.01.00210.1016/j.orgel.2005.01.002 ↗