Using Plasma Deposits to Promote Cell Population of the Porous Interior of Three‐Dimensional Poly(D,L‐Lactic Acid) Tissue‐Engineering Scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cell adhesion and proliferation on poly(D,L‐lactic acid) (PDLLA) tissue‐engineering scaffolds is low. This is generally regarded to be due to the surface chemistry of the PDLLA polymer, although topographic features often worsen the situation. This study reports for the first time successful deposition of a plasma polymer throughout the porous network of a three‐dimensional scaffold. This allylamine plasma deposit was used to improve cell adhesion on the PDLLA surface. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of sectioned scaffolds was used to demonstrate the penetration of nitrogen species to the inner surfaces and to compare the virgin PDLLA scaffold and the plasma polymer coated PDLLA scaffold with plasma‐grafted allylamine. The nitrogen concentration at the exterior and interior scaffold surfaces was greater for the plasma deposits than for the grafted surfaces, and the chemical state of the incorporated surface nitrogen using the two methods was found to be different. Evaluation in vitro was carried out by studying 3T3 fibroblast attachment, morphology, and metabolic activity on the scaffolds. Cell activity and attachment was found to be greater for the plasma deposits than the plasma‐grafted PDLLA scaffolds, and both were greater than for the virgin PDLLA scaffolds. It is concluded that plasma deposition is a viable method of increasing cell attachment throughout porous PDLLA scaffolds without changing the bulk characteristics of the polymer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00400-810.1016/S0142-9612(01)00400-8 ↗
3. 10.1002/1616-5195(20020201)2:2<67::AID-MABI67>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/1616-5195(20020201)2:2<67::AID-MABI67>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
4. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.012 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<417::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<417::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00284-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00284-9 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856299X0080110.1163/156856299X00801 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.1031810.1002/jbm.10318 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00153-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00153-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80244-910.1016/S1389-1723(01)80244-9 ↗
12. 10.1089/10763270032072010.1089/107632700320720 ↗
13. 10.1021/la950685u10.1021/la950685u ↗
14. 10.1021/ma951841710.1021/ma9518417 ↗
15. 10.1039/a705098d10.1039/a705098d ↗
16. 10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00196-510.1016/S0165-0270(00)00196-5 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1995.07056050910.1002/app.1995.070560509 ↗
18. 10.1002/sia.144410.1002/sia.1444 ↗
19. H. Yasuda Plasma Polymerization Academic New York1985.
20. Plasma Deposition Treatment and Etching of Polymers(Ed: R. d'Agostino) Academic Boston MA1990.
21. 10.1039/ft995910136310.1039/ft9959101363 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00479-X10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00479-X ↗
23. 10.1039/b201471h10.1039/b201471h ↗
24. 10.1163/15685620175325250710.1163/156856201753252507 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00080-510.1016/S0142-9612(98)00080-5 ↗
26. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<379::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<379::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
27. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00251-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00251-5 ↗
28. 10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e ↗
29. 10.1002/app.1993.07047090810.1002/app.1993.070470908 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00312-010.1016/S0142-9612(03)00312-0 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp048250f10.1021/jp048250f ↗
32. G. Beamson D. Briggs High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers: The Scienta ESCA300 Database Wiley Chicester UK1992.
33. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00784-810.1016/S0032-3861(98)00784-8 ↗
34. The same trend in nitrogen concentration was revealed by post‐deposition sectioning and analysis but roughness and consequent surface charging during analysis prevented multiple analyses along the diameter of samples produced in this way.
35. 10.1038/273345a010.1038/273345a0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.013 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00263-110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00263-1 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.a.1059210.1002/jbm.a.10592 ↗
39. 10.1039/b008188o10.1039/b008188o ↗
40. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.4710.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.47 ↗
41. 10.1080/71371359910.1080/713713599 ↗
42. 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00617-210.1016/S8756-3282(01)00617-2 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02561-510.1016/S0006-291X(02)02561-5 ↗
44. 10.1039/b315262f10.1039/b315262f ↗